WTF- the Confederates gave 20 EVs to a Latin state that's non-Anglo? They were okay with Cuba having that much power?
WTF- the Confederates gave 20 EVs to a Latin state that's non-Anglo? They were okay with Cuba having that much power?
On the selling war materials to Britain and France, it would be reasonable to assume that the Entente have naval superiority so whilst CSA ships would be at risk from U Boats, their potential trading partners won't be fully blockaded. In contrast US ships sailing to Germany would have to dodge an Entente blockade, that is unless Britian and France do not stop neutral ships in case they drag the USA into the war. Whilst such an action might also bring in the CSA, it would more advantageous to keep the USA out.
Interesting proposal and it would probably work for a few years as a sort of gentlemen's agreement. The sticking point would be fuels. The Central Powers' main source of oil is the Ottoman Empire and the USA. If the British can shut down any pipe line running from Iraq the supply from the USA becomes critical.It's an interesting dilemma for Churchill. Given that in TL-191 the British still lost the First Great War despite having a solid blockade clamped down on Germany, Churchill knows a blockade isn't a guaranteed war winner, so I would think he would err more on the side of not provoking the US into fighting. Still, he probably knows that Smith doesn't really want to fight, so that does give Churchill some room to broker a deal.
Maybe something like Britain won't interfere with the US trade to other neutrals (so no continuous voyage doctrine), and will allow the US to ship non-contraband items (e.g. metal ores, fertilizers, paper, fibers, and foodstuffs) to the Central Powers nations, in exchange for the US respecting the British blockade as to absolute contraband (i.e. arms, munitions, and military equipment) and to conditional contraband (i.e. fuels, railway equipment, clothing suitable for military use, and precious metals.) Smith might be willing to accept a deal on such terms.
Wait so will the U.S. get entangled in Great War II?
I agree with this, which means that St Petersburg is going to get superbombed as per the books.And i think americans would fight harder against any blockade and churchill and other bregundly acepting that, because without americans we still have a chance of victory.
It's an interesting dilemma for Churchill. Given that in TL-191 the British still lost the First Great War despite having a solid blockade clamped down on Germany, Churchill knows a blockade isn't a guaranteed war winner, so I would think he would err more on the side of not provoking the US into fighting. Still, he probably knows that Smith doesn't really want to fight, so that does give Churchill some room to broker a deal.
Maybe something like Britain won't interfere with the US trade to other neutrals (so no continuous voyage doctrine), and will allow the US to ship non-contraband items (e.g. metal ores, fertilizers, paper, fibers, and foodstuffs) to the Central Powers nations, in exchange for the US respecting the British blockade as to absolute contraband (i.e. arms, munitions, and military equipment) and to conditional contraband (i.e. fuels, railway equipment, clothing suitable for military use, and precious metals.) Smith might be willing to accept a deal on such terms.
Interesting proposal and it would probably work for a few years as a sort of gentlemen's agreement. The sticking point would be fuels. The Central Powers' main source of oil is the Ottoman Empire and the USA. If the British can shut down any pipe line running from Iraq the supply from the USA becomes critical.
There is also another pay off for a neutral USA. War loans to the Central Powers. Handled right the USA could buy some of the Central Powers new technology off the shelf although not the nuclear stuff.
Unless the Entete doing something stupid(like german otl ww1 like) would be pretty hard to do, i think the americans would have bigger gripes with the japanese for the pacific and china and without featherson make rumble south of the border, they would spend all their energies with japan
(that is a butterfly we ignored, the american-japanese war, that and if 1936 olympics game where will be)
So unless Japan joins entente, entete do something stupid in high seas or canada, american will keep neutral but heavilt friendly to CP.
And i think americans would fight harder against any blockade and churchill and other bregundly acepting that, because without americans they still have a chance of victory.
Interesting proposal and it would probably work for a few years as a sort of gentlemen's agreement. The sticking point would be fuels. The Central Powers' main source of oil is the Ottoman Empire and the USA. If the British can shut down any pipe line running from Iraq the supply from the USA becomes critical.
Techdread said:I suspect we'd see little change in terms of the Pacific War; the Richmond Putsch and resulting Freedomite Insurrection might see a change in the US focus away from the CSA, now seen as still weak and riven with instability, and back onto the Pacific against Japan post-war, but nothing to affect the endgame.