Now, I realize that it would take a near-ASB set of occurrences, but let's presume for a moment that Stalin prepares much better for the German invasion in 1941 (possibly with no purges, less persecution mania, and modernization of an army that would by 1940-1941 not only equal, but be superior to the German one), and by November 1941 the Soviet soldiers are plundering Berlin. Let's say Japan suddenly becomes cautious, and does not attack Pearl Harbor - and the US is paralyzed by an isolationist tendency.
This leaves USSR and Britain as the only remaining independent powers in Europe... let's say France falls into a civil war, and Italy switches sides. So, would USSR end up going after Britain, given that continental domination is already theirs? If so, would a Soviet Sealion be any more successful than the planned German one?
This leaves USSR and Britain as the only remaining independent powers in Europe... let's say France falls into a civil war, and Italy switches sides. So, would USSR end up going after Britain, given that continental domination is already theirs? If so, would a Soviet Sealion be any more successful than the planned German one?