WI: The Germans win the battle of Stalingrad?

Discussion in 'Alternate History Discussion: After 1900' started by SlyDessertFox, Jan 16, 2013.

  1. SlyDessertFox Literally Natalie Portman

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2012
    Location:
    New Jersey, USA
    So how would the war turn out if the Germans win the battle of Stalingrad (or better yet, they just bypass the city and go straight for the oilfields in the Caucasus)? How major of a blow to the Soviets would a complete German victory at Stalingrad be, and how would that play for the rest of the eastern front?

    Also, what would it mean for the north african front?
     
  2. Cymraeg Ebil bocagist CONSPIRATOR!

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2009
    Location:
    The Bocagecave
    That would require sane strategical thought from the Bohemian Corporal.
     
  3. RGB Corn Squared

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2009
    Location:
    Vancouver, Canada
    1. Oil fields of the Caucasus - there were no army groups in front of there, so they probably can take it, yes. It's a major impact short term. Can they hold it? Huge question. Also depends on how far into the mountains they want to go, if they actually want to cross the Caucasus to get Baku it won't be pretty.

    2. Complete victory - the Soviets abandoning the city, or actually capturing the defending army?

    Either way, once they cross the Volga they are very vulnerable to a counterattack from the North. The Soviets were massing considerable reserves, which were mostly used to add men to the city fight meatgrinder while the trans-Volga counteroffensives were readied. Here they could be used differently.

    3. North Africa? Why would it have any appreciable effect?
     
  4. lionhead Pretty fly for a white guy

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2007
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    Whatever the Germans would be doing they will have to rely on the weak Hungarian and Romanian division to cover their flanks, because the strong mobile Nazi troops where spearheading the advance into the Caucasus. The Soviets will eventually enmass their offensive and whether or not an entire German army has been destroyed at Stalingrad, they will break the Axis advance into the Caucasus. It migth take longer and will certainly cause even more casualties, but they will break them.
     
  5. RGB Corn Squared

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2009
    Location:
    Vancouver, Canada
    Depends on how much they commit and who is guarding the flanks, it could be that the entire force could be bagged if the Soviets are quick about it.
     
  6. M79 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2007
    When does the city fall?

    If it falls early (August-September), then German forces can probably take the Caucasus and its oil fields along with Astrakhan and mark the southern objectives of Barbarossa. Germany gets *a lot* more oil and the USSR loses an opportunity to avoid having to cross the Volga. It might delay the war a few months (probably 6-8 tops) but otherwise unless the Soviets will regroup and retake. It also gives Germany over 200 Soviet factories that had been evacuated which could be harvested for machine tools or destroyed outright.

    If it falls later (October-November) then minimal effect other than to delay the USSR by a month or two. Germany gets a little more oil and might destroy the refining capacity to keep it out of Soviet hands, otherwise much of the area will be destroyed just for denial.

    Barring some serious reogranization or a German miracle the war *might* reach winter 1945 but not much else.
     
  7. SlyDessertFox Literally Natalie Portman

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2012
    Location:
    New Jersey, USA
    This would be a good time.


    Also, what if we add to the equation that under whatever circumstance, Hitler dies around this time, or is overthrown in some coup, or just loses power in some way. Would this also help the Germans' position?
     
  8. Mosshadow Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2012
    Location:
    New Jersey
    Didn't CalBear's "Anglo-American-Nazi War" TL use this as the POD? Try reading that, its great
     
  9. jc1987 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2013
    The Russians if I am not mistaken, generally practice scorched Earth techniques. Would it have been possible for the Germans to have threatened the Caucasus enough to have scarred the Russians into burning their own oil fields?
     
  10. phx1138 Bocagiste troll

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2009
    Location:
    Charlie Townsend's guest house
    Does she? IIRC, the Sovs were busily destroying the facilities, & by the time the Germans got there, even with a much more rapid advance, there would have been no production coming out for the immediate term, nor even the readily forseeable future.
     
  11. snerfuplz Liveral Fascist

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2007
    Location:
    California
    Naw they wouldn't burn the oil fields just destroy the refineries and roads. The Germans would not be able to use the oil or at least not very much of it especially with a coming counter attack
     
  12. jmc247 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2010
    Lets say this happens and the Western Allies order Operation Sledgehammer to try to keep Russia in the war... the long term effects on the overall war certainly would be rather large.

    Many English troops from North Africa would have to be used and Torch would be canceled.
     
  13. SlyDessertFox Literally Natalie Portman

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2012
    Location:
    New Jersey, USA
    After a quick look at the wiki article, it seems like the invasion would be a disaster.
     
  14. lionhead Pretty fly for a white guy

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2007
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    Operation Sledghammer was planned for Fall 1942. If Stalingrad needs to be evaded or won then by that time its Winter 1942 so they would have already cancelled the plans. The Dieppe Raid made sure of that.
     
  15. MUC Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2005
    How much dependent were the Soviets from the Caucasus oilfields? Do they have an alternate sufficient source of oil / stockpiles?
     
  16. deathscompanion1 Eagle Baiter

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2012
    Location:
    UK
    They die in the snow.

    The Russians have a hard few years but eventually push the Germans back.
     
  17. RGB Corn Squared

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2009
    Location:
    Vancouver, Canada
    Baku was a major source if not THE major source. The rest of Caucasus was also important.

    Nobody has so far explained me how the Germans will reach Baku.
     
  18. Catspoke Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2005
    One can come up with a time line thats somewhat plausable where Stalingrad falls.

    Take one of the better Luftwaffe General Wever lives scenerios. JU88 produced as a level bomber earlier, No ME210, a limited run of DO19 prototypes as FW200 replacements etc..

    What you have is by late 41, early 42 a Luftwaffe that because of these PODs has an increase in reserves is able to keep up its strength through the attritional fighting, a more effective Luftwaffe in the Typhoon and Soviet counter attack stages of 41, with these butterflies the Germans avoid the Demanysk airlift so the Luftwaffe suffers further less losses.

    So June 1942 arrives and you have a German offensive supported by much a larger Luftwaffe, with incremental increases in ground forces from having more Luftwaffe support over the fall and winter 41. Stalingrad is taken on the rush in early August 1942.

    German drive in the Caucasus is reinforced and the Germans are able to take Grozny and cut the railway south from Asktrahan. Maybe the German could find a way over the mountains and get through to Tupase or Sochi or someplace further down on the Black Sea.

    Its an awful long way to Baku though (most Soviet oil came from Baku), lots of difficult terrain, supply difficulties are immense, better air supply can help in some places, but the Soviets are also not tied down at Stalingrad, can use the Caspian as a supply route, had some intrinsic supply capability in the Caucasus as well as access to Allied Lend Lease from Persia.

    Likely the intevitable Soviet counter attack comes just the same as OTL, the Germans don't have to have everything in Stalingrad and so don't suffer the complete OTL disaster, the Soviets can pick on the their Allies just the same, so the German have to pull back to the 1942 start lie eventually just the same as OTL (with less losses OTL).

    Any German victory POD needs a collapse of the Soviet state/ system. There were times that was close perhaps, October 41, July 42, maybe a little better German performance at these critical times makes the Soviet system dysfunctional enough due to low morale, famine on the home front, other shortages, people not obeying orders, Stalin shot by more created enemies, etc... Things breaking down enough that a negotiated 1918 style peace with Germany is possible.

    Without that its hard to see a German victory against the intevitable Soviet preponderance in resources+Lend Lease.
     
    Last edited: Jan 17, 2013
  19. Henriksson Happy-Go-Commie

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Location:
    UESR
    Not burn them, but definitely sabotage them so that not a single barrel of oil would come to German use before war's end.

     
    Last edited: Jan 17, 2013
  20. snerfuplz Liveral Fascist

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2007
    Location:
    California
    Fascinating read thanks for the post