The Red Baron's Mitteleuropa

Case Study: Germany and the United States




Manfred von Richthofen’s stint as a Siemens assistant manager in a factory where 2,000 Chinese workers labored on the manufacturing industry, producing radios for consumer use before he was promoted in March of 1924 to full time manager of a series of Siemens-led infrastructure projects in Beijing. At that time, Beijing was still the seat of the Beiyang government and its Kuomintang rivals expanded their economic, political and social collaboration with the White Russian regime. In addition, the three Cliques that were allied to each other (albeit reluctantly) had a major falling out due to disputes that arose from shady backroom deals not made in public. Von Richthofen’s position as manager of the Siemens Beijing Reconstruction Project was always in peril because of financial issues and because Germany was still obligated to pay reparations for its defeat in the Great War. Yet he could not abandon his position and condemn his Chinese employees to a life without any means of earning an income. So he held a meeting in April of 1924 in Tianjin between himself and several Chinese supervisors and told them about some changes that the Siemens office in the Chinese capital had to implement: wages would go down but a 40 hour workweek will be introduced with full lunch and snack breaks and subsidized (or free) transportation to the work site. Once the supervisors relayed the new changes to the employees, some of them bitterly quit their job but big brother Manfred got a big break when the top executives of Siemens notified him that the Abwehr was going to recall him back to Germany for political studies. As the Red Baron was just starting to experience the harsh life of a mere common, civilian manager in a prestigious company, his handlers in the Abwehr recalled him back to Germany, which he returned in May 17th. Upon his arrival, Manfred was escorted by Wolfram and Lothar to the Abwehr headquarters where they first met the delegation of the Deutschenationale Volkspartei’s militant arm, the Stahlhelm. In this milestone meeting, the von Richthofen brothers were asked on their political stance, a difficult question to answer since none of the brothers were politically informed. Finally, Canaris encouraged the von Richthofen brothers to join the DNVP as a way to enhance the Richthofen family’s fame and fortune, and to serve as a morale booster for a German public in need of a morale boost after the French and Belgian Armies occupied the Ruhr Valley when Germany could not pay its war reparations soon enough. When the Red Baron himself traveled to the Ruhr, he was furious to see French troops terrorizing the civilians who protested the occupation. Only after Lothar nearly got shot from an altercation with a French soldier did big brother Manfred called for another meeting with the DNVP and the Stahlhelm militant group. He came up with a series of proposals to attract the lower class into a party that is predominantly upper-class and middle-class. In addition, the “Richthofen Proposals” that Manfred would discuss with the DNVP also included a clause where he would oversee the recruitment of influential figures. In effect, the entire Richthofen family had officially joined the DNVP on November 11, 1924, the anniversary of Germany’s armistice with the Allies. Von Scheubner-Richter commented on Richthofen’s selection of such a date for his admission into the DNVP as inappropriate since it only signaled Germany’s growing pessimistic prospects but Rosenberg in Richthofen’s defense that November 11 was also a date worth remembering because in his words, “November 11, 1924 shall be the day Germany’s road to national resurgence begins”. On November 22nd, 1924, Manfred was scheduled to give a speech on his views about Germany’s present situation and how the German people should stop moping around and start doing something about it. This is the official speech:


“My fellow Germans who live not just in the present Weimar Republic, but my fellow Germans who are stranded in former Austrian lands that are now part of newly established independent Central European states, and in German Austria itself, I have come here to bring a message, not of false optimism, but of a sad reality. The sad reality is that with our economy going down the toilet, our Kaiser in exile as a result of agitation from a bunch of rabble rousers, and our army a shadow of its former self. The sad reality is that the victorious Allied powers did not want justice against us. They wanted revenge, especially our French adversary for whom they held us responsible for starting the Great War. They got their revenge for the humiliation we inflicted upon their decadent, collective egos and we’ve paid for it with our own defeat. By luck, I survived the Great War because of a simple, defective engine. I admit that I did not want to become the immortal warrior the Kaiser wanted me to become, but I do believe that my busted engine on the plane I used to fight the Allies have saved my life. Obscure individuals who could have made their mark in history remain obscure, but I have a second chance at making my own mark in the history of Germany. I am not here to bring any more pessimism, but to ask for your support. Recently, I learned of a new movement arising in the Kingdom of Italy where despite being on the winning side, the Italians were cheated of their gains by the Allies’ duplicity. Yet I cannot help but think of how we should proceed from here on in because all of us have different opinions on how Germany should recover. We will get our revenge, which I can promise you. However, the Kaiserreich has made several mistakes that led to its own defeat, namely underestimating the power of the Allies. We hoped to make the United States neutral, but thanks to our own desperation, we made the Americans our enemy. I do not want to make that same mistake. Therefore, I propose to reform a German national movement that should not only aim to recover our territories that were stolen by the Allies, but to include territories where our countrymen live. I respect and admire the Kaiser, but if our dream of a Greater Germany is to become a reality, then we must also aim at carrying on the legacies of the Holy Roman Empire. The Holy Roman Empire gave birth to two rival German states, one of which I proudly belong in the Kingdom of Prussia. Though Prussia remains supreme, I wish to reach out to our cousins in Austria and the borderlands of the new Czechoslovak state. Let us join hands in forming a German New Society.”


Richthofen’s proposal for a “German New Society” rang hollow in the minds of other members of the DNVP and due to some minor disagreements, he immediately thought about leaving the movement. However, his speech had resulted in several hundred new members joining the DNVP, almost all of them being of lower class. The traditional leadership of the DNVP criticized Richthofen for his populist stance and even Lothar expressed his skepticism on big brother Manfred’s plea for support from the public. Yet Manfred starkly reminded them, “Take care of your people and they will gladly follow you to the ends of the world”. Even though the German Junker class viewed the Richthofen family with admiration, Manfred’s experience while working as a Siemens assistant manager and full time manager in China opened his eyes and mind to a life experienced by the common folk. Even more so, his former subordinates had come from middle and lower classes and he shared a special bond with them. Well, most of them except for the pilot who was tragically killed on that same day the Red Baron were supposed to sortie. In Frankfurt, Manfred contemplated on giving up his membership in the DNVP until one of the new recruits came up to him and expressed his admiration. He then explained to the Red Baron of how he was frustrated to have been declared an invalid for a clubbed foot and how he had a failed operation that could not fix his leg. He pleaded to the Baron not to resign because he was the only living veteran that all of Germany can identify. It was in Frankfurt that the Richthofen brothers’ friendship with this individual would prove to be extremely helpful. The individual’s name was Joseph Goebbels.


Just before Manfred was set to continue his duties within the DNVP, the Abwehr contacted them just outside Frankfurt. According to Canaris, he had a secret operation in the United States where homegrown agents would easily give military secrets to Abwehr agents who would relay the information back to the Abwehr headquarters. Canaris pointed out that Manfred would not have to travel outside Europe, but he is required to give speeches throughout Germany. However, his first objective was to help set up a similar party in neighboring Austria. On December of 1924, Manfred and Wolfram journeyed to Salzburg to give a speech to the Austrian public, promoting the idea of an Anschluss between Germany and Austria. Many Austrians were thrilled to see a famous war veteran visiting their town, including another war veteran who was decorated by the last Habsburg emperor, one Georg von Trapp. It is also worth noting that Manfred and Georg first met in a Christmas party hosted by the latter while recovering from the loss of his wife, who died two years ago. They often talked about what they did during the war, and Manfred soon became fascinated by Georg’s experience in submarines that he offered to help establish the DNVP in Austria under the name Deutschenational Volkspartei Osterreich, but Georg hesitated. In his words that immortalized Austrian national identity, George famously said, “We Austrians did not fight the Turks for centuries just so we can allow a bunch of Prussian Junkers tell us what to do.” Georg’s response to Manfred had electrified the Austrian nationalists and immediately the von Richthofen brothers were summarily booted out of Austria. Before their departure though, Manfred met up with a pro-Anschluss faction that had just emerged after he gave his speech in Salzburg. The so-called Unification Party of Austria led by yet another unknown politician named Arthur Seyss-Inquart met up with Manfred at the border town of Branau and pledged their loyalty to him, but Manfred declined because he said that it was not the right time yet. The Unification Party of Austria established links with the DNVP and Seyss-Inquart also entertained an idea to Manfred that in addition to the reunification of the German lands, he could also restore the Kaiser on the throne and even spoke in favor of the Hohenzollern Restoration in the same manner as the Meiji Restoration in Japan a couple of decades earlier, but the Kaiser would have to share his power with the Reichstag in order to better manage this newly restored German state. In his memoirs, Manfred wrote about the idea of a Third Kaiserreich, since the First Kaiserreich was used to label the Holy Roman Empire, and the Second Kaiserreich was the nickname of the Wilhelmine German Empire. A “Third Kaiserreich” would not only be a continuation of the first two German Reichs, but hopefully different enough to try forming a potential coalition of states that might give support to the new Germany.


Georgvontrapp.gif

Georg von Trapp was not easily won over by Manfred von Richthofen's charisma when he proposed to form a similar movement to the DNVP in Austria. His impeccable record while serving in the former Austro-Hungarian Navy enhanced his pride as an Austrian and viewed Manfred with contempt because of his Prussian Junker background.


United States – From the Red Scare to Brown-Black Scare:


The United States of America emerged from the Great War in a prosperous manner, though it was marred by worker riots demanding better pay and better working conditions. The failed Bolshevik Revolution in Russia did little to cause a Red Scare when in 1919 there were several riots and fights breaking out throughout the mainland United States. The infamous Red Summer riots of 1919 involved whites seeking and attacking African Americans throughout the United States, and for the first time, African American groups formed armed “militias” to defend their communities against further white attacks. Even worse, anarchists of all kinds have launched mail bombs to several American businesses and US politicians. The deportation of Italian-American anarchist Luigi Galleani from the US to Italy along with many other Italian anarchists had not only bolstered the anarchist movement in Europe, but it also allowed underground socialists of all kinds to link up with the anarchists and to collaborate on their activities. Even though Marxist Communism may have been suffocated in its crib, the potential alliance and unification between the socialists and communists on one side, and anarchists and syndicalists on the other side would prove to be a potent and deadly force. It was the Black Scare of 1924 that escalated fascism’s appeal as an alternative to lawless anarchism. In September of 1920, the infamous Wall Street bombing had killed several people, and a failed assassination attempt against Alexander Mitchell Palmer was more than enough for him to ask the Department of Justice to grant him sweeping powers to deport suspected leftists. The trials of anarchists in the United States lasted from 1919 until 1924 when the US government began to shift its focus from fighting anarchists and socialists to combating the rise of far-right movements within its own soil.


AlexanderMitchell-Palmer-WC-38048-1-402.jpg

Alexander Mitchell Palmer nearly died when he was visiting Wall Street to discuss his bank account with the bankers when the Wall Street bombing occurred. His close calls with death resulted in far greater convictions and deporations of leftists from the United States to their country of origin.


---


So we're getting closer to the possible rise of Richthofen the charismatic leader of a reborn Germany. Unlike Hitler though, the Red Baron will have to be more subtle in his methods. Next update will be about Italy's post-war and hopefully I can find a suitable place for an anarcho-communist analogue to Al-Qaeda in terms of having anarcho-communist terrorists stage attacks.

Unfortunately, there are some OTL figures who served that Nazi Party that will be present ITTL, only they'll be with different parties. Imagine if Goebbels's talent in propaganda is mixed with the Red Baron's charisma, Germany is in for an extremely rough ride.
 
Last edited:
Very interesting post especially Manfred's introduction to politics and the Abwehr. As for OTL nazis it only makes sense that you would include them after all they were thick in post war German politics.
Curious to see who you'll use and who will be consigned to the dustbin of history. :D
I could easily see Ernst Roehm becoming Richthofen's rival and enemy.
Looking forward to more. :)
 
Very interesting post especially Manfred's introduction to politics and the Abwehr. As for OTL nazis it only makes sense that you would include them after all they were thick in post war German politics.
Curious to see who you'll use and who will be consigned to the dustbin of history. :D
I could easily see Ernst Roehm becoming Richthofen's rival and enemy.
Looking forward to more. :)

I did say that I have a big role for figures like Fegelein, Heydrich and Kaltenbrunner. ;)

Roehm would still be a rabble rouser, but expect Manfred to create some sort of power struggle within the DNVP that might result in the party splitting into the Old DNVP (Reinhold Wurre conservative faction) and the New DNVP (Manfred von Richthofen Volkisch-Populist faction).

Also, what do you think of anarchists running around in Italian overseas territories? That update will focus more on Italy, and hopefully after that I will try to focus on a Persia update.
 
I did say that I have a big role for figures like Fegelein, Heydrich and Kaltenbrunner. ;)

Roehm would still be a rabble rouser, but expect Manfred to create some sort of power struggle within the DNVP that might result in the party splitting into the Old DNVP (Reinhold Wurre conservative faction) and the New DNVP (Manfred von Richthofen Volkisch-Populist faction).

Also, what do you think of anarchists running around in Italian overseas territories? That update will focus more on Italy, and hopefully after that I will try to focus on a Persia update.
Your Italian idea sounds promising.
 
Also, what do you think of anarchists running around in Italian overseas territories? That update will focus more on Italy, and hopefully after that I will try to focus on a Persia update.

They will not last that much, Libya was reconquered and so Somalia, they will not find that much audience between the local and the military will shoot them at the first sign of trouble; the colonist have some other important thing to do like trying to stay alive, at least in Libya or build somewhat their life in the rest the 'colonial empire'.

PS: The British move in Albania is a prettry dick move from their side, the Trety of London cleary said that Albania was on italian sphere of influence (for both economic and strategic reason), making that offer mean pissed off any italian goverment for a lot of years for no reason as the UK don't need that position. On the other side can make Italy and Greece work together in the zone.
 
When Richthofen become the leader of Germany, they will be no Antisemitism laws, Which means that people like Einstein will stay in Germany;)
 
They will not last that much, Libya was reconquered and so Somalia, they will not find that much audience between the local and the military will shoot them at the first sign of trouble; the colonist have some other important thing to do like trying to stay alive, at least in Libya or build somewhat their life in the rest the 'colonial empire'.

PS: The British move in Albania is a prettry dick move from their side, the Trety of London cleary said that Albania was on italian sphere of influence (for both economic and strategic reason), making that offer mean pissed off any italian goverment for a lot of years for no reason as the UK don't need that position. On the other side can make Italy and Greece work together in the zone.

That is why it is called the Black Scare of 1924. Italian anarchists running around long enough for them to be suppressed, forced out of Italian Somaliland and into some other parts of Africa. Now that the communist and anarchist movements are kinda crippled, look for them to emerge as an analogue to OTL's Al-Qaeda mixed with the OTL Red Army Faction.

As I mentioned in an earlier update about this:

At the Versailles conference, the British delegation opposed the Italian and Greek plans for the partition of Albania because of its useful position as a buffer against the ambitions of those two states. When Italy offered to place Albania under its ‘protection’, meaning to make them into a protectorate, Britain rebuffed them and offered the Albanian delegation to rebuild its shattered economy in return for British basing rights on Albanian territory. Hearing this proposal, the Italian and Greek delegates walked out in protest.

Britain feared a stronger Yugoslavia in the long run and offered to help Albania in order to balance Serbia out. ITTL, one of the reasons why Italy and Bulgaria will form an alliance against Britain and possibly draw Russia in is precisely because they intend to challenge British supremacy in the Adriatic. Though Mussolini still harbors Italian imperial ambitions (Dalmatia) and Bulgaria desires Macedonia, they are united in their hatred of Yugoslavia. Curiously enough, Italy and Greece would stand to gain from the British error through an alliance (though Greece is also targeted by Italian territorial goals) but Bulgaria would have its hands full if they would have another conflict with Greece. One of the main goals of TTL is a Mitteleuropa managed by the Red Baron himself, with a huge bonus of an intact Royal Yugoslavia. Besides, it's not the first time Britain has screwed its allies over territory. They did it with the Arabs over their promise of an Arab homeland (thanks to the Balfour Declaration), they did it with the Kurds over the failed attempts at an independent Kurdistan, and they already did it with the Italians over Dalmatia (it went to Yugoslavia).

I also forgot that IOTL Greece tried to annex North Epirus but failed to do so. Perhaps the Italians ITTL might be more sympathetic to the Greeks in territorial compensations (they just lost Greek, or rather, restored Bulgarian Thrace to Bulgaria in the Bulgarian version of the Turkish War of Independence).

When Richthofen become the leader of Germany, they will be no Antisemitism laws, Which means that people like Einstein will stay in Germany;)

No anti-Semitic laws in Germany due to von Richthofen being a bit more tolerant towards Jews (in fact one of his subordinates from Jasta 11 was a Jew) and Erhard Milch ITTL will become the head of a reconstructed Luftwaffe. Of course, expect Germany to make overtures to Israel in terms of trying to lure the Revisionist Zionist faction away from the British. Without these laws, German scientists of Jewish descent would happily help von Richthofen get the nuclear bomb and expect German rocket science to become more sophisticated.
 
Last edited:
About the Mandate of Palestine and possibly Israel in the long run, would they be better off allied with Britain (as in OTL), or with Germany (Richthofen's Reich)? Because assuming that another conflict as come and go in this case, Israel and the Levant would definitely become a huge theater of competing interests. We have:

- Britain with their need to preserve their empire with the Mandate of Palestine and Iraq as two necessary key areas that glued the whole thing together.

- Germany with their hopes of expanding their influence to hopefully Turkey and the Levant. Of course, there's the oil supplies of the Middle East to consider as well, given that Mitteleuropa will become more dependent on energy supplies like oil and maybe later on natural gas.

- The Arab states that might be supported by Russia or Mitteleuropa if they want to unite like IOTL.

- Persia/Iran might become a regional player in the Middle East, especially when it comes to the Shia Muslim community of Iraq and Syria.

- Finally, Russia because they still want a warm water port even if they may not have the stomach to get it.
 
Case Study: Italy and Russia




Despite being on the same side as the Entente in the Great War, Italy felt cheated as a result of Wilson’s Fourteen Points that called for national self-determination with regards to the minority groups that lived in the extinct Austro-Hungarian Empire. This was evident by how Fiume and Dalmatia escaped from Italy’s clutches and somehow Fiume was reorganized into the Free State of Fiume while Dalmatia was annexed by the Kingdom of the Serbs, Croats and Slovenes. On September 12, 1919, a young Italian nationalist named Gabriele D’Annunzio took over the city of Fiume and after a lengthy occupation period with failed negotiations with the Italian government, he declared the Regency of Carnaro. As Carnaro remained unrecognized by the entire world, but in December of 1920 on Bloody Christmas D’Annunzio and his loyalists were ejected out of Fiume. Unfortunately for the legally recognized government of the Free State of Fiume, D’Annunzio’s faction recaptured the city and a civil war soon broke out when the Italian Army launched an offensive into the D’Annunzio-controlled portion of Fiume. In what became known as the Fiume Conflict, the D’Annunzio loyalists barely had any weapons to use against their enemies and the fighting mainly took place in Fiume for an entire year until the Fascists in Italy were able to march towards Rome and successfully forced the King of Italy to grant an unknown figure named Benito Mussolini his wish to become the Prime Minister.


The origins of Fascism can be traced to Mussolini’s frustrations at the pacifistic nature of the Socialist Party and with his own creation of the Fascist Party; Mussolini was able to shift the ideological stance of his party from the left towards the right. Inspired by D’Annunzio’s actions in nearby Fiume, Mussolini copied his style of government, rejecting democracy in favor of a one man rule. It was not by accident that Italian fascism became the blueprint for other fascist movements that soon emerged after the Black Scare of 1924; including the Mladosloveni movement that is emerging in Russia two years after the Black Scare occurred. He was able to become Prime Minister when Victor Emmanuel III was caught in a political deadlock between suppressing the Fascists and triggering civil war in the process, or to allow the anti-monarch Socialists to form a government. Within those two years between Mussolini’s rise to power and the Black Scare of 1924, the Duce used that time to consolidate control of his power as Socialists and liberals were soon arrested and imprisoned. Mussolini’s cult of personality soon became the vocal feature of the Fascist way of life in Italy, but Mussolini was not aware that his Fascist ideals were being copied and refined by another far-right group, this time coming from Moscow. When Italy and Russia established diplomatic relations on March of 1923, Mussolini sent an Italian Army leader named Mario Roatta to Moscow to oversee the first meeting with the two countries. In Moscow, Roatta and his subordinate Ettore Bastico met Lavr Kornilov and the emerging Mladoslovenists who were eager to help Italy improve its economy and military. The White Russian leadership was impressed by the way Mussolini brought law and order to his country but expressed regret that Russia has already done it. When Roatta brought up the issue of the Vatican’s relationship with the Russian Orthodox Church, it was Denikin who flatly said, “There shall be no talk of rapprochement with the Catholics unless they recognized our church on an equal basis with theirs”. The Russian animosity towards Catholicism was still strong, a fact that Mussolini had to constantly bring the issue up when he met the Catholic clergy in the Vatican on June of 1923. Needless to say, Mussolini was presented with a very powerful ally that he could work with if his aim of Greater Italy was to be realized. To make sure that Italy has more friends, Mussolini sent Alessandro Pavolini to Bulgaria for a meeting with Tsar Ferdinand. In Sofia, Pavolini and Vladimir Vazov toasted to the first Italian establishment of diplomatic relations with Bulgaria and pledged to make plans for the future of the Balkans. While Italy’s sphere of influence can be demarcated in Yugoslavia, the problem of Macedonia was an issue that the Bulgarians brought up. Vazov had always talked passionately about creating the Greater Bulgaria that was made in the Treaty of San Stefano but the Congress of Berlin had denied them that chance. The problem with Italy’s expansion plans and its reaction to Bulgarian territorial ambitions is that Macedonia and Thrace are two important areas that are coveted for their natural resources and their strategic value. The Bulgarians also know that they have the closest chance of getting Constantinople from the Turks and with the addition of Constantinople; they made plans to conquer northwestern Anatolia just to acquire the strategic control of the Bosporus Straits. For now, the festivities were important to the Italians.


The Black Scare of 1924-25:


The origins of the Black Scare from 1924 to 1925 can easily be traced to the Palmer Raids that took place in the United States, especially where Italian anarchists were concerned. The deportation of Luigi Galleani and many other Italian anarchists from the United States had inadvertently given the anarchist movement in Europe a second breathing chance. No sooner did Galleani stepped on Italian soil did he made plans to set up an anarchist controlled free territory in any Italian territory where they might succeed. Unfortunately, he did not know which Italian territory he would first settle down in, because he was away for a long time, having spent a considerable amount of time in the United States. Galleani decided to travel to Italian Somaliland where he can settle down and formulate his detailed plans to set up an anarchist administration in Italian Somaliland. However, he was short of funds needed to create a militant arm of the anarchist movement. Fortunately, Galleani was notified by a fellow anarchist that he could join the Unione Sindicale Italiana, an anarcho-syndicalist trade union, provided that he actually has a blue collar job. Through other contacts, Galleani landed a job as a railroad worker, repairing tracks that were broken down. Between March and July of 1924, Galleani struggled to meet up with the USI leadership and repeated attempts to establish contacts were unsuccessful. It was not until a young anarchist named Gino Lucetti arrived in Italian Somaliland in August 3rd that Galleani finally managed to have a first meeting with Lucetti. The two men discussed their common goal of getting rid of Mussolini and for Italy to plunge deeper into instability long enough for the anarchists to establish a small Free Territory in any part of the Italian Empire. However, their immediate goal soon emerged as Benito Mussolini became the anarchists’ target. So for only two months they purchased weapons and ammunition as Galleani was fired from his job for constantly showing up to work late. Soon, Galleani and Lucetti traveled to Italy to carry out their assassination attempt on Mussolini. Upon their arrival in Naples, they soon encountered Italian gendarmerie and started a gun battle with them. Fortunately for the duo, they fled from the city when a group of anarchists arrived to see what is going on. Only when Lucetti told his comrades about Galleani and his experience in the United States did Galleani was fully inducted into the Italian anarchist movement. The anarchists began their reign of terror as mail bombs were constructed under Galleani’s guidance as they were mailed to various targets. One of the bombs made its way to the regional Fascist Party headquarters in Parma. Another bomb was detonated in the German Embassy in Rome on October 12th but the most prominent official to fall victim to Galleani’s mail bombs was Galleazzo Ciano. Ciano was in Rome when he received a mysterious package, only to have it blown up once he placed it on his desk inside his office. Mussolini was able to play on the fears of a possible anarchist uprising by issuing orders for the Italian Army to crack down on anarchist cells throughout Italy. Finally, Galleani and Lucetti were captured alive on January of 1925 while they were due to meet up with another anarchist cell on the Italian border with Switzerland. After a short trial, the two men were executed at dusk as Mussolini used this opportunity to bolster the Italian Army’s fighting capability in their hunt for the remaining anarchist cells. Unfortunately, other anarchist movements in other parts of Europe reacted prematurely to the Italian episode by launching attacks on military bases in their countries. On February 14th, 1925 in what became known as Black Valentine, a radical Spanish anarchist splinter group launched an attack on the Spanish government institutions in Madrid. The Barcelona Metro was bombed in the same day, and there was also an assassination attempt against King Alfonso XIII while he went on vacation in Toledo. The rise of such anarchist attacks was later coined as the Black Scare, and it was because of the Black Scare that a new kind of movement was formed to counter amarchism but it would be different from fascism due to its militant nature: Praetorianism.


ciano.jpg

Galeazzo Ciano was the unfortunate victim of an anarchist bomb attack. His death prompted Mussolini to crack down on the anarchists and an even bigger reaction to anarchist attacks will result in fascism's growing appeal.


Praetorianism is a variant of fascism that involves a heavy mix of revolutionary socialism, ethnic nationalism and anti-liberalism. The movement is unique because the people who are part of the Praetorianist are in the military, though civilians might also join this movement. The most prominent Praetorianist movement is the Mladosloveni Party of Russia, or the Young Slav Party. The Mladoslovenist movement is a perfect textbook case of mixing revolutionary socialism (through the dissemination and refinement of old socialist ideals) and ultra nationalism (Pan-Slavism), while the Karaul movement has Praetorianist leanings. The Mladoslovenist movement was stuck between choosing Pepelyanev, Skoblin, Tukhachevsky and Melnyk as their nominal leaders, though Tukhachevsky toyed with the idea of appointing Melnyk as the new Prime Minister of Russia to demonstrate their willingness to put aside their religious differences and support each other’s ambitions. Melnyk’s tenure as the new Veliky Vozhd (Great Leader) from 1925 did not last long as his compatriot Symon Petliura soon took over but a power struggle emerged between Petliura, Tukhachevsky and the latest recruit named Michal Vituska. Vituska and Petliura opposed Tukhachevsky’s appointment as Veliky Vozhd due to fears of old Great Russian chauvinism while Tukhachevsky himself feels uncomfortable when Melnyk was the Veliky Vozhd. With Petliura as the leader of the Mladoslovenist movement, the Russians would not mind. The Russian members of the Mladoslovenist movement still harbored distrust towards Ukrainian Greek Catholic members of the movement because they feared the movement would turn away from the Orthodox Church towards the Papacy. To everyone’s surprise, the Mladoslovenist leadership compromised on who will emerge as the leader. Vituska was chosen instead of Petliura and Tukhachevsky not just because he was a Belarusian member, but because they assumed that if a Belarusian is in charge of Russia, the Ukrainians and Russians won’t have to accuse each other of seeking domination. There was only one problem: Vituska was too young to lead. Reluctantly, Tukhachevsky was forced to concede the leadership to Petliura and Petliura in turn, appointed Tukhachevsky as commander in chief of the Russian Army. Kornilov’s plan for his own downfall was not needed. On January 7th, 1926, Petliura officially proclaimed the formation of the United Slavonic Federation as the successor state to the Russian Empire. Contemporaries would later nickname it the Slavonic Federation, but the United Slavonic Federation would spend the first five years encouraging the non-Slavic minorities, especially the Tatars, Bashkirs and Kazakhs to emigrate to rump Turkestan. Surprisingly, Petliura called for negotiations between the new Mladoslovenist government and the Basmachi movement as the two Emirs were in need to resolve the conflict before Enver Pasha does something to screw up their peace plans.


Symon_petlura.jpg

Symon Petliura became the first leader of the Mladoslovenist regime in the newly formed United Slavonic Federation. Petliura's ascent into power was unusual in that he was one of the few Ukrainians who will hold the position of Veliky Vozhd.
 
Great post Marshal. :)
The idea of a fascist Italy-Fascist Russia alliance is a good one.
Like the bit about "The Black Scare" that was done very nicely.
Question where did come up with Praetorianism? I never heard of this one before although it sounds a little like a cross between Fascism and Nazism.
Did you make that one up or was it an actual movement?
 
Great post Marshal. :)
The idea of a fascist Italy-Fascist Russia alliance is a good one.
Like the bit about "The Black Scare" that was done very nicely.
Question where did come up with Praetorianism? I never heard of this one before although it sounds a little like a cross between Fascism and Nazism.
Did you make that one up or was it an actual movement?

I made this up, but it is based on the OTL Ba'athist movement. OTL Ba'athism is unique because it involves a lot of politicized military officers being at the front of the movement. Praetorianism can be named after the Praetorian Guard of Ancient Rome, since the Praetorian soldiers have a habit of overthrowing their leaders whose policies they did not like.
 
I made this up, but it is based on the OTL Ba'athist movement. OTL Ba'athism is unique because it involves a lot of politicized military officers being at the front of the movement. Praetorianism can be named after the Praetorian Guard of Ancient Rome, since the Praetorian soldiers have a habit of overthrowing their leaders whose policies they did not like.
Good concept and good name.
 
I'm also hoping to find out how Italian Army equipment can be improved though since they are always painted as lackluster. Especially Italian Army tanks, and I'm not sure how the Russian and Bulgarian Army tanks can be impressive too.
 
I'm also hoping to find out how Italian Army equipment can be improved though since they are always painted as lackluster. Especially Italian Army tanks, and I'm not sure how the Russian and Bulgarian Army tanks can be impressive too.
I can discuss this with some of my tank nut buddies. What's the POD here 1919?
 
I'm also hoping to find out how Italian Army equipment can be improved though since they are always painted as lackluster. Especially Italian Army tanks, and I'm not sure how the Russian and Bulgarian Army tanks can be impressive too.

Well the state of italian equipment in WWII depend on two factors:

- economic: Italy was never a very rich country and with limited industrial capacity and frankly the corporatism of Mussolini regime don't helped, quality control was poor and much of the armed forces contracts were for give money to the various national industries than to buy proper equipment (even more than the other nations). In the tank deparment in particular, FIAT hold the pratical monopoly regarding developing and production and was never capable of develop or acquire the proper tech and capacity expecially in built the motors.

- moment: well Italy prior to enter WWII just fought the Abyssinia war and the Spanish civil war, only the last one cost to the Kingdom of Italy roughly 8,3 billions of lire between the material used and the cost of the expeditionary cost aka the 15 and 20% of the overall national budget for 4 years for no tangible gain (so there were not much left for buy more modern material or upgrade the various bases as planned); and ironically teached the wrong lesson to the armed forces making them think that the tankette and the biplans were still usefull.
 
Top