Hrmph, well, I found this fractal terrains demo which has a climate mapper but I feel its inaccurate. Anyway, what do you think about this map below?
Azardin, post a map of that with normal coloring and I think I can globe that for you.
Hnau said:Hrmph, well, I found this fractal terrains demo which has a climate mapper but I feel its inaccurate. Anyway, what do you think about this map below?
Hnau said:And this for the topography/rivers. Some of the rivers need to be corrected, but... you get the gist
Do you mean without the red and green, or with something more akin to the UCS?
Hrmph, well, I found this fractal terrains demo which has a climate mapper but I feel its inaccurate. Anyway, what do you think about this map below?
Like, with vegetation and stuff.
Okay, to respond to this for the fourth time (I've had issues with the internet.).
For your version of the terraformed moon VT, I'd expect a slightly boring layout for the air currents and watered areas. Since the moon is either land or water (looks in the vicinity of 50/50 land/water) and in pretty much a even distribution. But there might be a few interesting variations in wind along the equator, and it certainly would be fairly liveable along the central body of water, and along the lakes.
The main desert I see would be in the western half of the map, particularly in the larger area of the land mass. Since it is all highland (or increasingly so at least) the central reaches of all of the land masses will be fairly dry (central east areas*)
I'm not sure of the effects of gravity on the system, as I've not read into it. I believe though, that the weaker the gravity the weaker the winds??? Someone correct me if I'm wrong, I don't want to give out false information.
And with the tidal lock...shit, that desert is probably on the dark side, right? That sucks. Worse than Antarctica then, but at least the sky will be pretty. Hmmm....bright stars and freeze your ass off temps....or twinkling stars and balmy breezes....
You'll find me on Earth still
==============================
*Lord Insane owes me for unintentional advertising
Azardin - what do you think of this planet I made? I probably put the desert in the middle of the Jungle, but how good is this?
Azardin, could you have a look at this thread about a Pangea with an Inland Sea?
I think its gonna depend on which of the maps you pick (or if you go with another one). They are both rather different (one being the future the other being the past), but I do notice that they've some basic climatological information in the colors used for the land. Dark greens look like well, greenery, and the deserts are clear enough.
You could theoretically add additional arid/wet zones depending on what the overall warmth of the planet is at that time, but in general I don't think I can really give you much more than that without a given picture to work off of.
Let's say we have a large super-continent(Pangea) that has an inland sea the size of South America. The sea to land ration is still 70:30 tho. The land is divided into 6 river valleys. Tho the valleys are divided from each other by Alps size mountains, and they all merge into the hill ranges and lowlands surrounding the inland sea. The equator runs thru the center of the land and inland sea i.e half is "north" of the Equator and half is "south" of the Equator. Let's say each river valley develops a civilization, technologically, equivalent to Egypt,Mesoptamia,India,China,Olmec,Chavin/Moche.
Anyway, I'd think that 2 of the great river valleys would be half jungle or more. Some of the great river valleys would have deserts though I suspect only as dry as the Kalahari. I'd suspect most if not all the rivers' delta plains would be mostly swamp/salt flat, but these could be drained. There would be Indian Ocean-like weather over the inland sea.
Civilization would begin at the same time as our world's did for comparison. The civilizations would expand upriver though slower than our Ancient Egypt. The civs would need to protect themselves against each other, so military tech and sea travel tech would both advance faster than our world. Technology as a whole will advance faster than OTL since innovations from one civ will reach the others much faster than our world. Being conservative, let's say long bows and chain mail by our 1000 BCE. Plus the faster military tech advances will lead to non-military tech advances as in our world.
Once we reach the point where each great river valley is mostly (70-90 percent) unified, we'd see alliances between empires to conquer others by sea and land. No one empire would be able to conquer and hold on to more than 2 other great river valleys. These expansions would be shortlived I believe. Should there be a world war (yes it is possible) then it's possible to have Pangea temporarily divided between 2 empires(about 1.5 Mongol Empires). These super-empires would be very short-lived however.
In time, the delta cities and the others of the inland sea plain would develop into Venice/Amsterdam-like cities. They would grow closer to each other than their respective empires. Their merchant classes would grow in power. Eventually, they would form a Hanseatic League-like alliance and free themselves from their respective empires.
Looks great. By the way, Azardin, you spelled 'Engineering' in your signature as 'Engeering'.