Even if horses are introduced, is there anything that says the Mississipians won't just use them as food and nothing else? I have to imagine it's partly just good luck that Europeans chose to domesticate horses instead of hunting them to extinction. That or I am missing some major mechanism that would work across all unconnected humans here.
As far as the temperature and humidty go, they'd do just fine. They do well today. .
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fjord_horse
It's the diseases (mosquito carried encephalitis, and others) more associated with warmer climates that would be a bigger problem.
Errant Roman cargo vessel lands in the New World spreading plague, seeds, and possibly cultural influence as a starting point? I like Cahokia as a starting point but like China itself having several warring states that are eventually unified under one government would be one possible solution. Remember that the Inka had done just that while the Aztecs were working on it.
The link doesn't mention anything on the breed in subtropical climates. I would like to know more about how Fjords and Icelandic horses adapt to warm climates but I've never found much about it.
Fjords have more hair, bigger bodies and smaller nostrils than warm climate horses. The wrong climate can effect how much rest and water they need for given amount of work. It may even depress their fertility. Today you could house them in stables, obviously not suitable for nomads.
Unless you're like a medieval scholar and refer to the Byzantines as the Romans, you're too late. Cahokia rose about 1050 CE. Also, to reach Cahokia you would need to sail up the Mississippi. The Iroqouis would be easier to reach, but they rose either between 1450 and 1550, or 1152, too late. Also, where would a ship be sailing for it to make landfall in the New World?
It would definitely be an interesting TL to see a Mississippian city-state, Cahokia or otherwise, establish a hegemonic empire similar to the Aztecs, and to see what the effects would be if that empire survived until and encountered the Spanish. I don't know why none of them apparently were able to reach those levels, but it seems like there could be a lot of PoDs possible apart from anything involving horses. Vinland introducing horses to North America is also a good PoD in itself, of course.
Could those Vinland-originating horses have the potential to introduce some sort of disease to the natives that could cause epidemics on the level of those caused by contact with the Europeans? Possibly so that native Americans would have stronger immunity by the time Europeans show up?
You would need to get the crops, agriculture and animals from China and/or Europe to eastern North America. It would need to happen more than 1000 years ago and the maritime technology was not there. More intense Viking crossings would help, but they would not bring southern European crops. On the Pacific side, the Polynesians did make it to Hawaii. How plausible could have been a Pacific Rim spread?
Does anyone know how many people lived in the area in 1491? I seem to recall an argument between high and low counters about how many people lived in the current USA pre-contact/disease.
Don't we have some evidence from chicken bones and some crop (sweet potatoes maybe) that we have limited Polynesia contact with Peru?
The reason Eurasians looked at horses and thought, "We should use these as work animals and not as food." Is because, "Humbaba said he ate a horse he other day and it tasted really tough and stringy so maybe we should just find a nice ox or something."
In all seriousness, horses are just not good food, but they are good work animals, so although it's possible that they would be used as food anyway, it's more likely they will be used as beasts of burden.
What if 11th century China sent expeditions to the Pacific Northwest? Suppose they travel down the Missouri River Lewis-and-Clark style and join the natives near Cahokia. After all, the eastward trip only took six months in 1806. In 1500, the population of China was 103 million, Mexico, 7 million, and US/Canada only 2 million. Could an Iron Age Renaissance in the central US area in the 11th century grow the population to 100 million by 1500?The only non-ASB way to have a roughly Chinese-sized civilization in the Mississippi River draiange by AD1100-1300 (the era of Cahokia dominance OLT) is to bring the Chinese here...and lots of them. Put a PoD or PoDs in place as early as 3000 BC that gives Chinese a reason to expore and exploit the Pacific, discover a new continent several thousand years ago, and decide it would be a good thing to set up settler colonies here. Bring over advanced metallurgy, old world draft animals, old world crops to supplement the native cultigens, the entire trappings of Chinese civilization, and eventually, a thousand years later establish their capital on the abandoned platform mounds of Cahokia after the local population has been largely Sinicized.
Sorry, there is simply no way an indigienous civilization that rivals China would even evolve on its own in the Mississippi Valley, given what we know about the time-depth, population densities, environment, and advanced cultures of prehistoric North America.
How is that not ASB?The only non-ASB way to have a roughly Chinese-sized civilization in the Mississippi River draiange by AD1100-1300 (the era of Cahokia dominance OLT) is to bring the Chinese here...and lots of them. Put a PoD or PoDs in place as early as 3000 BC that gives Chinese a reason to expore and exploit the Pacific, discover a new continent several thousand years ago, and decide it would be a good thing to set up settler colonies here. Bring over advanced metallurgy, old world draft animals, old world crops to supplement the native cultigens, the entire trappings of Chinese civilization, and eventually, a thousand years later establish their capital on the abandoned platform mounds of Cahokia after the local population has been largely Sinicized.
Sorry, there is simply no way an indigienous civilization that rivals China would even evolve on its own in the Mississippi Valley, given what we know about the time-depth, population densities, environment, and advanced cultures of prehistoric North America.
How is that not ASB?
The reason Eurasians looked at horses and thought, "We should use these as work animals and not as food." Is because, "Humbaba said he ate a horse he other day and it tasted really tough and stringy so maybe we should just find a nice ox or something."
In all seriousness, horses are just not good food, but they are good work animals, so although it's possible that they would be used as food anyway, it's more likely they will be used as beasts of burden.
If you accept the more current theories, probably in excess of 100 million in North & South America. Older theories hold to a significantly smaller number 10-20 millions (or even less)
1491 by Charles C Mann