Aussey said:I know you see the Gadsen purchase, but a lot of that is because of the Gila River...
Aussey said:But proud that he internationally embarrassed the House of Benedict-Orleans-Bragança???
benedict XVII said:Come on, Catholics take those kinds of things much more lightly. Look at Monaco and Prince Albert's natural child, ALbert II of Belgium and his adulterine daughter, or even Mitterrand and Mazarine who was at the front row for his burial (OK Mitterrand is not a King, but President of France is almost the same)
It's only in the US and the UK that people seem to care about the sex life of their politicians and royals...
Wendell said:-Why have the (departemento) on the Yucatan called Merid(i)a and not Yucatan?
Wendell said:-Why call Arizona that, and not Arizuma, a probable, more authentic variant?
Wendell said:Also, why are the borders in the northwest so different from those implemented by Mexico in OTL?
Wendell said:Will there be no "Atzlan"?
Wendell said:-Why call it Sierra and not Nevada?
Okay, I see now. But in your TL, it stays as Meridia?Wendell said:Merida is a city on the Yucatan Peninsula that shares its name with a town in Spain. It is labelled as Yucatan on your referenced maps.
That makes sense, I guess. I was thinking "Yucatano," or "Yucatanero," but if you want to know, Wikipedia might have that information as there is a Mexican state called Yucatan currently in OTL.Aussey said:It does...because I dont like the word Yucatan, and I dont know the adjective for Yucatan, besides the odd sounding Yucatanese
Do I understand correctly that Mexico has titular ties to Cascadia. Is the UCPA still around?Aussey said:Yes...it is also odd.
Any suggestions for the future (2005+)
Wendell said:Do I understand correctly that Mexico has titular ties to Cascadia. Is the UCPA still around?
wkwillis said:POD around 1805 and the Napoleonic invasions of Iberia wiping out the Spanish government.
The Mexican revolutionaries exile a bunch of Spanish to California and they find the mercury, the gold, the great valley, etc. Mexico attracts huge numbers of Hispanics from the coast of Peru, Chile, Bolivia, Ecuador, Venezuela, etc. Central America would stay part of Mexico to get some of the gold. Texas is settled by Mexicans and garrisoned by Mexican soldiers paid for with some more of that gold. The Mexican garrisons attract Mexican immigrants to Texas and the Anglos are always outnumbered. The stronger Mexican government is able to keep slavery out.
Later they buy the Oregon territory from the British and move more colonists there to grow cold climate foods for the California colonists, and fish, and lumber. Bolivian farmers grow lots of potatos. So do Argentines in the Willemette valley. And Chileans in what is now Utah. Britain needed the money for the war with Napoleon. So does Russia, which is how Mexico winds up with Alaska.
You get a Spanish North America with English and Portuguese bumps on the East Coast.
You could do away with it after 2005...Aussey said:As of the newest update, yes
I could see Mexico, New England, and maybe Canada partitioning the Communist state.Aussey said:I was thinking a revolution in 2000, with many countries, some going to Canada, some to Mexico, Some to New England, some forming a "Liberated States of America" some making their own nation....