Recent content by rubix

Assassinate Churchill

Why did Mexico declare war?

Why can't you accept that Germany would NOT win an attrition war with the USSR, especially with lend-lease? The USSR has a far greater manpower pool than Germany. Sorry, but it is the truth.

Britain gets nuclear weapons 1946-1949. Berlin along with Hitler is gone in the first blast. Germany surrenders or gets nuked more.

Hitler lost the war as soon as he started it. Britain had him in checkmate from day one and would eventually defeat him with or without help from the U.S. or USSR The best thing he could have done is surrender after the fall of France and pray Britain would be generous.

The Korean war and Vietnam war would not happen. Never mind my previous posts

I think the fact that the U.S. is giving the ROC warships would logically mean that the ROC is going to be able to use them.

It depends entirely on the ROC factor I think

Stalin might not even think that the ROC would get involved

It depends on Stalin and what his preconditions would be for North Korea's planned invasion maybe. It is very possible imo that it would still occur.

Whenever Britain develops the first batch of nuclear bombs would they give Germany the chance to surrender before they use them?

You are expecting the Red Army to essentially display a grasp of mechanized warfare comparable to the Germans overnight.:rolleyes: I would like to think there was an actual reason for their total breakdown at Barbarossa, and one which you choose to ignore.

Could Hitler kick people out of the Axis?

Even if D-day fails, there will be a D-day 2.0 soon after, probably. And if that fails, another and another.

Nuclear weapons are war winners. Though, there would need to be a lot of them stockpiled. One over Moscow, and goodbye Soviet government