USS Exeter, with Captain Tracy as commander was, of course, the ship that was found abandoned at the start of The Omega Glory IOTL - around Omega IV instead of Ebonia IV.
Indeed it was - and who wrote that episode? Gene Roddenberry. He's reusing those names here, "The Omega Glory" having never made it past the draft script phase ITTL.
NCW8 said:
AFAIR, The Omega Glory also reversed this formula, with a fight followed by Kirk's speech quoting from the pre-amble to the US Constitution.
Indeed so - I'd like to think that narrative linchpin would have been at the kernel of a story idea contributed by Roddenberry. Certainly it's not any
more ludicrous than Captain James T. Kirk dramatically reading the preamble to the United States Constitution,
as only he can. Never mind that it really
should have been the Declaration of Independence, or the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, or the Magna Carta, or the Universal Declaration of Human Rights...
NCW8 said:
By coincidence IOTL they both appeared as Star Fleet captains in the ST movies.
Metafictionally speaking, I assure you, it was
no coincidence
(In fact, not only do the redshirts and the crew of the
Exeter survive, but so does Paul Winfield!)
The only thing I will say on this is 'interesting times' are fascinating from outside but often not enjoyed much from inside.
Again, as a psephologist, more proportional systems simply aren't as interesting. If the polls are reasonably accurate, you've already got the rough composition of your legislature set in stone before the returns come in. Whether or not it may be
fair, it
certainly isn't exciting, you understand
stevep said:
Noticed a couple of typos, one in the section above, unless psephologically is something I've never met before.
Psephology: the study and analysis of elections, past and future. One of my other interests, shared by a rather larger contingent of this board's membership
stevep said:
Unless you know something about the Roman empire I don't.
I apologize for the misleading phrasing. What I meant to indicate was that one of the primary drives for expansion throughout the history of the Roman Empire was the need for more slaves (many of whom, as noted, did not survive long due to their use for hard labour - though I'm not nearly enough of an expert on classical history to determine whether this was a chicken or egg situation). The United States, though it was also expansionist, did
not view slavery and Manifest Destiny as hand-in-hand; quite the opposite, in fact. Basically, Ebonia IV is Planet Antebellum South, though with the obvious race reversal. Slavery as it existed in the classical world wouldn't make for as "neat" an allegory.
stevep said:
Love the idea of the
"complete summarized episode guide for all five seasons of
Star Trek".
Thanks, Steve! I look forward to writing it. I'll give myself an easy goal in hoping to have it all done in time for the show's 50th anniversary (September 8, 2016).
In all likelihood, I'll be done
long before then, but it never hurts to give yourself
plenty of slack when you're setting deadlines
I don't know about the man's personality but, with Star Trek as big as it is in TTL, if I were him I'd just say, "You know, I really love your show, I understand you using some aspects of my works, and while I'm not going to go after you for copyright, I would really love it if you could pay me back with just a brief cameo.
They might have to give a cameo to Isaac Asimov as well in that case. The Currents of Space is also based upon Southern Slavery with the slaves being very pale skinned compared to the slave-holders.
Intriguing suggestions, gentlemen - though if I were to have both Heinlein
and Asimov make cameo appearances, I'd
have to make room for Clarke too, now wouldn't I?
And thank you all for helping to prove my point about the universality of the allegorical role reversal. Asimov
and Heinlein prove that it's a standard of science-fiction.
---
Thanks to my consultant
vultan for pointing out something that I'd overlooked in posting the infobox for the 1978 election to the US House of Representatives...
Thus, I present to you a slightly reworked version. Note the replacement of the more moderate Rep. Flowers (who was elected to Senate) by the more...
doctrinaire Rep. Rarick in Louisiana. Also, and as is usually the case, the swing in the House was more drastic than it had been in the Senate, as you'll see next time! (And this time, I
really mean it.)