All right, I've been cracking down and doing some writing, in hopes of having the next update ready on or before the end of the month (August 31 at 11:59:59 PM EDT). The odds that I'll pull it off are reasonably good, and then it's only two more updates before the end of the cycle... at which time there will be several important announcements about the future of this timeline. Thank you all so much for your enduring and voracious interest in what I
still consider this idiosyncratic little story of mine.
Huh. Seems his name stuck with me more than it should've.
You should
really feel sorry for the Story Editor in between John D.F. Black and D.C. Fontana - his name was Steven W. Carabatsos, and he served in that position for the majority of the first season, writing two episodes (unfortunately for him, both were thoroughly average: "Court Martial" and "Operation -- Annihilate!"). He also revised "Miri" and was one of many who worked on "The City on the Edge of Forever"). He's one of those people whom nobody
ever seems to remember in connection with
Star Trek.
Even you Nigel have to admit he a Silly looking Alien.
I kinda like it (and again, consider how much better it'll look ITTL)...
Oh, I do. Perhaps not quite as bad as
Arcturus, who also appeared in
The Curse of Peladon. The best that can be said of them is that they tried to portray non-humanoid aliens.
But really, isn't that what
Doctor Who is
known for? Other than the wobbly sets, of course
So will there be Star Trek Movie in your Time Line?
No comment
^^^^^^^^^^^This. Which is what Star Trek needed more of, in all of it's incarnations.
The series proper
did have quite a few non-humanoids; I like to think that the movies, once they got the makeup flowing, "locked" the franchise into
Rubber Forehead Aliens - it doesn't
help, of course, that it's what Roddenberry wanted, and he was able to set the tone in such a way that his successors simply followed along.
And could you do a Update on Roddenberry and the Star Trek Cast and how their post Star Trek careers are going.
I've already been asked to do that, and we'll see if I can't make some room for it on the list of updates. Most of your other questions will be answered then.
I'd argue that TOS - both in OTL and in That Wacky Redhead's world - can be excused, given the limitations (both budgetary and technologically) it was acting under when it came to special effects (notwithstanding sidestepping attempts like with the Kelvans).
In
That Wacky Redhead, there's definitely more of a concerted effort to move away from this. Roddenberry and whatever he may have wanted is basically ignored - he has virtually no say in the show during its later seasons (the only episode he is credited as "writing" is the "story" for the two-part finale, which is basically just Coon and Fontana sitting in a room with him and asking how he'd like to see it end, and taking notes). Between Chang, Prohaska, and Henson, there are going to be a
lot more creatures in the later seasons ITTL - both miniatures and the full-body variety (traditional hand-puppet-style creatures would only be used for stationary life-forms, as in "The Man Trap" IOTL).
Something along those lines, if you can accept the idea of it being conceived earlier on, could work as the basis for an episode. It does seem like the kind of thing Harlan Ellison might be amenable to writing.
I like your story idea, but unfortunately, I'm not writing an ASB timeline
Harlan Ellison is
never going to return to
Star Trek - for one thing, he's working on
another show during the later years of its run (the anthology series "Far Beyond the Stars", which he characteristically trumpets as "
real science-fiction" whenever anyone mentions
Star Trek to him). Even though his primary beef is with Roddenberry, who is
very hands-off in later years, no doubt he's
also nursing a grudge against Desilu (since he's the type who could form a grudge against a gust of wind). They also won't want to overuse the Guardian - it reappears in "Yesteryear", where it is treated as a routine tool for historical research.
I guess that it would be possible to include the idea in a film in the late seventies, especially if increased interest in the space program has caused the theory to be popularised earlier than IOTL.
That's a very salient point - another theory which, from
my perspective, seems to have been around forever (the asteroid killing the dinosaurs - we even know where the
crater is nowadays), but is actually relatively recent (hence the famous question, "What killed the dinosaurs?"). Who knows which alternate theory
Star Trek might choose?