Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Discussion: After 1900

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 5th, 2004, 06:18 PM
tom tom is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Twinsburg, Ohio
Posts: 1000 or more
AIDS more infectious

Suppose AIDS still required blood transfusion or sexual activity or such to spread, but had nearly 100% chance of doing so, even for, say, oral sex.
What changes?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old January 5th, 2004, 06:40 PM
Xen Xen is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Republic of Appalachia
Posts: 1000 or more
There is almost no sex outside of marriage, the entire world becomes almost extremly sexually conservative. The organized religions have a field day with this.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old August 9th, 2006, 07:29 PM
Glen Glen is offline
Moderator & Left Hand of IAN
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 1000 or more
Other than the oral sex, the rate of HIV transmission through these methods is fairly high.

I think you would see some increases in infection rate, but perhaps not as much as you might think.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old August 9th, 2006, 10:07 PM
Dave Howery Dave Howery is offline
laughs at your pain
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Cheyenne WY
Posts: 1000 or more
mosquitos would be a real problem....
__________________
Never underestimate the power of a dark clown
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old August 10th, 2006, 12:31 AM
Glen Glen is offline
Moderator & Left Hand of IAN
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Howery View Post
mosquitos would be a real problem....
I don't believe that mosquitos were counted as vectors in this pod.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old August 12th, 2006, 12:44 PM
Saladin Saladin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Cornwall, UK
Posts: 514
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glen View Post
Other than the oral sex, the rate of HIV transmission through these methods is fairly high.

I think you would see some increases in infection rate, but perhaps not as much as you might think.
Sorry glen, but I really have to disagree with this comment. Go to the CDC site for truly accurate numbers, but in general terms, the transmission rateis about 5% for the recipient of anal sex, and about half that for the active partner; for vaginal sex it is about 3% and 1.5% and for oral-genital sex its about 1% or less if female; negligible if male
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old August 12th, 2006, 12:54 PM
Saladin Saladin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Cornwall, UK
Posts: 514
Quote:
Originally Posted by tom View Post
Suppose AIDS still required blood transfusion or sexual activity or such to spread, but had nearly 100% chance of doing so, even for, say, oral sex.
What changes?
Almost everything. For a start, the initial trickle of fatalities would very soon become a massive epidemic. The reason HIV was detected was because of a number of deaths in the gay community ... in your scenario, this number would be HUGE from the cross infections from places like fire island in the 1970s.

Research would be FAR more heavily funded because of the, in your scenario, very real risk of the human population crashing to VERY low levels. That being said, the funding would probably have already produced, if not an vaccine at least a fully effective treatment course.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.