|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
AIDS more infectious
Suppose AIDS still required blood transfusion or sexual activity or such to spread, but had nearly 100% chance of doing so, even for, say, oral sex.
What changes? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
There is almost no sex outside of marriage, the entire world becomes almost extremly sexually conservative. The organized religions have a field day with this.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Other than the oral sex, the rate of HIV transmission through these methods is fairly high.
I think you would see some increases in infection rate, but perhaps not as much as you might think. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
mosquitos would be a real problem....
__________________
Never underestimate the power of a dark clown |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't believe that mosquitos were counted as vectors in this pod.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sorry glen, but I really have to disagree with this comment. Go to the CDC site for truly accurate numbers, but in general terms, the transmission rateis about 5% for the recipient of anal sex, and about half that for the active partner; for vaginal sex it is about 3% and 1.5% and for oral-genital sex its about 1% or less if female; negligible if male
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Research would be FAR more heavily funded because of the, in your scenario, very real risk of the human population crashing to VERY low levels. That being said, the funding would probably have already produced, if not an vaccine at least a fully effective treatment course. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|