Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Discussion: After 1900

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 22nd, 2008, 09:27 AM
Derek Jackson Derek Jackson is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1000 or more
Anti Nazi agreement 1939

WI the USSR and the UK and France all saw just how evil and dangerous Hitler was and formed an alliance then.

Does Nazi Germany collapse for economic reasons?

Does Hitler still start a war?

If he goes to war between 1939 and 1941 against all three larger European powers how long does it last?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old February 22nd, 2008, 09:50 AM
mattw101 mattw101 is offline
Prince Palatine
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: People's Republic of South Yorkshire / Norse University of Jorvik
Posts: 344
I think an earlier POD is needed. Stalin's likely to be pretty pissed that he wasn't invited to Munich.
__________________
TL: The Withering Rose - A second war of the Roses in the 16th century!
Idea thread here!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old February 22nd, 2008, 11:27 AM
grdja83 grdja83 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 554
In early 1939. and late 1938. it might have happened. In freaking Churchill's Memoirs (so im not talking about "world radical socialist website source") he clearly states that:

After Hitler and Mussolini created the "anti Cominterna pact", Stalin was not only sending feelers, but openly trying to get UK and France to talk about a defensive pact against Hitler. UK and France refused time after time. They werent certain the war was unavoidable by diplomacy, it wasn't the right time. Poles and Czechoslovakia might object to Soviet troops eventually used against Germany from their soil.

I seriously think that between the lines I see that Churchil and most of West hoped for Nazis and Stalin's Bolseviks to exterminate eachother.

And so, after months of attempts to negotiate with UK and France, last of them in early summer of 1939. Stalin said fuck you and made a deal with Ribbentrop buying time.

And thats the Churchill's version of events. And you dont get more anticommunist than the Bulldog.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old February 22nd, 2008, 03:46 PM
CanadianGoose CanadianGoose is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Border of the Russian Canada, North of Fort York
Posts: 1000 or more
I happen to believe that grdja83 is up to something. To describe French and British attitude toward USSR at this point, follow this link:
http://www.google.ca/search?gbv=2&hl...bing+baku&meta=

According to De Gaulle, in winter of 1940 some "crazy heads that were thinking more of how to destroy Baku than of resisting Berlin."
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old February 22nd, 2008, 03:55 PM
Faeelin Faeelin is online now
Lord of Ten Thousand Years
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1000 or more
Send a message via AIM to Faeelin
The situation is a little bit more complicated then that.

The USSR was angling for the occupation and annexation of the Baltic States, with military bases in Eastern Poland and Finland. The West, naturally, balked.

Moreover, after the purges of the 1930s, there was doubt about whether or not the USSR's military would be effective. To some observers it looked like a giant with clay feet, and there were doubts about its ability to support an offensive into Poland.

The Polish, understandably, were leery about having Russian forces in their country.

Plus, the Soviets thought that the West wasn't really interested in defeating Hitler; they wanted to scare them off and come to a rapproachment.

So, IMO it's harder to fix than it first looks.
__________________
Quote:
Freedom was not just for the English, after all- it was for all men, even Papists.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old February 22nd, 2008, 04:00 PM
Wozza Wozza is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: London
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Faeelin View Post
The situation is a little bit more complicated then that.

The USSR was angling for the occupation and annexation of the Baltic States, with military bases in Eastern Poland and Finland. The West, naturally, balked.

Moreover, after the purges of the 1930s, there was doubt about whether or not the USSR's military would be effective. To some observers it looked like a giant with clay feet, and there were doubts about its ability to support an offensive into Poland.

The Polish, understandably, were leery about having Russian forces in their country.

Plus, the Soviets thought that the West wasn't really interested in defeating Hitler; they wanted to scare them off and come to a rapproachment.

So, IMO it's harder to fix than it first looks.
It's very hard. It certainly cannot be done by Chamberlain.

I think possibly something quite radical - a very bloody Prague Spring for instance, which led to the fall of Chamberlain, might do the trick.

Churchill as a replacement would be unlikely, but a Churchill Foreign Secretaryship and trip to Moscow might offer a chance.

It's all a bit off the wall though.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old February 22nd, 2008, 04:02 PM
mattw101 mattw101 is offline
Prince Palatine
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: People's Republic of South Yorkshire / Norse University of Jorvik
Posts: 344
Quote:
Originally Posted by Faeelin View Post
The situation is a little bit more complicated then that.

The USSR was angling for the occupation and annexation of the Baltic States, with military bases in Eastern Poland and Finland. The West, naturally, balked.

Moreover, after the purges of the 1930s, there was doubt about whether or not the USSR's military would be effective. To some observers it looked like a giant with clay feet, and there were doubts about its ability to support an offensive into Poland.

The Polish, understandably, were leery about having Russian forces in their country.

Plus, the Soviets thought that the West wasn't really interested in defeating Hitler; they wanted to scare them off and come to a rapproachment.

So, IMO it's harder to fix than it first looks.
That sums it up nicely.
__________________
TL: The Withering Rose - A second war of the Roses in the 16th century!
Idea thread here!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.