|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
No one knows who's behind 9-11
It would take some handwaving and PODs in leadership decisions, but...
What if 9-11 hadn't been able to have been tracked down to AQ? AQ runs it so secretely/well, that the links back to them are circumstancial at best, and then the post-event confusion makes it unclear who actually did it, with conflicting claims murkying up the waters, so to speak. What would be the post-event Butterflies if the US (and West) really didn't know who did it, with too many people claiming credit for it?
__________________
I am Dean_the_Young and I do NOT approve this message. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Meh, it's not like we really need PROOF of anything to initiate massive bombing runs.
![]() Seriously though, in the absence of proof, I'd imagine the blame would be placed squarely on Iraq's doorstep in order to justify invasion.
__________________
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
They kinda wanted the authorities to trace it back to them. Bin Laden wanted a US invasion of Afghanistan becuase he wanted to pull off another 'we defeated a Superpower using our islamic awesomeness!!!' and put the world back to the dark ages.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
..... |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|