1941: Hitler's Mediterranean strategy

0: Introduction
I was inspired to this thread by the latest 3rd Reich TL.

Since I don't believe, however, that Sealion could succeed, let's not even talk about a German invasion of North America, I'd like to try a different approach.

In the late spring of 1941, many people in Germany and elsewhere thought that Hitler (after having conquered Yugoslavia, Greece and Crete and with Rommel advancing in Egypt) would try to further proceed in this area, i.e. conquering Malta (no problem - unless Mussolini would insist that *his* soldiers must be the ones who take the island, then it could take longer), Cyprus (the Royal Navy suffered much from the fights around Greece and couldn't have prevented it - at least I read that), and Egypt; after that, he could decide whether to attack through the Nile valley (Sudan; Ethiopia, where some Italian troops were still fighting; Somalia; Uganda, Kenya?) or Palestine, Syria (where de Gaulle's Free French troops fought against Vichy; forgot when they won) and Iraq (remember the rebellion there). Not to forget the oil of Persia and Saudi Arabia... Even worse, since the Brits and Free French don't have the strongest army on Earth, the chances of the Germans seem to be pretty good. And without the Suez canal, Britain would be in trouble defending India (or Arabia, or East Africa). (Hmm, what about Asia? Would that matter?)

Of course, there's the big question: What would Russia do? Though they had acquired a lot of territory in the two years before (Eastern Poland, Baltic states, Bessarabia, parts of Karelia), Stalin had even more demands which included making Bulgaria a Soviet satellite (and that would've meant that they'd have Romania and its oil in a pinch). Hitler knew about that. If he wanted to spend a year in the Med, he would've to stop Stalin somehow. (He had proposed Stalin to form an anti-British alliance, planning to give Persia and India to Russia, but Stalin had other demands.) I don't think that Stalin would've attacked Germany in 1941 since the Red Army still suffered from the purges (I know some people claim he would, but too many of these people only want to make up an excuse for Hitler, so I'm careful). The relations between Germany and Russia could become worse, though.

Comments?
 
Just a couple of thoughts. By 1941 Malta was pretty well secure. Don't forget the RN has a fleet in the western Med as well as the east. If Malta is really going to fall, make it September-October 1940, as Britian is busy at home. You'd probably want to take it with the two German airborne divisions, in the initial phase, then backed up by the Italian navy, airforce, & army.

North Africa, though, is a tougher nut to crack than you think. The British may have only had one or two decent divisions there, but you have three Australian, one NZ, one South African, & two Indian divisions, not to mention various other countries like the Free French & Poles etc. But with Malta in Axis hands, the Germans & Italians in North Africa get a far better supply system going. This could be all that's required to push onwards to Suez & beyond. Still, it'll be one hell of a fight & German victory is far from certain.
 
I have a Nazi victory TL entitled "The East Has Fallen" where the Nazis knock Britain out of the war with the Mediterranean Strategy (the breaching of the Suez Canal and the fall of pro-British regimes in Iraq and Iran leads to Churchill's overthrow and a negotiated peace).

I think the Nazis could take Malta, though it would be extremely difficult owing to their naval weakness and Britain's naval strength. However, the seizure of Malta means that Rommel will have all the supplies he needs and the Brits are going to suffer...
 
Hitler attacks Malta in July of 1940, after shifting his airforce down to Italy by rail and air instead of the battle of Britain. The Italian army is airlifted onto Malta, an obsolete Italian battleship is grounded for fire support, (Do you know why I like to beach battleships? It's because they are worthless as ships, that's why, but they make superb portable coastal artillary.), and it's Crete all over again.
With Malta in Italian hands the next step is to move German troops into Libya. They have an escorted by aircraft convoy system set up, and move most of their subs down to the Mediterranean instead of to the British sub blockade. The British still have to convoy their ships and suffer that inefficiency, but they will be able to move more stuff around, except through the Mediterranean. That means that they can't reinforce their troops in Egypt as fast as Hitler can. They can get the tanks to Egypt by ship (the ones they didn't have in France because they hadn't got around to sending them their after only nine months), and the aircraft by Africa, but the troops are what they have on hand.
September is when the Italians and the Germans attack Egypt. With the Germans as assault and block troops, the Italians as line troops, and the air superiority of the German Luftwaffe, the defence is broken and the rally point for the British is on the other side of the Sinai. It's logistics. The canal is hardly usefull as a defence with no logistics support on the other side and no fortifications.
Meanwhile the Iraqi rebellion and the Vichy French aren't making it any easier for the British there. They are even harder to support, so they make their way across the desert to evacuation, blowing up the oil fields all the way. By spring the British are actually on the oil fields and at Yemen, the Mediterranean is clean of troops and airbases, and the Germans are in the Red Sea. The canal is full of mines and sunken ships and will take a while to clear, but they can start supporting submarines in the Indian Ocean directly.
In 1941 in May they have to decide whether to take Russia or the Gulf. They might try to take both and fail in both, or they might try to take one. Don't know what they do, but this POD assumes that he will attempt to take the Middle East, so I assume that he spends the winter of 1940/1941 moving troops and tanks and attack aircraft in.
Whereupon he takes the Gulf in the fall of 1941, when it's cool enough for tanks to work. The British and their Indian troops are overrun by a dozen German divisions supplemented by a dozen Italian and Arab divisions. The Arabs secure the lines of supply, the Italians are on the flanks, and the Germans do the attacking.
They take the oil fields and Yemen, and are able to start repairing them immediately. They will be able to ship oil by tanker around the Arabian peninsula very quickly, if the ships in their convoys are not sunk by subs. They can build a railroad to ship oil by tanker cars. They can build pipelines and use a hundred Arab divisions (the Germans promissed the Arabs that they would be independent, which is what got them to change sides) to guard them against the commandos and native troops the British left behind. It will be expensive, but it will work.
This assumes that the Germans are on the defensive in the Balkans and that Stalin does not attack in 1941. In 1942 Stalin has finished his reorganisation, his mobilization, and his reequipping. When the war starts he is using twice as many troops, twice as many tanks (and a fourth of them are T34s and KV-1s because the factories are not overrun and production is uninterrupted), twice as many aircraft, and about eight times the combat capability.
It doesn't look good for Germany. Losing Rumania pretty much offsets the gain of the Gulf oil, and the Gulf oil is farther away. Losing the Rumanian oil refineries is pretty grim too. We wind up with a war that is fought on Western European soil instead of Eastern European soil, that leaves Russia undamaged to the most part except some trivial air raids, and in complete control of the continent of Europe.
But the Arabs are a united population and country. Algeria and Tunisia surrender to the Arabs to keep the Russians from shooting them. Turkey, Afghanistan, and Iran join the Arab alliance to keep the Russians out.
 
I agree that Germany trying to take Egypt would represent a huge diversion of effort which would compromise their eventual attack on Russia. And even if they'd succeeded, what would they have gained? The UK was sending convoys around Africa anyway, and was getting its fuel (IIRC) from the USA. And fighting all the way down from Egypt to India would have probably been an even worse prospect for the Wehrmacht than Russia - just think of the supply lines!

An attack on Malta OTOH could probably have been managed if Hitler were determined enough. I do include that in my novel The Foresight War...

Tony Williams: Military gun and ammunition website and Discussion forum
 

Redbeard

Banned
Malta's role in the Mediterranean war probably was more a morale booster to the allies than a practical strategic asset. Malta certainly was the base for some valiant action from RN submariners or FAA/RAF aircrews, but actually the Axis stacked far more supplies in the North African ports than they could get forward to the frontlines. So it was rather Axis logistic incompetence and insufficiency than Allied cation from Malta that contributed to the Axis defeat. But I think Malta was used by the British to show themselves and the rest of the world (incl.USA) that they could defy the Germans. In that context Malta had a tremendous strategic importance, but still compared to BoB or Singapore -the first had USA trust in British resolve and IMO it was here that the USA decided to get into the war - sooner or later, somehow (and no matter of Malta fate). The later lost the British their Empire.

IMHO the German activity in the Med. basically was a diversion from their main strategic goals which were knocking out USSR and France and plundering everybody within arms length. But forcing the British to spend their main war effort in the Med. area until Normandy was very handy for Japan and in reality a precondition for the Japanese campaign in SEA.

I don't think there would have been many if any chances of the Germans advancing beyond the Suez. As Tony has said the allied already supplied their forces in the ME around the Cape, and in 1941 UK actually outproduced Germany, Italy and Japan combined in all vital areas. But an Axis major operation into the ME would have diverted resources to a critical degree making barbarossa impossible and maybe even compromise Germany's ability to defend herself from a Soviet attack. But if the Germans defeat the Soviets in late 41 or early 42, as they probably thought they could before Barbarossa, then things certainly begin to look gloomy for the western allies too.

Regards

Steffen Redbeard
 
1: August/September 1941
@Redbeard: Britain outproduced the Axis powers put together? I can't believe that. I had guessed that they came behind the US, Russia, Germany and maybe Japan.
@Tony: True, the Wehrmacht fighting somewhere deep in Africa or Asia would have trouble with long supply lines, but so would the Allies.
@wkwillis: Thanks for your story. Only one thing: If Stalin has twice the tanks, twice the soldiers and twice the airforce, that shouldn't add to eight times the power, but twice (maybe thrice, if you consider that the tanks are also better).

And now again. It's July 1941. Hitler has just defeated Yugoslavia and Greece. Crete is in German hands (but they lost a lot of good paratroopers there). Tobruq is besieged, Rommel is standing at Sidi Barrani. Now Hitler makes the important decision: Barbarossa is delayed for 1942, he'll attack in the Med first.

Since the troops are already in the right place (in the Balcans), they only have to transport them to the other side of the Med. At the same time, the attacks against Malta become stronger. Everywhere in the Eastern Med, the Luftwaffe attacks RN ships.

In August, the Axis troops in North Africa are strong enough to attack and take Tobruq. Now the way from Tripolis to the front is free. Rommel who's impatient attacks the Brits even before all of his troops have arrived. Still successful, the Brits are driven back to El Alamein.
In September, Rommel is ready for the final attack. He know has 10 divisions ready, plus some Italians, against 7+ (I guess Churchill would send them some, too, after they can guess what the Germans are up to - BTW, what did the Brits think before Barbarossa Hitler was planning? Anybody knows?) of the Empire, plus a few others. Numerical superiority and Rommel's strategic talent are too much, before the battle becomes hopeless, they start to retreat. At the banks of the Nile, they are ready for the next stand. Fighting in the fertile river valleys and big cities is a completely new situation for Rommel (so I have to make things up). Let's say, after a big battle end of September, Alexandria is taken. The Brits destroy the bridges, but that's nothing that can't be repaired. Middle of October, Cairo and all of the Nile delta are in Axis hands. A few days later, the remaining British troops are behind the Suez canal.

Tomorrow, you'll get more...
 
No. Britain alone (sans empire) had over three times the industrial power of Japan. Britain was something like equal to Germany on its own, a good deal more with the Empire.

In a one-on-one in the Pacific between Japan and Britain, Japan wouldn't stand a chance.

Max Sinister said:
@Redbeard: Britain outproduced the Axis powers put together? I can't believe that. I had guessed that they came behind the US, Russia, Germany and maybe Japan.
@Tony: True, the Wehrmacht fighting somewhere deep in Africa or Asia would have trouble with long supply lines, but so would the Allies.
@wkwillis: Thanks for your story. Only one thing: If Stalin has twice the tanks, twice the soldiers and twice the airforce, that shouldn't add to eight times the power, but twice (maybe thrice, if you consider that the tanks are also better).
 
Max Sinister said:
@Redbeard:
@Tony: True, the Wehrmacht fighting somewhere deep in Africa or Asia would have trouble with long supply lines, but so would the Allies.
Nope. You forget that Germany wasn't fighting the UK, but the UK, its Empire and the Commonwealth. Britain had all the resources of India to call on, and the Australians and New Zealanders would have found it much easier to get there than to the UK. So as the German supply lines lengthened as they travelled east, the British Empire and Commonwealth ones shortened.

Tony Williams: Military gun and ammunition website and Discussion forum
 
2: October to December 1941
@Abdul: Hmm. You've got a link? I'd like to check the numbers.

OK, story continued.
Rommel's victory in the Nile delta made the situation for the empire difficult. Their troops in Africa and the Middle East now are disconnected from each other, the Germans control the important harbor of Alexandria, and without the Suez canal, the most important connection from Britain to India is cut. They managed to bring some support troops from India, but at the same time, since they control Egypt's biggest cities, the Nazis start to recruit Arabs willing to fight against the Brits. There's even unrest in Churchill's war cabinet. Some ministers and MPs around Halifax point out that Britain can't fight this war alone forever. Churchill resists: "It's not over yet!"

Hitler now has to make a decision: Attack in the South, through the Nile valley, aiming for Sudan and Ethiopia, or East? Since he wants to gulf oil, he quickly decides for the East. Rommel crosses the Suez canal and conquers the Sinai peninsula. The Italians and Arabs attack in the South, but are stopped at the height of El Faiyum and Beni Suef. At the end of October, the Germans stand near the little city of Gaza.
Now, Churchill exchanges several messages with Jewish leaders like Ben Gurion. The Jews now may officially form an army to fight against the Germans. Since he mustn't anger the Arabs too much, he makes Ben Gurion promise that Arabs have to keep full rights in case a state of Israel should be founded after the war. As fast as possible, the Jews raise troops. They don't exactly have the best arms, but are eager to fight against the Nazis. Southern Palestine (the Negev desert) is conquered by Germany, but then the Brits and Jews manage to stop them somehow, often simply by bluffing (did you know that empty gas canisters pulled over the ground sound much like moving tanks? I'm not kidding, the Israelis invented that trick during their war of independence). News spread fast: Though Roosevelt doesn't declare war on Germany, he supports the Jewish brigades where it's possible. Many Jews in America (emigrates and natives) volunteer to fight in Palestine, others collect more money than ever to buy arms and transport them. Even non-Jews join their rows (many of them are veterans of the Spanish civil war or other socialists).

Middle of November, Hitler is getting furious since Rommel didn't break the lines yet. He demands a victory, or else. Rommel manages to find a way: Instead of attacking Palestine directly, he lets his troops march into Transjordania. One week later, Amman is conquered. It's easy to see what Rommel is up to: He wants to enclose the Jews and Brits in a pocket and forces them to fight on two fronts. They still manage to hold the line along the Jordan and the heights of Golan. End of November, Rommel wins a battle against Free French troops and approaches Damascus. About that time, anti-British rebellions start in Iraq (again). Hitler thinks that the time has come and orders to take Cyprus.

In the first week of December, things look bleak for Britain. Half of Cyprus and most of Syria are in German hands. On December 6th, they reach the coast of Lebanon. Palestine is cut off, while the Germans in Syria approach the rebels in Iraq. Again, Churchill exchanges messages with Ben Gurion, asking whether he wants to evacuate his troops from Palestine. Ben Gurion answers: "We're ready to die for Israel!" Churchill tells him: "I hope you know that we can't support you forever." Ben Gurion: "As long as our volunteers will run the German lines, we'll stand and fight."
What they don't know: Hitler just ordered Rommel not to attack the Palestine pocket but only to clean up Syria and Mesopotamia. "We've got the harbors of Syria, now we need the oil!" he commands. He also orders that some Luftwaffe divisions are to be stationed in the North of Syria and Iraq - for an attack against the oil fields of Baku.

Then, everything changes with Pearl Harbor happening...
 
3: Early 1942
Thanks Matt!

I just saw that I completely forgot what Stalin was doing all the time. Here it is:

While Rommel conquers Egypt, Stalin repeatedly bugs Hitler with new demands. He wants Romania to give up land at the Danube mouth and the Bukovina; he wants a military pact with Bulgaria; he wants Japan to give up its rights for coal and oil in North Sachalin; and he points out that the Soviet Union also needs more influence in Turkey.

Behind the stage, Hitler tries to get more time. He knows he can't attack Russia before May 1942 - and that he can't wait another year, it's now or never. But he neither wants to anger his allies nor he wants a Russia that's too strong. He tries to stall Stalin. He doesn't want to give in again, after Russia already got half of Poland, Bessarabia and the Baltic states. He also points out that he's got no influence on Japan's inner affairs. He tries again to offer Stalin Persia, Afghanistan and India for an anti-British alliance. But that's not really what Stalin wants now.

But since he doesn't want to make Stalin suddenly suspicious, he slowly agrees, piece for piece. In the fall of 1941, the Romanian border again is "corrected" a bit in Russia's favor. After Pearl Harbor, Hitler gives Stalin free hand in North Sachalin. Stalin who's sure that the Japanese will be to afraid to attack Russia after the border clash of 1939, puts his hand on the mines in Sachalin. Hitler asks the Japanese whether they would join a war against Russia under the new circumstances, but the answer is No - Japan doesn't need Siberian territory, they want SE Asia. The relationship between Germany and Japan cools down. Hitler decides not to join their war against the US - at least, not yet.

In the first six months, the war in the Pacific is pretty much as OTL - Japan conquers Hong Kong, Malaya, the Philippines, Burma, most of Indonesia and many Pacific islands. Singapur also falls in this TL. American resistance is somewhat stronger, since they don't have troops sent to North Africa, OTOH Burma is conquered faster since Britain has less troops available.

Churchill is under heavy pressure again - several people want him to make peace with Germany to be able to defend the Empire against Japan. But he resists since he's sure that the Allies will win with America's help, and the public of Britain believes him. Still, the situation is hard. During December, the Germans have won in Cyprus, swept Syria and are attacking in Mesopotamia. When the new year begins, they control Bagdad. In February, they have reached the gulf at Basra. The oil fields they conquered, however, are unusable after the Brits destroyed them. Now Hitler contacts the king of Saudi Arabia for an alliance. The king is unsure; not allying with Germany might mean a German occupation, but it's not too sure that Germany will win at the end, so he says neither yes or no. Rommel concludes his victories by conquering Kuwait. Since Saudi Arabia doesn't want German troops on its soil/sand, they can't attack the remaining British oilfields in Bahrain and Qatar directly, so they have to attack with the Luftwaffe only.

Meanwhile, Stalin against asks friend Adolf for a pact with Bulgaria. Finally exhausted, Hitler agrees to let him have some bases there, if Russia agrees to respect Bulgaria's sovereignity in every other way - planning to kick them out when it's time with official Bulgarian help. Stalin gives his OK and now wants to know about Turkey. Hitler lets Ribbentrop ask secretly whether Turkey would join the Axis' cause and promises them that Georgia and Armenia could become Turkish again. The Turks disagree, the new Turkey is supposed to be a national state but not an empire. Still, they don't wish for Russian troops at the Bosporus. To confuse Stalin, Hitler asks what Stalin would think about dividing the Turkey between Italy and Russia and occupying the Bosporus together. Meanwhile, Churchill wonders what the hell Hitler is up to.

In March 1942, a lucky Israeli diversion attack drives the Germans a few kilometers back; the Jews now control all of the important heights of Golan. Once again Hitler bites a carpet and threats to attack the Palestine pocket with chemical weapons. Churchill OTOH tells him that in this case he'd throw all of Britain's chemical weapons on german cities, so Hitler retreats.

In other ways, the spring of 1942 around the Med is pretty quiet - except for the perpetual bombing against the remaining British oilfields and a few fights in the Nile valley. But now, the Germans have made the Suez canal usable and start to attack with their subs in the Red Sea...
 

Redbeard

Banned
Hi Max

I really stared too the first time I saw the figures, but here they are (Source: John Ellis, The Word War II Data Book). Empire not included in UK figures:

1941 tank production:
UK: 4841
Germany: 3790, Italy: 595, Japan: 595, Axis combined: 4980

1941 artillery production (incl. AA and AT):
UK: 16700
Germany: 11200, Italy: ?, Japan: 2250, Axis combined: 13450

1941 miltary aircraft production (incl. trainers):
UK: 20084
Germany: 11776, Italy: 3503, Japan: 5088, Axis combined: 20367

1941 warships commisioned:
UK: 871
Germany:134, Italy: 11, Japan: 2 (?), Axis total: 147

1941 merchant ship production (gross tons):
UK: 1.185.894
Germany: ?, Italy: 96.999, Japan: 210.373

The British production climaxed in 1941, but the German rose until 1944 and eventually above the British in tanks and aircraft (but not artillery). Japan and Italy kept being hopeless, although Japan leveled UK in aircraft production in 1944 (but declined sharply after that).

Regards

Steffen Redbeard - getting high on statistics - an occupational injury ;)
 
OK, to start with, there is no war in Yugoslavia and Greece. Italy attacked Greece in after being defeated in Libya. In this ATL, Italy has German help and instead of being defeated, it wins. Egypt is a lot more interesting than Greece, and if the Mediterranean is an Italian sea, why go after Greece at all? You hardly need to worry about your flanks then! Yugoslavia was for German transit rights to attack Greece. No war with Greece, no war with Yugoslavia.
Second, there is no war in the Golan after the fall of Baghdad. There is nothing in the Golan. It is an isolated chunk of mountains full of Arab shepherds.
Third, if the Israelis join the British, the Arabs join the Germans. The British defeated the Iraqi rebels because the rest of the Arab soldiers didn't want to fight the British. They feared the Germans more.
Fourth, if Aden is still British, it's going to be difficult to get subs into the Indian Ocean. The subs have to run a gauntlet of antisub aircraft. They can travel at night in a rather limited area. When a sub starts down, they are being hunted all the way through, and they have a long way to go back. Figure the real Indian Ocean war doesn't start till the loss of Aden. Until then the subs stay blockading Britain.
The Indian Ocean didn't have critical supplies for the British war effort. Oil came across the Atlantic. Sending the subs 1,000 miles to attack the occaisional British ship when there were twenty times as many in the Atlantic 100 miles away...
Fifth, Stalin does have eight times the power in 1942 as in 1941. His military production was increasing in both quantity (as much in 1941/42 as in 1936/41) and in quality. A T-34 is so much better than a T-26 that there is no comparison. The same goes for aircraft. Artillary did not advance so much. Finally, if 100 people fight 200 people, the power factor is eight to one. It's the cube of the difference, not the square or the arithmetic difference. You can flank them and simply whittle them down. Your 200 kill 50 of them while they kill 25 of you, leaving it at 50 to 175, and it get's worse. This is not true once your firepower density hits one machinegun every 100 yards and one antitank gun every 1000 yards, but below that it is true.
Meanwhile you have had three times as long to recruit and train your Moldovian troops so you can eventually recruit the Rumanians after you overrun them, so you can use them eventually against the Germans in 1943 at the fall of Berlin, or when crossing the Rhine in 1944. Or maybe when you cross the channel in 1945? Or the Atlantic in 1950?
 
1. In TTL there was a war in Yugoslavia and Greece, the POD is 1941, not 1940. Tp point it out: The POD is exactly after Crete.
2. Today, the Golan is important for Israeli defense against Syria. I thought it wouldn't hurt to use this area.
3. In OTL, there also fought some Jews on British side. TTL, there are more, but still.
4. Yes, Aden is still British. I didn't specify Hitler would send all of the wolfpacks there. A few to cut off eventual support for the Brits in Southern Egypt and Sudan.
5. I still say eight times is too much. Besides, in OTL 1942, the Germans started in the South with about as many men and arms as the Soviets had. They still managed to conquer quite a bit, so I guess they were better in the average.
Oh, and the last paragraph is simply unbelievable. I don't think that the Moldavians would've turned into willing Red Army men if even Russians and Ukrainians welcomed the Germans as liberators (only at the beginning!). They were ethnic Romanians and didn't like Stalin. And besides, the Red Army was strong, but they weren't supermen. Crossing the channel in 1945 is bull, to say the least. BTW, I still say that Stalin wouldn't have attacked first, at least not while Germany still was strong.
 
Just as an aside, has anyone ever found a reference to any WI Nazi Mediterranean strategy that pre-dates the mid-to-late 1970's?

I'm asking because the first time I heard of it was in an article written for a magazine called The General. That particular magazine was published by the Avalon Hill - a wargame company. A 'Med' strategy or a 'Hitler Goes South' strategy is a nice gambit for the Axis player to use in Avalon Hill's Third Reich game.

It would be interesting to see which came first; the gambit for a wargame or the "Nazi's Could Have Won Doing This" AH idea.


Bill
 
4: Barbarossa, 1942
OK, here we go... operation Barbarossa starts!

During the last year, Germany had a lot of time to produce new weapons and train new soldiers to replace the ~20 divisions fighting in Africa and the Middle East. (Their work in Germany now is being done by KZ prisoners, POWs and other foreigners.) The Russian production of weapons has increased even faster, though.

On May 1st, while the Russians celebrate their Labor Day, the attack begins. From the Baltic the the Black Sea, the Wehrmacht crosses the Russian border. Russian cities as far as Sevastopol are bombarded by the Luftwaffe. More than 2000 Russian planes are destroyed on the ground. Stalin is shocked and can't believe Hitler has traited him. Two things are different, though: 1. The Russian bases in Bulgaria are overwhelmed by the Bulgarian army. Bulgaria and Russia are officially at war, other than OTL. 2. Before the attack in Europe begins, German bombers start from their bases in northern Syria and Iraq. Their aim is Baku. Though they are discovered before the bombing begins, Stalin forbids shooting down the Germans - he still believes it's nothing but a provocation. When he knows he's wrong, the oilfields of Baku are nothing more but a sea of fire. At the same day, German-Arab troops cross the Persian border, aiming for the oilfields in SW Persia and Azerbaijan (sp?). Persia starts to mobilize its army, which makes somehow a counterweight for the Arabs fighting on German side.

During the first week, Soviet defense is confused. The mass of the troops that were concentrated too near the border are encircled and defeated. Germany and its Allies proceed much as OTL.

After the few first days, Stalin is finally ready to defend his country against the Nazis. Defense is organized, inept generals are slowly exchanged, and he talks with Churchill and Roosevelt. British troops (from India) and Russians (from Turkestan) march into Persia to help defending it against Germany. They all know: If Hitler should manage to get the oilfields of Baku, he's almost unstoppable. The Russians are still better armed than in 1941 OTL, but they suffer from lacking oil after the bombing of Baku. Roosevelt promises to help.

The first month of the war is still promising for Hitler. The Baltic states are conquered, so are Minsk, the former Polish territories and Bessarabia. Some hundred thousands Red Armists are captured. Still, where they have fuel for their tanks, the Soviets manage to fight the Germans back in some places. But their reserves are running out fast.

In June, the Germans have reached the Dnepr. Some generals propose to stop at this point to preserve the German gains. Hitler declines, he wants the total victory over Russia and is sure that Russia has to break down. He isn't completely wrong: Russia already lacks oil, though they are repairing the oil rigs in Baku (now defended by as many planes as possible) building up new wells in the "second Baku" east of the Ural and start to receive lots of oil from the US via Vladivostok. The next month is going to become the toughest for Russia, though. In this situation, Churchill and Stalin agree for a special joint operation: Some Russian divisions are sent up to the North, to Murmansk, where general Dietl is attacking from Narvik. At the same time, the RN and RAF start attacks around Norway. On June 22nd, they land around Narvik. The German operations in the North are disturbed, and the route from Britain to Murmansk is secure. Hitler is furious, again.

In other places, however, Germany is still winning. SW Persia is in their hands, and only all available powers of Russia and Persia can prevent them from crossing the border in the south. They conquered Kiev and Smolensk, cut Leningrad off and made millions of POWs so far. The "Stalin line" is broken. Hitler thinks that there's enough time and makes the same strategic mistake as OTL: He orders to attack in the South, the Ukraine. However, meanwhile Russia organized enough fuel to make its T-34s running and manages to make the Germans slower. They still proceed in the Eastern Ukraine and the Krim, but time is running away. At the end of August, they finally reach the Donez. Hitler is satisfied and now orders to attack Moscow itself.

This time, the Germans are not hampered by the weather, but by the stronger Red Army. Though they still proceed, they are getting even slower. They break the first defense line from Kaluga to Kalinin, 100 kilometers before Moscow. But again, they have to see that they only come frustratingly close to Moscow without conquering it. The city of Tula with its machine factories south of Moscow is conquered, but the factories aren't usable anymore - they've been brought to somewhere east of the Ural. And now, the raining period is beginning, which is helping the Russians even more.

A few weeks later, however, the temperature is falling, and the Russian mud is freezing. This is the last chance for Hitler to win the war. Everything is thrown against Moscow. The second defense line is broken, the Germans reach the outskirts of the city. There's panic in Moscow. Even Stalin wonders whether he can hold the capital. But for now, he puts down the panic and stays in Moscow. Since he knows that Japan won't attack, Siberian troops are defending the West. Hitler doesn't dare to storm the city, so he orders to besiege it. The Wehrmacht now has reached the borders of the city in the South and the West, but they can't break through. Finally, the beginning winter makes them unable to attack anyway. Only in the South, they make some gains. Sevastopol is besieged, Rostov and the Kuban peninsula are conquered, Voronesh is reached. Then, the attack stops. The Wehrmacht is better equipped for the winter this time, but far from being as good as the Red Army. Things are going to be difficult...
 
Max, you are right. The POD in 1941, late spring. So Hitler's troops are on the border with Russia, but haven't attacked. They stay in their positions for another year and attack in 1942, on May 1st. The mud season is over by then in 1942, unlike 1941 when the Germans had to wait till June 22nd. Hitler just leaves them there while he spends a year conquering the Mediterranean, and depriving the British of oil, and getting bombers in range of Baku.
OK, so far no problem
But Russia still has produced tens of thousands of T-34s and KV-1s. The Russian factories are still churning out tanks in Kiev and Tula and Leningrad and haven't been disrupted by being moved so far, the army doubles in size again just like it was in the process of doing, the airforce replaces it's obselete aircraft with the modern varieties, just like the tanks, the ammunition keeps piling up, the new defence lines from 9/39 have 2 years and eight months to be completed, instead of 1 year and ten months, the doubling of the size of the Russian army means it has to be fought instead of maneuvered around, the armored forces have been concentrated again as they were in the process of being, the regimental/divisional shuffle going on has finished, the troups from the winter war and the Manchurian incident have been rotated through the army as they are reassigned, the Transiberian has been upgraded, and the new factories in the Urals outside bomber range have been finished.
Everything just keeps on going like it was going in OTL, for another ten months.
Britain is not yet out of the war. They've lost Egypt and the canal, and the Levant coast, Malta, Cyprus, the Gulf, but not Aden.
The cost to the Germans of doing all this is less than their ability to conscript workers from industry and rearm them, and replace them with slave laborers and loot from occupied Europe. No problem with any of the above. I assume Malta and Cyprus were abandoned, and Cyprus was evacuated. Maybe Cyprus is now Turkish.
And America has had it's post 5/40 rearmament period extended from 12/41 to 5/42, which means the Phillipines and Wake and Guam have been fortified and garrisoned.
Only a year to integrate the Moldovian troops into their army? Right. They won't be capable of fighting. The Ukrainian and Belarussians from Poland are integrated into the Russian army. The Polish units forming up will be somewhat capable. We know that the Balts didn't fight well for the Russians.

I assume that with the Russians unattacked, the Japanese are just going to sit there and wait for the situation to improve. Not that it will improve, but they can hope. They will have run down their oil reserves more than in OTL. Their limitation was the ability of their tankers to move the oil, not in buying it. The Netherlands Indies and Burma were their only oil sources. They could not ship oil from anywhere else because we, the British, and the Norwegians wouldn't lease them the tankers and they hadn't built enough because they were concentrating on warships. I assume that in the ten months the Japanese make no major changes in policy.
Britain stays in the war unless the Japanese attack and leave the US across their supply lines. Or attack the US six months earlier, or wait till 12/41 to attack as in OTL. Earlier, at the same time, or later.

So twice as many Russian soldiers, twice as well armed, twice as well trained, and twice as well dug in, twice as well informed about German capabilities, but just as uninformed about German intentions, are going to sit there and wait for the Germans to attack into their teeth.

It's going to be Kursk.
 
Last edited:
WK,

Thing is, Soviet tank doctrine at the beginning of Barbarossa involved the spreading of tanks throughout infantry forces rather than the "armored spearheads" proposed by Tukchavesky and later used in the Blitzkrieg. The Soviets started to defeat the Germans when they figured out how to do that and started doing unto the Germans what the Germans did unto them.

Unless the Soviets change their tank doctrine, sheer numbers of tanks won't help nearly as much. Individual tank units associated with infantry forces might do better, but I still think they'll be overrun.

You say the Soviets were concentrating their armored forces? I never heard of that, and I just finished "Russia's War" by Overy.

Plus, Stalin impeded the Soviet responses to the initial German moves b/c he was afraid of "provocation." He even had an NKVD guy arrested who reported German tanks outside of Moscow, and that was months after Barbarossa. The Baku situation seems to work, as will the initial German penetration.
 
5: Pacific theater, 1942
OK. So far we have the Germans conquered more territory than OTL, but still not won, but being stuck around Moscow and in Persia. But now let's take a look on what Japan has done so far.

In May 1942, the Japanese can't win the battle of the Coral sea, as in OTL. For the first time, their advance is stopped. After the Americans deciphered their code, their situation starts to get worse. Though they still advance in Burma and China and even took two Aleutian islands, they also lose at Midway and can't win at Guadalcanal.

In August, they try (desperate times...) a new strategy. Since the Germans are standing in Persia and Britain is in a more difficult situation than OTL, they try a strike against "the soft underbelly of the Allies", i.e. India. All available infantry troops are relocated to Burma.

In September, the new offensive begins. The Japanese army crosses OTL India-Birma/Myanmar border and invades Bengal. Their advance starts slowly, but when they leave the mountains, it gets faster. Churchill is very concerned. If India should fall, the British Empire will be reduced to a shadow of its former self, and the Germans could unite with the Japanese. Roosevelt understands the situation. After having talked with the generals, he decides to send troops to India to support Britain. Since Germany and the US aren't at war, there are many troops available. After the planning has been done, US troops are shipped to India, mostly Calcutta.

In October, there's another critical moment. Japanese troops manage to land on badly defended Ceylon, advancing slowly though. US navy presence in Indian ocean strengthened. In November, Japanese advance in Ceylon and Bengal is halted. Now, Operation Torch (not the same as OTL) begins. The united British-American troops attack the Japanese before Calcutta, driving them back. While Guadalcanal isn't decided yet, the Indian theater looks promising. During the winter 1942/43, Bengal and Ceylon are reconquered. Danger of the Axis powers uniting is averted, for now and forever.
 
Top