Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Discussion: Before 1900

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 3rd, 2007, 04:51 AM
Karinthos Karinthos is offline
Keeper of the Garden
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Over there *points there*
Posts: 27
What if Einstien never was born?

Honesly wat would happen to the world if Einstien was never born, would that mean the end of the world as we know it? It would mean that there would be a world in which the Germans have a nucleur bomb and that famous equation would not exist. So would it in a term "fuck up" the world? or have a positive affect on the world?
__________________
I saw a guy run into a building screaming "LEEEEEROY JEEENKINS", and then the building exploded!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old December 3rd, 2007, 04:52 AM
Karinthos Karinthos is offline
Keeper of the Garden
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Over there *points there*
Posts: 27
lol

LOL wrong place! ment after 1900s
__________________
I saw a guy run into a building screaming "LEEEEEROY JEEENKINS", and then the building exploded!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old December 3rd, 2007, 04:58 AM
Archdevil Archdevil is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 635
He was born before 1900, so you're right.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old December 3rd, 2007, 05:24 AM
narris narris is offline
smells like barbequed shrimp
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 230
Well, technically the Germans would not be able to create an atom bomb without the theory of relativity, and without Einstein, that theory would probabbly never have surfaced. Well, it probabbly would have eventually, but mabye not in time for the war.
__________________
Damn the photon-torpedos, full speed ahead!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old December 3rd, 2007, 05:27 AM
Rockingham Rockingham is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Rockingham, Australia
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by narris View Post
Well, technically the Germans would not be able to create an atom bomb without the theory of relativity, and without Einstein, that theory would probabbly never have surfaced. Well, it probabbly would have eventually, but mabye not in time for the war.
This isn't a DBWI.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old December 3rd, 2007, 05:48 AM
David S Poepoe David S Poepoe is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: El Segundo, California
Posts: 1000 or more
I don't think you need the theory of relativity in order to build an atomic bomb or even hypothesize a chain reaction.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old December 3rd, 2007, 11:41 PM
the_lyniezian the_lyniezian is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Wherever I happen to be
Posts: 1000 or more
Certainly relativity would not have been discovered so soon- although perhaps given the work of Lorentz (whose transforms are an integral part of relavivity) it probably would be a matter of time. Quantum theory would also be considerably set back, given Einsteins pioneering work in using it to exlain the photoelectric effect. Nuclear fission would have still been discovered experimentally, and could lead to the theroetical formulation of the mass-energy relationship (the famous E=mc^2) by another route. Maybe the significance of the speed of light (c) would be seen as no more than a curious anomaly.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old December 3rd, 2007, 11:45 PM
the_lyniezian the_lyniezian is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Wherever I happen to be
Posts: 1000 or more
In fact the c squared term would probably just be an apparently meaningless constant (like say Planck's constant) equivalent dimensionally to the square of speed, but it's significance would not be noticed without relativity theory (cue some bright spark deriving it by relativity later on!)
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old December 3rd, 2007, 11:56 PM
danielb1 danielb1 is offline
Yankee Capitalist Scum
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1000 or more
Lorentz and especially Poincare were already poking around Special Relativity. It would have been discovered, probably by Poincare, by no later than 1910 or so. In fact m = E/c^2 was proposed by Poincare in 1900...

General Relativity, OTOH, may have been delayed for decades. Even Einstein had some difficulty with it...
__________________
IAN seems to ban and kick people right, left, and center....
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old December 4th, 2007, 05:12 AM
Jasen777 Jasen777 is offline
Butterfly Fundamentalist
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1000 or more
Alot of bad AH has to find a different hero.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hominid
I have never been sigged.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.