|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Muslim Majority in Ottoman Europe
On a long and boring conference call, I calculated the proportion of the population of what was Ottoman Europe in 1876 is Muslim today.
I took all the territory of the empire and used Wikipedia to determine the populations and the % Muslim - when necessary, I delved into individual districts. The results - Name, total pop, % Muslim, ttl Muslim: Bulgaria 7,639,000 12.2% 931,958 Macedonia 2,038,514 33.3% 678,825 Bosnia 4,552,198 40.0% 1,820,879 Albania 3,600,523 60.0% 2,160,314 Greece 5,010,656 10.0% 502,693 Kossovo 2,200,000 90.0% 1,980,000 Serbia 865,984 7.8% 67,376 Serbia Sancak 235,567 60.4% 142,353 Mntgro Sancak 190,477 40.8% 77,715 Montenegro 229,459 13.7% 31,322 Romania 971,643 6.9% 67,500 Turkey 11,420,015 99.9% 11,408,595 Total 38,954,036 51.0% 19,869,530 If you leave out today's European Turkey, which is almost a third (!) of the population, you end up with 31% Muslim. By comparison, the Muslim % in 1877 is estimated to have been about 43%. If you consider the large number of Muslims that were evicted or killed between 1877-1922, that gives you an interesting idea of how the demographics might have gone. Given that Turkey's population today is almost four times that of the rest of what would have been Ottoman Balkan territory, it seems possible that given a rail network, demographic trends would have made the Balkans a heavily Muslim place over time. Food for thought. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have to say those figures are quite surprising. According to them between 1877 and 1990 Greece barely doubled in size going from five million to ten million people. That is extremely shocking. Now yes, they did kick out their muslim population but they got a larger number of Greeks(or at least Christians who called themselves Greeks) at the same time.
I belive the same is true of Bulgaria. I wonder why the population of the Balkans grew so slowly in comparison to the rest of Europe. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Turkey has been subjected to all that in much worse degrees than any of the others but has increased six-fold in the same period. I think the causes you've mentioned are a factor, but there's more to it than that.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
*GASP!* Wikipedia!
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
My post is probably a bit confusing, but that chart is the population today, within the borders of the Ottomans in 1877. The total growth has probably been somewhat higher than just doubling - although it's still way lower than the rest of Europe's. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
No, seriously, there are something like 1-3 million Greeks in the United States, and the largest single community is right in my neighborhood of NYC (perhaps as many as 200,000, although many have been moving out to the burbs). At least 350,000 Americans speak Greek at home. Easily that many Greeks live in Australia, mostly around Sydney. All told, there may be as many as 7 million "overseas" Greeks worldwide. Remember, too, that Greece is not the most fertile of countries, that the population is primarily urban, and that much of the best land is in the hands of the church. That counts against large families, but gives Greeks a strong impetus to emigrate.
__________________
Even damnation is poisoned with rainbows. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Same thing with the GTA, Léo. We also have Greeks in New England as well. Some people in MA might remember Christy Mihos recently running for Governor.
__________________
He who is easily converted isn't worth converting. Sargon's Theatre - the world's local cinema. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Just looking at the statistics, when we run into these scenarios like "what if Greece conquers Turkey next year" - I can't help but note that just the city of Istanbul alone has a larger population than Greece (11.2M) and Bulgaria (7.6M) combined(!). That's really staggering.
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think about 10 million, although I imagine the conurbation has more than that.
__________________
The leaves are falling back east; that's where I'm going to stay. |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Having said that, yeah, I should have remembered how many Greeks have emigrated. For the same reason, Ireland is IIRC the only European country to have dramatically lost population between the 19th and 20th Century, though obviously famines helped there. One thing, I'm aware that Greece is now quite urban; in fact half the country lives in Athens, but I thought that was a post-WWII developement. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Don't forget Michael Dukakis or Paul Tsongas. Yeah there are fairly signifigant Greek communities in SE Massachussetts. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Istanbul is organized as a conurbation - the geographical bounderies of its municipalities is larger than the populated area - it even covers a lot of forest. |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
My commute is about two hours, both ways, but that's fairly typical for people who live in NJ; it actually helps that I'm traveling against the flow, as I always have lots of room on the train. Grimm's commute is actually something like twice mine. It's largely a post-Lausanne thing, although Greece had some important urban centers (such as Salonica) even before Lausanne turned Athens into a sprawl.
__________________
Even damnation is poisoned with rainbows. |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wow. I could get a job in Detroit and take less time then that. (Well, maybe not Detroit Detroit. Something in the Metro area...)
|
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I must say I don't mind the idea of the Balkans practicing a Bosnian-style pragmatic, laid-back Islam rather than the vociferous Orthodox Christianity often seen in places like Serbia and even Greece. |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
It would require a stronger empire for this to happen - a long period of peace, along with development of a transporation network. I would posit that the greater prosperity and economic development of the Balkans, plus a labor shortage there, would encourage migration from poorer parts of the empire. The empire managed to stay out of wars from 1878-1911. If loss of Balkan territory could have been avoided in 1878, it's quite possible it could have been held permanently. Unlikely, but possible. The Treaty of Berlin was the final triumph of the national principle against the dynastic and universalist principles. It was also the first time the idea that the "small nations" should have their own states gained any currency, and gave a huge boost to ethnic nationalism. In 1876, the empire was dealing with a huge revolt in Bosnia and Herzogovina (which was not a nationalist revolt), while simultaneously dealing with a war with Serbia and Montenegro, and a constitutional revolution in Istanbul which saw two Sultans deposed in three months. There was never a better time for a Bulgarian National Revolt, and one was duly lauched. It had no takers, and fizzled out immediately. That's not to say nationalism wouldn't have developed, but nationalism requires fuel, and Bulgaria was immensely proseperous in this period. |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I think most moved away because the last time he went there (roughly 12 years ago) it was mostly Dominicans and Puerto Ricans.
__________________
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|