|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Texas, the U.S., and Mexico
1. Was Texas' entrance into the U.S. inevitable?
2. Could Texas have remained a part of Mexico successfully? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
2. Yes, without Santa Ana alot of things are possible. However, there is the problem that the new American settlers into Mexican Texas were bring slavery with them, and that would eventually have caused some tension between San Antonio and Mexico City. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well, the free vs. slave state debate aside, I'm wondering if the U.S. would rather have an area populated by Anglos inducted into the Union instead of an independent Anglo buffer state between itself and Mexico. And also I'm wondering if Texas always wanted to join the U.S., or if it would have developed its own sense of nationalism. But I doubt that it would be strong enough to outweigh the benefits of joining the Union (or the Confederacy).
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
The US was terribly expansionistic at the time, so it would have felt that the entire continent was destined to be part of the Republic. This is the period of Manifest Destiny after all. An independent Texas would have been viewed as enviously as Canada.
I believe that there was a small minority of Texians or Texicans (whatever they were called before they were Texans) that favored independence. The Texan President Mirabeau Lamar favored independence, but couldn't really get support. I actually think that an independent Texas wouldn't be Anglo, maybe Anglo dominated with a very strong and healthy Latino population. Texas itself only became 'white' after annexation. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Oh, and it was sparsly populated, militarily weak, and broke most of the time.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
As early as the 18teens, American Filibusters were active in Texas.
__________________
Washington And Jefferson Maed Menee A Joek. Van Buren Had Tue Pae, Taylor's Frieyeeng Pan Broek. Lincoln Just Gaat Hoem Graetlee Usttaanishd: |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|