|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Could America Have Gotten Involved in WW1 Early? | |||
| Yes |
|
13 | 38.24% |
| No |
|
4 | 11.76% |
| Maybe |
|
9 | 26.47% |
| I dunno. What's an america? |
|
1 | 2.94% |
| I blame Thande for WW1 and the United States Of America |
|
7 | 20.59% |
| Voters: 34. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Could America Have Gotten Involved in WW1 Early?
WELL? Could it?
__________________
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
No. Americans wanted no part in this war beyond a few East Coast elites. The German-Americans and others were firmly against U.S. entry into the war. The Irish did not want the U.S. to support the British. Most Americans realized early on that taking a trip across the Atlantic Ocean during this war would probably not be a good idea.
__________________
What if? |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Better question is on which side?
Supporting the British was not exactly a slam dunk, not in 1914.
__________________
Eddie would go! Rule # 32: Gotta enjoy the little things! |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
It makes a big difference when you start allowing POD's.
__________________
"They must abide by rules from which we're immune, because we're superior." |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
I've read a number of books that basically agree that if the USA had
entered the war earlier, the overall affect might have been a CP victory. What if the Germans had waged unrestricted submarine war in 1915 and the USA had declared war. The US army was too small to be a factor in the war and it's entirely possible Britain might have been starved out of the war before the US army was ready to deploy to Europe in significant numbers. It's an interesting thought but Wilson used the two years of interim time to build up the army so that the Millions of fresh troops that deployed in 1918 turned the tide so that the war could end in victory. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well, what if perhaps Theodore Roosevelt had won on his Progressive ticket. In my opinion, with him in charge, there would be a pretty good chance of the US entering the war earlier.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Or, perhaps under TR, the war would have been avoided.
__________________
What if? |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't think The USA could have gotten involved in WWI at the start in 1914, but I think The USA could have gotten in shortly after the sinking of The Lusitania in 1915. Since there were Americans killed in the sinking of The Lusitania, if those Americans who favored US intervention in WWI had pressed a little harder The USA might have gotten into the war then.
That would have put The USA into WWI nearly a year and a half earlier than in OTL. It would be interesting to know what effect that would have had on the war and on how long it would have lasted. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Under Wilson, an early entry in the war is unfeasible. Not even the sinking of Lusitania would change things: IMHO, the wily WW would not go to elections having just started an unpopular war. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|