Seljuk Kiev: What if the Turks were forced North?

What if the O'Ghuz Turks (principle ethnic group of Turkmenistan, Azerbaijan, and Turkey) were displaced from the Middle East? What if the Seljuks focused on Kiev instead? In this timeline, the land we now call Turkey, which the Greeks called Anatolia or Asia Minor, would remain in Byzantine possesion while what is called Russia (OTL) would be Turkish. The divergence of events takes place after the Turkomen converted to Islam. I originally posted this scenario on the othertimelines.com forum. Many questions to consider. How would the balance of power in the Middle East be different with the abscence of a major empire (the Sejulk and later Ottoman Turks)? How would the Byzantine Empire, Perisa, and the Arab Caliphate interact? Would the Khazar nation survive and if so, would Zionism still exist (that is would the Jews still migrate to Palestine)? How would a major Islamic power in Europe's backyard affect the West? What would be the affect on Genghis Khan centuries later? For ease of use, OTL events will be in boldface.

552 C.E.- Gokturk Empire, a confederation of nomadic Turkic tribes forms. This empire develops after the fallen Hsiungnu/Hun empire. By this time, the Roman Empire has fallen save for the Hellenic eastern portion based in Constantinople and Persia is under the Sassanid dynasty.

570-632 C.E.- Life of the prophet Muhammad.

7th Century C.E.- Khazar tribes confederate under Ashina clan.

670-950 C.E.- Khazars convert to Judaism, as by 830 it was the established state religion.

734-744 C.E.- Gokturk Empire declines

750 C.E.- By now, Islam has spread from Morroco and Iberia in the West to Afghanistan in the East. Muslim influence has been exerted over Persia for a century and the Zoroastrian Sassanid dynasty has long since fallen.

9th Century C.E.- Oghuz Turks migrate en masse from the steppes east of the Caspian Sea into the Iranian plataeu.

819 C.E.- Eastern Persia falls under Samanid rule.

882 C.E.- Following the reign of Rurik of Novgorod, the Khazar town of Kiev becomes a Varangian possession under Oleg.

913 C.E.- Western Persia falls under Buwayhid rule.

950 C.E.- Kynyk Seljuk, a former officer in the Khazar army of Oghuz descent, took the lead of the Oghuz diaspora, where they coalesced near the city of Jend (Khujand) and converted to Islam.

955 C.E.- Buwayhids conquer all of Persia as far East as the Hindu Kush (in modern Pakistan, OTL). Samanid dynasty is ousted from power.

961 C.E.- Buwayhid shahs sign peace treaty with Byzantines so as to concentrate on Turkish threat.

969 C.E.- The Persians force Oghuz armies out of Mesopotamia, Iran, and Afghanistan. Turks form exodus back into Khazaria.

972 C.E.- Bey Seljuk leads his army southward towards Caucasus. Byzantines mobilize army.

977 C.E.- Byzantine army, in its struggle against Turkish forces in Armenia, calls upon Persia for an alliance.

980 C.E.- Vladimir is crowned Prince of Kiev.

981 C.E.- Seljuk armies withdraw from Caucasus region.

985 C.E.- Bey Seljuk orders a seige of Kiev. Within weeks Kiev is sacked. The Seljuks execute Prince Vladimir and his supporters. Kynyk Seljuk declares himself Sultan of Kiev and makes Islam the state religion of the Seljuk Kingdom of Kiev.

989 C.E.- The Seljuk Army comes to the aid of the fledgling Khazar survivors, now stateless, and drive the Kievan Rus out of Khazaria. The cities of Sarkel, Tamatarkha, and Atil are given back to the Khazars as well as much of the former Khazar Empire on the Volga-Don and the lands between the Sea of Azov, the Caspian Sea south to the Caucasus mountains. Khazaria is named a satellite state of the Seljuk Empire. The Seljuks accept the Khazars who being Jewish, are tolerated by the Muslim Oghuz Turks as "People of the Book" but are required to pay a tribute to the Sultan of Kiev.

995 C.E.- By now, the Turks have conquered the enitre Crimean Penninsula and northern shore of the Black Sea as well as much of the Ukraine and southern European Russia (OTL). Any descendents of the Kievan Rus who have not been killed or assimilated fled northward and to the west, towards the Baltic Sea.

1005 C.E.- As Turkish forces dominate what would become OTL Russia, The remaining Oghuz populations emigrate from Armenia, Syria, Mesopotamia, Iran, and Afghanistan into the Kievan Seljuk Empire. The Turkish population soars due to immigration and prosperity.

1016 C.E.- Togrul, successor to Kynyk, takes the throne.

1017 C.E.- Under Togrul, Khazaria, now a weak state under a Khazar puppet king of the Seljuks, is fully annexed as part of the Seljuk Empire and the Khazars recieved all the rights and benefits of citizens of the Empire.

1024 C.E.- Togrul wages a campaign to seize Novgorod. The war lasts for nine years until finally, the Varangians, exhausted, lose the city to the Turks.

1038 C.E.- By now, the Turkish Empire has doubled in size, reaching as far east as the Urals, as far west as a small strip of land on the Baltic Sea, and as far north as Ladoga. To the Southeast lie allied Turkic kingdoms, and the rival Persian Empire. By now, the Bulgars, being ethnically and culturally Turkicized largely due to the custom of intermarriage between Bulgars and Oghuz, have been all but completely assimilated. Many of the Viking and Finnic-Magyar peoples in the northern provinces have converted to Islam.

1044 C.E.- A Turkish conquest was attempted along the Baltic Coast (OTL Latvia, Lithuania, and Poland) but was repelled by Teutonic armies.

1050 C.E.- A more successful campaign was launched further south, capturing territory belonging to OTL Hungary, Romania, and Bulgaria.

1056 C.E.- The Turkish advance is stopped by Byzantine forces south of the Danube River.

1058 C.E.- Togrul's nephew Suleiman, provincial ruler of Novgorod builds up a janissary army consisting of Norse warriors.

1060 C.E.- Togrul leaves the throne to Alp Arsalan.

1061 C.E.- Suleiman, angry at not recieving the throne in Kiev declared himself Sultan of Novgorod and demands to secede from Kiev. Alp Arsalan, now the ruler in Kiev challenges Suleiman. The two lead rival janissary armies into battle.

1064 C.E.- Alp Arsalan wins the Turkish civil war, but not being a sore winner, strikes a deal with Suleiman, who is promoted to top military advisor of the Sultan. Alp Arsalan considers moving the capital northward, to a more central location in the growing nation of Seljuq Turkiye (no longer Seljuk Kiev, Oghuz Kiev, or Turkish Kiev).

Mid 11th Century C.E.- Fearing Turkish aggression in Eastern Europe, the Byzantine Empire forged alliances with the Franco-Teutonic Kingdoms.

Feel free to modify or add to my Timeline! For instance, I am open to suggestions for improvement, such as how to make the timeline more historically accurate or otherwise more plausible. Feel free to point out errors. How would a "Turkish Russia" (as opposed to a Slavic one) affect the course of history? How would the Black Plague affect Turkish Russia? Would the Crusades ever happen? How long would the Byzantine Empire last? Would Ellas be a Mediterranean power or perhaps a European power? Would they be a world power? How would Genghis Khan's exploits turn out? How would a Muslim Empire affect European civilization? It would certainly be interesting to see how famous historical figures such as Charlemaigne, Barbarossa, Saladin, and Genghis Khan would interact.

My predictions:
* The Byzantine Empire would presumably last somewhat longer. (In actual history it lasted into the thirteenth century!) Would it last until the 19th century? Doubtful. Eventually the territory would be reduced to various ethnic republic (the Republic of Ellas for instance), with Cyprus and the Hellenic-dominated lands of Anatolia included, thus significantly larger than OTL modern Greece, though the capital probably would be moved from Byzantium/Constantinople, (never Istanbul) to Athena.
* Armenia would be much larger, consisting of much of the Caucasus region and eastern regions of penninsular Asia Minor. The Kurds presumably would also have a significant state.
* The Islamic faith would be even more prominent, encompassing Eastern Europe, Central Asia, Siberia, and possibly Mongolia. For instance, even after the dissolution of the Empire of the Great Khan, the Mongolians would convert to Islam in large numbers. How far Islam spreads in Europe would depend on how aggressively the Turks evangelize.
* Jewish peoples would still be scattered throughout Europe, but not as many in the Christian parts of Eastern Europe (Poland, Chechoslovakia, Yugoslavia, the Baltic States, etc.) as in OTL, as many Jews fled czarist oppression in Russia-Ukraine. There may in fact be a greater culture gap between Western and Eastern Ashkenazim (differences between Germanic and Slavic Jews in OTL). Would Zionism ever attain significance in this timeline?
* The schisms associated with the Protestant Reformation might never occur. Perhaps the East-West split spawning Roman Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy would be mended with the two churches reconciled into one. Should a successful Protestant Reformation occur, the divisiveness would only help the expansion of Islam.
* In lieu of the Crusades, similar battles would occur as Byzantines, Saracens, Persians, and French compete for control of Palestine and Lebanon. It is not as likely to be a simple two-sided Christians v. Muslims affair as many European powers would probably challenge eachother.
* Ellas would at the very least, be a great Mediterranean power, competing with Italy, France, and Spain over the Mediterranean and with Persia over the Middle East or Silk Road. Whether Hellenic colonies are established on distant continents competing with British and French ones is another question. Of course the butterflies emerging from this timeline (an enormous change centuries ago) might have all sorts of unforseen effects on Western Europe and the balance of power. For instance, consider the effects on the Viking and Holy Roman Empires and their subsequent impacts on French and British history.
* Turkish caviar would still be Turkish caviar (the Turks would still dominate a shore of the Black Sea) and Turkish baths would still be Turkish baths, though people would STILL confuse them with Finnish baths (saunas). Loukoumia, however, would be known by their Hellenic name rather than "Turkish delights". Likewise, many foods associated with the Eastern Mediterranean will be associated with their Iranian, Hellenic, and Arab producers. I.e. shish kebab would be known as souvlaki or al-kebab. The Turks would have to invent their own cuisine, but then the Hellenes might be without youghurt and therefore dzadziki.
* Much as OTL Constantinople was renamed "Istanbul" a Turkish rendering of the Greek for "In the city" Novgorod, Kiev, or perhaps the future site of Moscow might be a Turkish rendering of the same phrase in Russian, example: "Vugarad"

So discuss my timeline and anticipations, predictions! In the meantime, I plan on extending it and even creating a map.
 
I like it, i think it has real potential.
The crusades in some form would still happen i reckon, to many younger sons etc etc wanting to go and gain some land
 
Well, beyond a certain point their European opponents aren't going to be as dysfunctional as the Byzantines are. The Teutonic Knights, Poland, and Lithuania are probably more formidable rivals in Eastern Europe. I could see Lithuania getting knocked over, but Poland and the Knights are a rather tougher nut to crack.

At which point, Poland becomes the "Bulwark of Europe" as in OTL, just in a different direction. And with no Russian rival as the predominant Slavic state in the north, you must see some interesting butterflies that way. Really depends on how functional the Turkish state is more than anything else. If it hits a period of decline, you could see something similar to OTL, where Austria and Poland reconquered Hungary and so forth.

As for the Byzantines...why would they neccesarily fall apart? Their economic and political heartland are intact. I can see increasing amounts of corruption, but unless someone comes along and kicks the legs out from under them, there's no reason they can't limp on for a very, very long time. Hell, having a rival far enough away that invasion isn't immediate, but close enough to be a problem-on the other side of the Black Sea-might actually benefit them a bit.
 
Here's a rough approximation of the situation....

theory.PNG
 

Keenir

Banned
What if the O'Ghuz Turks (principle ethnic group of Turkmenistan, Azerbaijan, and Turkey) were displaced from the Middle East? What if the Seljuks focused on Kiev instead?

interesting question.

and welcome to the forum.

(that is would the Jews still migrate to Palestine)?

the Khazars themselves tried such a move in OTL.

How would a major Islamic power in Europe's backyard affect the West?

um, check OTL. :)

1005 C.E.- As Turkish forces dominate what would become OTL Russia, The remaining Oghuz populations emigrate from Armenia, Syria, Mesopotamia, Iran, and Afghanistan into the Kievan Seljuk Empire. The Turkish population soars due to immigration and prosperity.

why do all the Turks want to live in Russia?

1038 C.E.- By now, the Turkish Empire has doubled in size, reaching as far east as the Urals, as far west as a small strip of land on the Baltic Sea, and as far north as Ladoga. To the Southeast lie allied Turkic kingdoms, and the rival Persian Empire. By now, the Bulgars, being ethnically and culturally Turkicized largely due to the custom of intermarriage between Bulgars and Oghuz, have been all but completely assimilated. Many of the Viking and Finnic-Magyar peoples in the northern provinces have converted to Islam.

ah, a pan-Turanist timeline. :)

1058 C.E.- Togrul's nephew Suleiman, provincial ruler of Novgorod builds up a janissary army consisting of Norse warriors.

did the Seljuks have the concept of janissaries? thought that that was an Ottoman innovation.

Mid 11th Century C.E.- Fearing Turkish aggression in Eastern Europe, the Byzantine Empire forged alliances with the Franco-Teutonic Kingdoms.

um, why does the Byzantine Emperor care about the Turks threatening the Teutonic folks?

In the meantime, I plan on extending it and even creating a map.

please do!
 
Now that I see the map, this Timeline would have some interesting changes for the Teutonic knights! A christian crusader state next to muslim russia!

Given OTL and history of islamic countries, I'd still see the Turkish empire in decline sooner or later and eurpean powers in expansion. ITTL, there might be even more expansion into muslim countries than OTL, hence Habsburgs, Poland, Teutonic Knights and Sweden might be more expansionistic into the east.
 
Here's a rough approximation of the situation....

By the looks of things, you have the Byzantines possessing Syria and Palestine when they were held by the Fatimids. The Byzantines never regained control of these areas in OTL. I probably missed something, but what happened here?
 
(...)

Feel free to modify or add to my Timeline! For instance, I am open to suggestions for improvement, such as how to make the timeline more historically accurate or otherwise more plausible. Feel free to point out errors. How would a "Turkish Russia" (as opposed to a Slavic one) affect the course of history? How would the Black Plague affect Turkish Russia? Would the Crusades ever happen? How long would the Byzantine Empire last? Would Ellas be a Mediterranean power or perhaps a European power? Would they be a world power? How would Genghis Khan's exploits turn out? How would a Muslim Empire affect European civilization? It would certainly be interesting to see how famous historical figures such as Charlemaigne, Barbarossa, Saladin, and Genghis Khan would interact.

Well, one thing is that I don't see the Buwayhids defeating the Samanids all by themselves and still managing to keep out the Seljuks, allthough this doesn't need to be a problem in your scenario, as the Samanids weren't that fond of Turkish invaders either, so you could just let them ally with the Buwayhids againest the Turks. (...although it should be noted that the Samanid state and power were desintegrating at this point [in the 960's] due to developments that would lead to the rise of the Ghaznawids).

Then there's also a small detail (though its not very important for this TL); though the Sassanid Empire had indeed been conquered by the Muslim Arabs for a century in the year 750 AD, the Muslim invaders had failed to conquer the area known as Tabarestan (roughly the Iranian part of the Caspian coast), and this area was ruled by independant Zoroastrian nobles until well into the 9th century.

And then just a few questions: Exactly how are these Seljuks dealing with the Volga Bulgarians?

In OTL, the Volga Bulgarians rose to power after the Kievan Rus had crushed their Khazar enemies, and Volga Bulgaria was quite a powerful nation between the late 10th and 13th centuries.

And any Seljuk attempt to invade and colonize this area will undoubtly lead to a confrontation with the Volga Bulgarians sooner or later...

...and another thing about the Volga Bulgarians; in spite of the fact that their empire was quite strong, they never managed to defeat and conquer the Kievan Rus. In fact, the Russians were gradually forcing them to the east until the Mongols came and finished them off.

And if the Volga Bulgarians couldn't manage to defeat and conquer the Russians, how likely is it that the Seljuks, who weren't that much stronger than the Volga Bulgarians during the late 10th century...

And another problem for the Seljuks; how are they going to deal with the pagan Cumans, who will be invading the same region in the early 11th century?

The Cumans sure gave the Russians quite some trouble, and their invasion could very well put an end to the Seljuk advance into Europe, and quite possibly even to the Seljuk empire itself...

And there's another thing that I'd just like to know: do the Turks who were exiled from Persia (the Oghuz Turkish exodus that you described) find their way into Khazaria by travelling over the Caucasus, or do they first migrate to Central Asia, and then turn westwards to Khazaria?

My predictions:
* The Byzantine Empire would presumably last somewhat longer. (In actual history it lasted into the thirteenth century!) Would it last until the 19th century? Doubtful. Eventually the territory would be reduced to various ethnic republic (the Republic of Ellas for instance), with Cyprus and the Hellenic-dominated lands of Anatolia included, thus significantly larger than OTL modern Greece, though the capital probably would be moved from Byzantium/Constantinople, (never Istanbul) to Athena.

Wait till Midgard sees this....

* Armenia would be much larger, consisting of much of the Caucasus region and eastern regions of penninsular Asia Minor. The Kurds presumably would also have a significant state.
* The Islamic faith would be even more prominent, encompassing Eastern Europe, Central Asia, Siberia, and possibly Mongolia. For instance, even after the dissolution of the Empire of the Great Khan, the Mongolians would convert to Islam in large numbers. How far Islam spreads in Europe would depend on how aggressively the Turks evangelize.
* Jewish peoples would still be scattered throughout Europe, but not as many in the Christian parts of Eastern Europe (Poland, Chechoslovakia, Yugoslavia, the Baltic States, etc.) as in OTL, as many Jews fled czarist oppression in Russia-Ukraine. There may in fact be a greater culture gap between Western and Eastern Ashkenazim (differences between Germanic and Slavic Jews in OTL). Would Zionism ever attain significance in this timeline?
* The schisms associated with the Protestant Reformation might never occur. Perhaps the East-West split spawning Roman Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy would be mended with the two churches reconciled into one. Should a successful Protestant Reformation occur, the divisiveness would only help the expansion of Islam.
* In lieu of the Crusades, similar battles would occur as Byzantines, Saracens, Persians, and French compete for control of Palestine and Lebanon. It is not as likely to be a simple two-sided Christians v. Muslims affair as many European powers would probably challenge eachother.
* Ellas would at the very least, be a great Mediterranean power, competing with Italy, France, and Spain over the Mediterranean and with Persia over the Middle East or Silk Road. Whether Hellenic colonies are established on distant continents competing with British and French ones is another question. Of course the butterflies emerging from this timeline (an enormous change centuries ago) might have all sorts of unforseen effects on Western Europe and the balance of power. For instance, consider the effects on the Viking and Holy Roman Empires and their subsequent impacts on French and British history.
* Turkish caviar would still be Turkish caviar (the Turks would still dominate a shore of the Black Sea) and Turkish baths would still be Turkish baths, though people would STILL confuse them with Finnish baths (saunas). Loukoumia, however, would be known by their Hellenic name rather than "Turkish delights". Likewise, many foods associated with the Eastern Mediterranean will be associated with their Iranian, Hellenic, and Arab producers. I.e. shish kebab would be known as souvlaki or al-kebab. The Turks would have to invent their own cuisine, but then the Hellenes might be without youghurt and therefore dzadziki.
* Much as OTL Constantinople was renamed "Istanbul" a Turkish rendering of the Greek for "In the city" Novgorod, Kiev, or perhaps the future site of Moscow might be a Turkish rendering of the same phrase in Russian, example: "Vugarad"

So discuss my timeline and anticipations, predictions! In the meantime, I plan on extending it and even creating a map.

Well, a few of my predictions in this scenario would be that the Crusades will most propably be butterflied away alltogether in this scenario, regarding the fact that the response to the Turkish occupation of Anatolia was one of the most important developments that eventually led to the First Crusader.

The Great Schism between the Roman Catholics and Greek Orthodox is still bound to happen, as there had been differences, conflicts and even a few short-lived schisms between the Greek and Roman Catholics for at least 500 years at that point.

As for the Kurds getting a single state, well that's just not very likely IMHO, as the Kurds were deeply divided, and not just politically, but the Kurds also practiced many different religions, and IIRC the Kurds weren't fully Islamized until the 15th or 16th century or so.

And with a lot of Byzantine and Armenian influence in Anatolia and the Middle East, it is quite likely that there will be significant numbers of Christian Kurds as well.

I'd say that most Kurds will just remain a minority in non-Kurdish states and empires, with the exception of a few small Kurdish fiefdoms.

Oh, and one more detail: in this TL, Saladin would almost certainly be butterflied away.
 
By the looks of things, you have the Byzantines possessing Syria and Palestine when they were held by the Fatimids. The Byzantines never regained control of these areas in OTL. I probably missed something, but what happened here?

Ace

Actually during the 10th century revival of Byzantium power they did get back a lot of Syria down to the borders of modern Israel if I remember rightly. Not sure how far inland, for instance if they too Damascus. This territory they held until just before the 1st crusade, i.e. some time after the defeat at Manizert.

Steve
 
By the looks of things, you have the Byzantines possessing Syria and Palestine when they were held by the Fatimids. The Byzantines never regained control of these areas in OTL. I probably missed something, but what happened here?

Waitasec, didn't John Tzimisces conquer Damascus and other parts of Syria in 975?

He failed to take Palestine, but he certainly did conquer most of Syria...
 

Keenir

Banned
Well, a few of my predictions in this scenario would be that the Crusades will most propably be butterflied away alltogether in this scenario, regarding the fact that the response to the Turkish occupation of Anatolia was one of the most important developments that eventually led to the First Crusader.

maybe the Byzantines will ask for help from the west ("on time" or a bit later) in fighting off a Kurdish army rather than a Turkish one.

(or a Kurdish&Armenian alliance breathing down the neck of Byzantium)
 
The Teutonic knights came much later into existence, and only went to Prussia in 13th century.

The hardest thing to believe is: Why did they cross the Caucasus? It'd be easier for them if they came from Central Asia (which would have to be earlier, of course).

Sorry for criticizing, it's a very original TL!
 
The hardest thing to believe is: Why did they cross the Caucasus? It'd be easier for them if they came from Central Asia (which would have to be earlier, of course).

That's also what I've been wondering - at that time, the Caucasus was still dominated by hostile Christian kingdoms and principalities (the Armenian kingdoms and principalities, the Georgian principalities, the Christian Avar kingdom of Sarir, the Alan kingdom) and pagan tribes, and add to that that any exiled Turks (the Turkish exodus in 969 ITTL) would be more likely to go to Central Asia, especially those from Iran and Afghanistan.

IMHO, to have the Muslim Turks from the Middle East in the 10th century migrate into Khazaria through the Caucasus is just implausible...
 
Thanks for the Feedback!

Originally Posted by Slacker
Well, beyond a certain point their European opponents aren't going to be as dysfunctional as the Byzantines are. The Teutonic Knights, Poland, and Lithuania are probably more formidable rivals in Eastern Europe. I could see Lithuania getting knocked over, but Poland and the Knights are a rather tougher nut to crack.

At which point, Poland becomes the "Bulwark of Europe" as in OTL, just in a different direction. And with no Russian rival as the predominant Slavic state in the north, you must see some interesting butterflies that way. Really depends on how functional the Turkish state is more than anything else. If it hits a period of decline, you could see something similar to OTL, where Austria and Poland reconquered Hungary and so forth.

I admit that my knowledge of early medieval Eastern/Central Europe is not as strong.

Originally Posted by Keenir
why do all the Turks want to live in Russia?
Except for the Turks who remained in Turinistan (Turkistan- modern Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, non-Iranian regions of Afghanistan and Tajikstan, adjacent regions of China, Mongolia, and Siberia, etc. The Oghuz who followed the Seljuk clan (i.e. like a nomadic army such as other Altaic or Turko-Mongol peoples such as the Huns, or the Mongols, or the Manchus) ended up scattered in Persian territory. If the army was defeated, they would be tempted to leave. The Turkish migrants would not be welcome and would face persecution and upon hearing of successful conquests up North, would therefore move. After all when your unwilling host kills off the remnant population, would not survivors flee to a more promising land?

Originally Posted by Keenir
did the Seljuks have the concept of janissaries? thought that that was an Ottoman innovation.
Then perhaps I should fix that. Either way, it seems likely that the Seljuks would employ some sort of mercenaries whom they might even declare honorary Turks, a foreshadowing of the jannisary. It seems sooner or later the "Kievan Turks" might change dynasties. I do not know if I should refer to this dynasty as "Ottoman" however, because given butterflies and what not, what is the chance that the same dynasty as OTL would take over...

Originally Posted by Keenir
um, why does the Byzantine Emperor care about the Turks threatening the Teutonic folks?
Perhaps the threat of Turkish expansion into the Balkans (this time from the Northeast rather than the East). For instance Turkish invasion into Bulgaria. Meanwhile the Turks are encroaching onto Central European territory. As such a pact or alliance could be mutually beneficial.

Originally Posted by Keenir
please do!
I plan on it, but then it seems G. Bone beat me to the chase. By the way, he did a great job and for that I thank him. Very detailed! Of course, the map somewhat differs from my idea, so I might make one anyways...

Originally Posted by Ran Exilis
Well, one thing is that I don't see the Buwayhids defeating the Samanids all by themselves and still managing to keep out the Seljuks, allthough this doesn't need to be a problem in your scenario, as the Samanids weren't that fond of Turkish invaders either, so you could just let them ally with the Buwayhids againest the Turks.
I guess than I should probably change this in a later edition of my timeline. I had the impression that the Samanids were on friendly terms with Turkoman tribes (and not so friendly terms with the Buwayhids) and inadvertedly allowed the Turks to gain the upper hand. I guess my source was not that reliable! This is critical, because it is essentially my POD (that the Persians defeat the Turkish armed forces and route them, thus thwarting their settlement), but I could rewrite it to have the two Persian dynasties ally against the Turkish threat for a better, more plausible and historically accurate TL.

Originally Posted by Ran Exilis
And then just a few questions: Exactly how are these Seljuks dealing with the Volga Bulgarians?
I did not delve into enough depth or detail, and that hinders my timeline, but it is possible that the Seljuks might get along better with the Bulgars than the Rus did. (The Volga Bulgars were a Turkic people. The modern Bulgarians are Slavicized Turks (that is they are the descendents of Central Asian Turks who mixed with Slavic peoples and adopted a Yugoslavian language. In fact, genetically I think Bulgarians are even more Turkic than the people of Turkey, having more Central Asian admixture than any other European nation according to some studies.) therefore, given their common origins, the Turks are more likely to get along with the Bulgars, but they might still fight, ethnic conflict would not be much of an issue.

Originally Posted by Ran Exilis
...and another thing about the Volga Bulgarians; in spite of the fact that their empire was quite strong, they never managed to defeat and conquer the Kievan Rus. In fact, the Russians were gradually forcing them to the east until the Mongols came and finished them off.

And if the Volga Bulgarians couldn't manage to defeat and conquer the Russians, how likely is it that the Seljuks, who weren't that much stronger than the Volga Bulgarians during the late 10th century...
Except for the fact that in this TL, the Seljuk Turkomen did not outright conquer the Khazars (remember that in OTL the Seljuks were on friendly terms), and therefore the Khazar Empire remained for a while. Maybe I should revise my timeline to have the Khazars hold out a little more and not have the Turks so willing to grant a protectorate or annex them. Then the two powers would together stand against the Bulgars, Cumans, and perhaps eventually, the Mongolians. Consider that the Bulgars may have risen to power partly due to the power vacuum in the wake of the decline of Khazaria. Consider also that the Rus were not quite as nomadic as the Turks of the time. Perhaps the Seljuks would be more adapt at combating a nomadic militarist culture. Not to mention the Oghuz ancestors/forrunners of today's Turks and Azeris brought down the mighty Byzantine Empire.

Originally Posted by Ran Exilis
And another problem for the Seljuks; how are they going to deal with the pagan Cumans, who will be invading the same region in the early 11th century?

The Cumans sure gave the Russians quite some trouble, and their invasion could very well put an end to the Seljuk advance into Europe, and quite possibly even to the Seljuk empire itself...
You underestimate the capabilities of this geographically Russian Turkish nation. Considering that the Turks would have a different cultural background than the Kievan Rus, your assumptions need not appply. On the one hand, the Cumans certainly could halt the Seljuk Empire, even overrun it. It depends how well the Seljuks manage their forces.

Originally Posted by Ran Exilis
And there's another thing that I'd just like to know: do the Turks who were exiled from Persia (the Oghuz Turkish exodus that you described) find their way into Khazaria by travelling over the Caucasus, or do they first migrate to Central Asia, and then turn westwards to Khazaria?
Basically those remnant Turkish refugees scattered throughout Eastern Syria, Mesopotamia, trans-Caucasus (OTL Azerjiaban and Armenia), and western Iran would migrate northward in a straight path over the Caucasus (west of the Caspian Sea), while those concentrated in Iran, Afghanistan, and Persian-dominated parts of Central Asia would migrate from east of the Caspian Sea, through Central Asia.

In the meantime, I plan on continuing this timeline. Prepare a couple cameo appearances!
 
Actually during the 10th century revival of Byzantium power they did get back a lot of Syria down to the borders of modern Israel if I remember rightly. Not sure how far inland, for instance if they too Damascus.

From what I remember, they did regain some ground but were not near the Damascus before Manzikert. They were holding onto Antioch. Midgard would probably be able to clarify this little matter.
 
Another very good question is how this Turkish Russian state is going to deal with the Mongol/Mongol analogue horde down the road...
 
800px-Map_Byzantine_Empire_1025-fr.svg.png


This is Byzantium in 1025. I don't know if the Empire lost many territories right after the death of Basil II - but if they did, it was probably to the Seljuks, who aren't a thread in TTL.
 
Top