Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Discussion: After 1900

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 26th, 2007, 12:38 PM
Melvin Loh Melvin Loh is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Darwin, NT, Australia
Posts: 1000 or more
Narvik salient by June 1940

Just influenced by watchin a HIST CHANNEL documentary tonight on the Norwegian resistance during WWII- WI the Allies, perhaps with a much greater degree of preparation and with a better conducted campaign in France, had been able to hold onto Narvik after the British forces and French mtn exp force had subdued Gen Eduard Dietl's German garrison there ? Could Narvik and northern Norway have then remained viably in British hands, and with what wider effects ?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old January 26th, 2007, 02:39 PM
Magnum Magnum is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Romania
Posts: 826
with a better conducted defense of France, of course. Otherwise, probably not. It's strange how the germans at Narvik managed to resist, despide all odds, and even mount a succesfull counter-attack
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old January 26th, 2007, 03:00 PM
esl esl is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 524
I don't know if Battlegroup Dietl was ever realy subdued. They were pushed out of Narvik but as pointed out they did mount a counter attack. German infantry were famous for being able to hold on to 'seemingly impossible' situations.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.