|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
In 1800, the American inventor Robert Fulton built a 6.4-m (21-ft) submarine named the Nautilus, which was similar in shape to the modern submarine. Fulton introduced two important innovations: rudders for vertical and horizontal control and compressed air as an underwater supply of oxygen. When submerged, the Nautilus was powered by a hand-operated, four-blade propeller. On the surface the boat was propelled by means of sails attached to a folding mast.
Demonstrated in Rouen with Fulton aboard, the Nautilus folded its mast and sails flat on the deck and, with three crew members cranking a screw, dove to a depth of 7.6 m (25 ft). The French and later the British, however, showed no interest. What if, however, the United States had heard about the Nautilus and began to pursue the technology? What I am interested in is not how this could happen, but how far submarine technology could be taken in 19th century America.
__________________
Thoughts? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well, the only real source of power besides the sails you mentioned, would be either steam power, or human locomotion, as in the Hunley. Steam wouldn't really work for a fully submersible vehicle, because of the byproducts of combustion. On the other hand, the possibility of a semi-submersible vehicle, which submerges to just below the surface of the water, and uses a ram or torpedo to destroy an enemy ship might work. You'd have to wait until 1870 at the extreme earliest to get a fully submersible vehicle, and even then, self-propelled torpedoes are still almost two decades off.
__________________
Drew Curtis' Fark.com The only winner in the War of 1812 was Tchaikovsky. -Solomon Short |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
without torpedoes subs would be used as say a ram to break ships
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|