So what happens to the world from the late 18th century onwards if Britain uses South Africa as a place to dump convicts on the same scale as Australia? Does this impact sout african politics or do we still see the afrikaners holding on strong nearly to the end of the 20th century?
Considering the Australian transportees constitiuted 100% of all transportees, to have SA used on the same level demands a doubling in the crime figures, or a reduction in transportation to Oz by 50%
Seriously, there's no need for a second set of convict colonies
I was thinking of Britain deciding to be more repressive on crime and thus have the amount of transportees to send to SA.
When the Law gives you transportation for stealing a loaf of Bread, it is hard to get more Repressive.I was thinking of Britain deciding to be more repressive on crime and thus have the amount of transportees to send to SA.
I'm not sure this would be wise.
Australia was a big 'empty' continent. Nowhere for them to run to.
In South Africa the boers aren't that far away...
When the Law gives you transportation for stealing a loaf of Bread, it is hard to get more Repressive.
So what happens to the world from the late 18th century onwards if Britain uses South Africa as a place to dump convicts on the same scale as Australia? Does this impact sout african politics or do we still see the afrikaners holding on strong nearly to the end of the 20th century?