|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Trent Affair: British Commanders
I was wondering if anyone could help assigning commanders to the British-Canadian Army for a Trent Counterfactual. (A real one, not like Conroy's 1862, where he put 2 Field Marshals as Division Commanders under a passed over Maj Gen)
Using Wolsley's reorganisation, the Canadian Militia had 9 Divisions (and a separate brigade, that of Prince Edward Island), 4 in Ontario, 3 in Quebec and 1 each from the two Maritimes (which were 50% larger than the others). However, while they had staff, they had no Division Commanders. Now, the British in Jan 62 were organised as a large (in fact double sized) Division under William Fenwick Williams (Maj Gen, acting Lt Gen). At home, the British were organised into 7 Divisions (at Dublin, Curragh, Portsmouth, Dover/ Shorncliffe, Aldershot, Colchester and the Guards Div at London). The reinforcements of Jan 62 were 2 Brigades from the Division at Colchester, and a Brigade from the Guards. The British also had 6 other formations rated as Divisions outside of India (at South Africa, Gibraltar, Malta, the Ionian Islands and New Zealand, plus a Division in China), plus some scattered brigades and regiments. Thus I'm guessing on the following for Division command:
Any ideas? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm working on a Trent counterfactual that no one seems interested in called The Northwest Campaign, detailing the operations of a Union army under Pope and Grenville Dodge that crosses into Canada and hits Fort William to divert Canadian/British resources from Niagara.
I've come across the disturbing fact that most Canadian and British troop movements in Canada weren't really that well documented. What is your main emphasis? Are you writing this like a campaign history, or a story? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|