The challenge is with a POD of 1914 to make the Men's Rights movement is more successful and popular than in OTL.
You do mean the kind that lobbies for rape laws to be rewritten to be gender-neutral and custody outcomes to be fairer as opposed to the kind which moonlights on pick-up artistry fora and redpill, right?
A key step would be in being able to clearly divide these poles of the "movement", which is currently more of a self-identified label, at least as far as the media is concerned.Yes, I do.
Yes, I do.
The challenge is with a POD of 1914 to make the Men's Rights movement is more successful and popular than in OTL.
You do mean the kind that lobbies for rape laws to be rewritten to be gender-neutral and custody outcomes to be fairer as opposed to the kind which moonlights on pick-up artistry fora and redpill, right?
Well then I suggest a stronger and broader feminist movement would do the trick.
Both of these issues seem to have more to do with gender equality rather than 'men's rights'. I mean both of these problems would be better served by a stronger feminist movement than a 'men's rights' may movement because if you want rape laws to be gender neutral you would first have to acknowledge that women are just as capable of raping a man. Many consider this impossible because they believe women to be 'weaker' than men and wouldn't be able to overpower him. While in the case of fairer custody decisions this can construed as a bias towards women as the primary carers of children because they are better 'suited' to care for children.
I consider both issues to problems for both genders and don't think these issues could be solved by a men's rights movement.
That's feminism, mate.
Ah ha ha, nope, not getting into this one.