Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Discussion: After 1900

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 22nd, 2006, 01:53 AM
WilyBadger WilyBadger is offline
Proud Phoenician!
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 423
Nuke DC! What next?

So something, somehow, goes horribly wrong and Washington, DC, is blasted off the map. After all the dust settles, both litterally and figuratively, what's the next US capital?

My guess'd be Phillidelphia. It's where our country got it's start. What's everyone else's opinions?
__________________
Badgeriffic!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old May 22nd, 2006, 02:00 AM
luakel luakel is offline
All You Need Is Cash
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Queen City of the West
Posts: 1000 or more
Send a message via AIM to luakel
If it's after 9/11, I'd say NYC.
__________________
Bessie Braddock: Sir, you are drunk.
Winston Churchill: And you, madam, are ugly. But in the morning, I shall be sober.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old May 22nd, 2006, 02:09 AM
Max Sinister Max Sinister is offline
Retired Myriad Club Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Chaos TL
Posts: 1000 or more
Finding places for all the government stuff must be an organizational nightmare. Why don't they repeat Washnington, Brasilia and Canberra again and create a completely new capital? Jules Verne once suggested a Centropolis as capital for the US, in Kansas or so.
__________________
Finished: Chaos TL - Genghis Khan dies in 1200
Timeline, Scenario, Stories!
Hitler's Med Strategy
Jaredia: A tilted Earth (NOW: 4000 BCE)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old May 22nd, 2006, 02:12 AM
EvolvedSaurian EvolvedSaurian is offline
Hairy Heathen
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Where Sullivan marched
Posts: 1000 or more
Send a message via AIM to EvolvedSaurian
NYC, LA or someplace in Texas.

ES
__________________
Liberté, égalité, fraternité
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old May 22nd, 2006, 04:14 AM
Darkest Darkest is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1000 or more
What could do that?

Some terrorists steal plutonium from a nuclear laboratory in a high-class heist. They get a rogue 'brilliant' scientist within the USA, that has all home equipment to build a Hiroshima grade nuke.

Would a Hiroshima nuke do it?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old May 22nd, 2006, 04:21 AM
Wendell Wendell is offline
Panned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lost in what might have been
Posts: 1000 or more
Parkersburg, West Virginia, or the Greenbrier in White Sulphur Springs, also in West Virginia.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old May 22nd, 2006, 01:29 PM
Umbral Umbral is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1000 or more
I think it depends on what caused the explosion. The overwhelming priority will be to avoid that happening again.

I.e. if it was a hostile act, defensiveness will be a priority, etc.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old May 22nd, 2006, 03:00 PM
Tom Veil Tom Veil is offline
Nowhere Man
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 1000 or more
Well, without knowing why DC 'sploded, I'll say Arlington, VA. There are more government offices there than anywhere outside of DC.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whanztastic View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Red View Post
I kidnap baby Hitler and leave him at a care home in the present day.
That is the nicest removal of Hitler that I have ever seen.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old May 22nd, 2006, 03:36 PM
Thande Thande is online now
Proletarian Adventurer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: University of Sheffield
Posts: 1000 or more
Which begs the question: does the US have plans for the order of priority for alternative seats of government? (Answer is probably, but they're classified). In the UK for example, if London is destroyed, government rule is automatically transferred to Edinburgh (if it's a one-off disaster/strike), or the TURNSTILE bunker complex near the Cotswolds (if it's a full blown MAD).
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old May 22nd, 2006, 07:53 PM
CalBear CalBear is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In a house on Sol-3
Posts: 1000 or more
I would expect that the whole Virginia/Maryland area would be a bit discombobulated if D.C. got nuked. My vote is for the Denver area. Central location, lots of Regional Federal offices in place, close to NORAD (just in case the nukes fall again).

BTW: Shouldn't we worry about who blew the Capitol up before we decide where to put the next bullseye?
__________________
Eddie would go!


Rule # 32: Gotta enjoy the little things!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old May 22nd, 2006, 09:26 PM
Dave Howery Dave Howery is offline
laughs at your pain
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Cheyenne WY
Posts: 1000 or more
wouldn't the US want to do the same thing as with DC? Carve out a piece of territory somewhere to be a separate federal entity, free of obligation to any state? They could do this about anywhere they want, but I imagine they'd want to choose someplace with access to road and phone nets easily....
__________________
Never underestimate the power of a dark clown
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old May 22nd, 2006, 09:35 PM
Arachnid Arachnid is offline
Arachnid once more.
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1000 or more
I think NYC, LA or Texas would piss off to many people, Centrepolis Kansas would be inoffensive. After the temporary capital of NORAD a purpose built capital would be built in the middle of the US, or even depending on the cleanlinss of the nuke DC.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jape View Post
I would shudder at this but I can't get over Thande's insinuation there's a moderately popular Kinnock sex doll out there.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old May 22nd, 2006, 10:32 PM
WilyBadger WilyBadger is offline
Proud Phoenician!
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 423
I never really thought about what might have gotten rid of DC, but let's say it was a terrorist attack, and that now it's five years later. A temporary capital of Mount Weather (or whatever), had been used, but now it's time to set up a more permanent location. What do we pick?
__________________
Badgeriffic!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old May 22nd, 2006, 10:38 PM
Wendell Wendell is offline
Panned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lost in what might have been
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by WilyBadger
I never really thought about what might have gotten rid of DC, but let's say it was a terrorist attack, and that now it's five years later. A temporary capital of Mount Weather (or whatever), had been used, but now it's time to set up a more permanent location. What do we pick?
I am sticking by my prior locales.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old May 22nd, 2006, 11:29 PM
Electric Monk Electric Monk is offline
Does Your Believing For You
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Independent Republic of Calgarystan.
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thande
Which begs the question: does the US have plans for the order of priority for alternative seats of government? (Answer is probably, but they're classified). In the UK for example, if London is destroyed, government rule is automatically transferred to Edinburgh (if it's a one-off disaster/strike), or the TURNSTILE bunker complex near the Cotswolds (if it's a full blown MAD).
Edited selection from: http://dc.indymedia.org/newswire/display/18984

The Federal Relocation Arc, a system of ninety-six shelters for specific U.S. Government agencies, sweeps through North Carolina, Virginia, West Virginia, Maryland, and Pennsylvania. A duplicate of the Pentagon is located at a site called Raven Rock in Maryland. The administrative center of the whole system, and the place where the top civilians would go, is Mount Weather.


Directly From: http://www.metropolismag.com/html/co...01/ob/ob7.html

But things have changed since Kennedy's day, notes defense policy analyst John Pike. With the cessation of the Cold War, places like Mount Weather have seen their budgets cut; the Federal Reserve's bunker in Culpepper, Virginia--would-be home to the postapocalyptic economy--now belongs to the Library of Congress. Now that anyone with Internet access can sneak a glimpse of Mount Weather or Area 51 via satellite imagery, many view such secret redoubts as strategically obsolete, like hulking mainframe computers in an age of distributed networks. The planning now, Pike says, is "much more focused on things like an anthrax attack on the Washington Metro subway system rather than an 11,000 megaton lay-down general nuclear exchange.



As for the capital I'm echoing Denver. It's central, and well protected. You have NORAD at Peterson Airforce Base, you have Cheyenne Mountain on it's big ass springs for a bunker, space command, half a dozen military bases... etc.

Metro Denver office space also a 15 odd percent vacancy rate. And has 1.2 million square feet under construction. So the Government could probably do ok if had to wait for permanent buildings.

Last edited by Electric Monk; May 22nd, 2006 at 11:42 PM..
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.