WI: Authoritarian Spain after Franco

Francisco Franco took power in Spain with the backing of Fascists in the 1930s, held onto power through the war (supporting, but not allying with the Axis), and held onto power until his death in 1975. And Franco fully intended for the authoritarian Spanish State to continue after his death, which is why he made later king Juan Carlos his successor; the later king had carefully gotten himself into Franco's favor and convinced Franco he was loyal, and then parlayed his authority after Franco's death to tear down the Spanish dictatorship and a restore a democratic state.

The issue is what if Spain had, following Franco, continued as an authoritarian dictatorship? And that is not difficult to do (the longevity of it is another issue): other potential successors would have continued a dictatorship or would have lead an absolute monarchy of some type.
 
Had Admiral Luis Blanco not been assassinated then the authoritarian state could have survived until the 1980s at least. Blanco would have probably been forced to liberalize things over the years but Spain would have remained an indisputable dictatorship for as long as he was at the reigns.
 
If there is not democratic reforms, the shit could hit the fan very badly. Franco's last years were not pleasant, with the opposition progressivelly stronger, more active and more audacius. Industrial workers and students became a pain in the ass for the regime during the late 60's and early 70's. Even the traditional falangist stronghold, the Vertical Unions, had been infiltrated by the opposition through the Comisiones Obreras (Worker's Comissions) You had also active armed groups, like ETA (who killed Carrero Blanco), MIL or FRAP and after 1975 GRAPO. Meanwhile, the international economic crisis had its worse effects over spanish economy in the late 70's, the unemployement and inflation skyrocketed, and Spain became the european country with the largest number of strikes and social conflicts. In the meantime, the regime had lost its traditional internal cohesion and there was an open political war between the regime's famillies, mainly Falange vs Opus Dei. Increasingly sectors of the regime considered that a democratic reform was necessary, both because their economical interests were aimed towards the european common market and because they feared a social explossion, specially after the Carnation Revolution. At this point, France and Germany were supporting opposition organizations activelly and specially the SPD was funding the PSOE, while the PCE had developed a strong and active network inside the country. There had been already contacts between the opposition parties and moderate elements from the regime in 1962, the so-called "Munich Plot" by francoist press (in fact, the expression they used in spanish was "Contubernio de Munich", that sounds rather comical because too bombastic. It loses in translation)

Those sectors inside the regime who wanted a democratic reform where the ones supporting Juan Carlos, since they understood that either the started a controlled demolition of National-Catholicism so they would keep their power quota or they would fall with the regime. In the early 70's it was clear that spanish society demanded democracy. In fact, there are already polls in the mid 60's made the FOESSA Fundation that showed an overwhelming support for a democratic republic. The arrival of european tourists in those years and the opening to the outside world that it brought, the economical development and the creation of an urban middle class, not to mention the mass emigration from rural areas to cities conforming a large urban proletariat, sometimes living with very poor services and very bad conditions regarding housing and infrastructures where also elements that dorve the change. Summarizing, people wanted to live like the frenchs or the italians and not under the thumb of priests and the boot of the army. So, as you see, it was much more than Juan Carlos what restored democracy in Spain.

So, a continuation of the regime would be extremelly conflictive, and the conflicts seen during OTL transition to democracy (that was not pleasant at all, including hundreds of deaths in demonstrations, strikes and acts of terrorism by both far left and far right groups) probably would be only increased. I don't think the country would fall in a civil war, however, since the trauma caused by the 1936-39 war was still very present and was a ghost haunting spaniards all along the political spectre. Nobody, or almost nobody, wanted another round of people being shot in roadsides.

And as possible sucessors, you have Luis Carrero Blanco as mentioned, if he had not been killed. Also, if Carrero Blanco still goes beyond our world, Carlos Arias Navarro, strongman of the ultras after Franco's death and PM before Adolfo Suárez could be a candidate. Probably we can find a large set of candidates, but I''ve not the mind for that at this moment.
 
Last edited:

LordKalvert

Banned
It depends how much repression the regime is willing to do. If its like North Korea, then the regime would survive to the present day without much difficulty.

And all it would take is for Juan Carlos to have had the will
 
Had Admiral Luis Blanco not been assassinated then the authoritarian state could have survived until the 1980s at least. Blanco would have probably been forced to liberalize things over the years but Spain would have remained an indisputable dictatorship for as long as he was at the reigns.

Bingo. Bourbon restoration was a last-ditch effort by Franco to ensure continuation of authoritarian rule after his protege was killed, which obviously failed(his plan, not Blanco's death).

Caudillo Blanco, though, might not be much different. Blanco was even less of an ideological Falangist than Franco was. Blanco was a monarchist who supported a liberalized economy and was one of the main drivers of the push away from the syndicates in the immediate postwar period.

Seeing as Blanco was only 12 years younger than Franco, I think he'd try to rehabilitate the monarchy to take power after his death just like Franco did OTL.
 
Bingo. Bourbon restoration was a last-ditch effort by Franco to ensure continuation of authoritarian rule after his protege was killed, which obviously failed(his plan, not Blanco's death).

Caudillo Blanco, though, might not be much different. Blanco was even less of an ideological Falangist than Franco was. Blanco was a monarchist who supported a liberalized economy and was one of the main drivers of the push away from the syndicates in the immediate postwar period.

Seeing as Blanco was only 12 years younger than Franco, I think he'd try to rehabilitate the monarchy to take power after his death just like Franco did OTL.

Juan Carlos was proclaimed sucessor in 1969 and Carrero was killed in 1973. Things were bot that straightfoward...And sorry for the nitpicking, but it's Carrrero or Carrero Blanco, not Blanco. Carrero is the first surname and Blanco the second, as is the naming system in hispanicncountries. Sometimes people uses prrferibly their second surname, but only if the first is very usual, like in José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, known as Zapatero becau Rodríguez is too common)

I don't think northkorean levels of repression would be possible in Spain without sparking a civil war, yes in this context yes, and very probably and international intervention, since the european neighbours were preferred a democratic Spain and would want that kind of instability in their backyard, not to mention that the regime had already softened its hand in an attempt to gain international respectability.


And for the aforementioned in my previous post, social, economical and political circumstances didn't let Juan Carlos another option if he wanted to keep the throne. Not to me tion that his supporters and protectors inside the regime where mainly those supporting a reform, amongst them members of the Opus Dei who had already designed a transition plan in the 60's. Had he tried another way and he would have found politically isolated inside and with a hostile people outside.
 
To have an idea of the circumstances...the last mass execution during the francoism was the Burgos Proccess in 1970, when several ETA and FRAP members were executed. It was percived as a remembrance if the years of fear, the 40's and 50's and caused interbationak outrage and sanctions. Now, at this point the Opus Dei was clearly winning the political struggke with Falange. And who was the Opus Dei backbone? Industrials and bankers. People who wantes to make bussines and access to the international markets. They didn't want an isolated country. That gives an idea of thr fracture amkngst the big fushes. As saie, a karge majority of the spanish people wanted democracy, welfare and a bit if hedonisn, simple things like the opportunity to wacht the las Holkywood blockbuster without censirship or the last french adult movie without needing to cross the frontier, ir to kiss your girlfriend in public without risking a fine, ir to have your street lroperly paved and nit being treated like terrorist for demanding it and the such.

Also, if the involutionism manage to prolonge the dictatorship, you will see a giid flow if french francs, deutsche marks and rublos to the opposition. Maybe even US Dollars, thoug this is less probable...
 
As saie, a karge majority of the spanish people wanted democracy, welfare and a bit if hedonisn, simple things like the opportunity to wacht the las Holkywood blockbuster without censirship or the last french adult movie without needing to cross the frontier, ir to kiss your girlfriend in public without risking a fine, ir to have your street lroperly paved and nit being treated like terrorist for demanding it and the such.

Gente que sólo desea su pan,
su hembra y la fiesta en paz.

:D
 
Juan Carlos was proclaimed sucessor in 1969 and Carrero was killed in 1973. Things were bot that straightfoward...And sorry for the nitpicking, but it's Carrrero or Carrero Blanco, not Blanco. Carrero is the first surname and Blanco the second, as is the naming system in hispanicncountries. Sometimes people uses prrferibly their second surname, but only if the first is very usual, like in José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, known as Zapatero becau Rodríguez is too common)

I don't think northkorean levels of repression would be possible in Spain without sparking a civil war, yes in this context yes, and very probably and international intervention, since the european neighbours were preferred a democratic Spain and would want that kind of instability in their backyard, not to mention that the regime had already softened its hand in an attempt to gain international respectability.


And for the aforementioned in my previous post, social, economical and political circumstances didn't let Juan Carlos another option if he wanted to keep the throne. Not to me tion that his supporters and protectors inside the regime where mainly those supporting a reform, amongst them members of the Opus Dei who had already designed a transition plan in the 60's. Had he tried another way and he would have found politically isolated inside and with a hostile people outside.

You are entirely correct. For some reason my mind switched the dates of CB's assassination and the proclamation of John Charles as Prince of Spain.
 

Redhand

Banned
Franco at heart was always a monarchist more than a fascist and I believe he would have given power to the Bourbons at his death anyways, Blanco or not.
 
To have an idea of the circumstances...the last mass execution during the francoism was the Burgos Proccess in 1970, when several ETA and FRAP members were executed. It was percived as a remembrance if the years of fear, the 40's and 50's and caused interbationak outrage and sanctions. Now, at this point the Opus Dei was clearly winning the political struggke with Falange. And who was the Opus Dei backbone? Industrials and bankers. People who wantes to make bussines and access to the international markets. They didn't want an isolated country. That gives an idea of thr fracture amkngst the big fushes. As saie, a karge majority of the spanish people wanted democracy, welfare and a bit if hedonisn, simple things like the opportunity to wacht the las Holkywood blockbuster without censirship or the last french adult movie without needing to cross the frontier, ir to kiss your girlfriend in public without risking a fine, ir to have your street lroperly paved and nit being treated like terrorist for demanding it and the such.

Also, if the involutionism manage to prolonge the dictatorship, you will see a giid flow if french francs, deutsche marks and rublos to the opposition. Maybe even US Dollars, thoug this is less probable...

A clarification:

The Burgos Process (1970) was the antepenultimate larger process against opponents of the dictatorship, but all death sentences were commuted to imprisonment due to popular protests and international pressure.

The Process 1001 (1973), was the penultimate larger process against opponents, was against the direction of illegal trade union called CCOO (Comisiones Obreras, Worker's Comissions) and the trial began precisely the day was assassinated President Luis Carrero Blanco. Therefore, the judgment was influenced by the attack, because the sentence was consistent with all requests made by the prosecutor (the maximum penalty was 20 years; there was no death sentences); however the Supreme Court recess all penalties after a year, but the new King Juan Carlos I pardoned them all after three days of his reign.

The last larger process against opponents of the Francoist dictatorship was at 1975, in which got to realize the execution by firing squad of several of the convicted (2 ETA and 3 FRAP members) -some of those convicted were sentenced to death received conmutation to imprisonment-.


If he had been the prince appointed by Franco as his successor, the Franco regime would probably have continued after the death of Franco because Alfonso had a penchant for the related sectors to Falangism.
 
Top