The Life and Times of First Duchess of Cumberland

The Life and Times of Frances Bard, the Duchess of Cumberland

That's my first attempt at the timeline here. The POD is "what if Rupert of Rhine legally married Lady Frances Bard in 1664". It is also an attempt at "keep protestant Stuart line on English throne", though, so no "King Rupert the First" here. Elector Palatine Rupert, though... is promised.

The Life and Times of Frances Bard, the Duchess of Cumberland
Chapter 1
The love story that saved the House of Stuarts

220px-Frances_Bard_%28c_1646-1708%29_by_Peter_Lely.jpg
[FONT=&quot]
Frances Bard, the Duchess of Cumberland since 1664, Electress of Palatinate since 1685 (1644-1708)
POD: In 1664, Prince Rupert of the Rhine, Duke of Cumberland and Earl of Holderness, enters the chambers of king Charles II with an unusual request – request to permit Rupert’s marriage with Lady Frances Bard, the only daughter of late Sir Henry Bard, 1st Viscount Bellomont.
The marriage was pretty scandalous since the bride was a daughter of Irish catholic, not to mention a daughter of mere Viscount. However, there was a precedent of an English prince of blood marrying a commoner – James, Duke of York married Anne Hyde, thus Charles II has no legal way to discourage his cousin from marrying a commoner, since he had not discouraged his brother from doing the same thing.
As a wedding present Rupert gets the positions of Constable of Windsor Castle and the Ranger of the Great Park. The Byfield House coming with the second position becomes known as the Cumberland Lodge from now on, since it’s now an official countryside residence of the Duke and Duchess of Cumberland (OTL it also became known as the Cumberland Lodge, but in honor of another Duke of Cumberland).
300px-Cumberland-lodge.jpg

Cumberland Lodge view
The relations with Charles-Louis, Rupert’s elder brother and Elector Palatine, became rather strained due to this marriage, which is morganatic by Palatinate standards. However Charles-Louis, with his bigamous family life and the whole mess with Raugravine Marie Luise von Degenfeld is not the person to lecture his brother on marriage matters and quickly realizes this. So he merely congratulates Rupert on marriage, though warning him that Rupert’s children from such a marriage may not be able to inherit Palatinate.
At first English court thought that the Duke of Cumberland’s marriage was based on the same thing as Duke of York marriage – i.e. bride’s unexpected pregnancy. If so, they were deeply disappointed that the firstborn of Duke and Duchess of Cumberland was born only in January 1666 – a healthy baby boy named Dudley Rupert of Palatinate-Simmern, known since birth by courtesy title Earl of Holderness.
Despite his mother being a Catholic, Rupert saw that his son was christened in Anglican Faith. The godfather of infant Earl of Holderness was just slightly less infant James Stuart, Duke of Cambridge. The godmother by proxy was Henriette-Anne, Duchess of Orleans, who Rupert courted for some time in 1659 before her departure to France.
220px-James%2C_Duke_of_Cambridge_-_Wright_1666-7.jpg

James, Duke of Cambridge, wearing the regalia of Order of Garter
As a “reverse courtesy”, Rupert also was a godfather of Charles Stuart, Duke of Kendall, second son of James of York (Note: In OTL, the godfather of Charles Stuart was his elder brother James Stuart, Duke of Cambridge).
Both young fathers, however, were soon deprived from the family pleasures and recalled to the battlefront. With two married family relations of his, one with heir and second with heir and a spare, Charles decided to allow both join the navy and participate in the Four Day Battle and St. James’ Day Battle (Note: In OTL the Duke of York was recalled from the fleet after the Battle of Lowestoft and replaced by Rupert as the senior commander of the fleet, but here, when Rupert is also married and with a son, Charles decides that allowing them both take the risk would be more fair and favorable for English case, than either sending them both away or sending only Rupert to the front) which ended in the total victory for British fleet.
The epidemics of bubonic plague in 1666-1667 was, however, a deep strike o the British royal family. Rupert and James were both recalled to accompany the King in London. Rupert, genuinely scared for well-being of his family, told pregnant Frances with infant Dudley to stay in Windsor and not in the plague-filled city. Frances asked the Duke of York for permission to send his older son, James, with them “so that young Dudley will have a playmate”. Despite King being adamant that the whole Royal Family stays in London during disaster days, he’s not a sadist and weeping beautiful women touch somewhat of a soft spot in his heart.
The Duke of Cambridge remains with the Duchess of Cumberland and young Earl of Holderness till the end of epidemics. The “miracle of House of Stuart” becomes even more evident when Rupert’s godson Charles of Kendall dies in May 1667 (In OTL both Charles and James died in the epidemics outbreak). The Duchess of Cumberland would later be regarded by the English in the same way as the governess of Louis XV for saving main line of House of Bourbon from extinction. Ironically, a protestant line of Stuarts was saved by a Catholic Duchess of Cumberland.
However, the Royal Family soon welcomes two new additions – Edgar, Duke of Kendall (“the second Duke of Kendall” or “the spare Duke” as the infant is called informally, to distinguish him from Charles of Kendall) born in September 1667 and Ruperta-Elisabeth of Cumberland, a second child of Rupert and Frances, born on December 16, 1667 – “a birthday present” for Rupert, as he jokes. At the same year young Dudley Holderness receives his first “real” non-courtesy title becoming as his uncle, 2nd Viscount, dies fighting the French at St. Kits. The title of Viscount of Bellomont is recreated in peerage of England, and then “upgraded” to the earldom. So the courtesy title of Earl of Holderness is pushed aside by the title of 1st Earl of Bellomont, as young Dudley-Rupert of Palatinate-Simmern is now known at court.
A military life for Rupert and James of York is however not all rosy and nice as the Second English-Dutch war ends in rather ugly stalemate following the Raid of Medway. That forced the signing of the Treaty of Breda ending the war as in OTL. Ironically, the victory of Dutch was Pyrric and it lead to the downfall of de Witt regime later on, as Treaty of Breda managed to piss off both Charles II and Louis XIV.
In 1670 Henriette, the Duchess of Orleans, dies of gastric ulcer perforation with frequent rumors about her being poisoned circulating in both French and English courts. Young Dudley Rupert of Palatinate-Simmern is now old enough to understand the death of his godmother which he mourns deeply. The same year, however, the Cumberland family welcomes new addition – a boy named Maurice in honor of Rupert’s late brother, healthy and “too damn loud” by his father’s account.
In 1671 the Duchess of York dies of cancer, two of her children – 3-years old Edgar of Kendall and 8-months old Catherine of York following her to the grave the same year. James of York is left with three surviving children – Mary, born in 1662, James, Duke of Cambridge, born in 1663 (for whom his father and uncle already began to search a suitable bride), and Anne, born in 1665. Unlike OTL, having a surviving healthy son puts him under no pressure to marry, much less marry a niece of scandalous Duchess of Mazaren, so he discards this marriage idea (not to mention Mary of Modena is closer in age to James of Cambridge, for whom she’s also regarded as a bride).
In the circle of his friends James jokes about marrying Anne, Duchess of Montpensier, “the smallpox-scarred hag” (though the Duke is no paragon of beauty at the moment) who is right now too busy weaseling out of marrying Philippe of Orleans and attempting to marry Lauzin. Ironically, both Charles II and Louis XIV find the joke funny enough to try it, or so it seems – Anne gets into real bad quarrel with the rest of Royal Family about Lauzin and is proposed a “loophole” with marriage to the Duke of York as the way of strengthening the Treaty of Dover which quickly becomes a “non-secret-secret” among European courts.
190px-Anne_Marie_Louise_d%27Orl%C3%A9ans_by_Pierre_Bourguignon_holding_a_portrait_of_her_father.jpg

Anne de Montpensier, the Grand Mademoiselle, the second wife of the Duke of York
In 1672 at the start of Third English-Dutch War Anne de Montpensier reluctantly becomes a Duchess of York, Albany and Normandy. This marriage will allow her to become a Queen – considering Catherine of Braganza is barren and considering Duke of York outlives his brother, which is possible. At least this is better than marrying openly gay man or getting estranged from the whole royal family. As part of marriage contract she sells the titles of Duchess of Saint-Fargeau and Châtellerault to the Duke of Orleans, and sells the title of Princess of Joinville to the crown (the principality is later given to the Duke of Maine, the illegitimate son of Louis XIV and Madame de Montespan) , and is allowed to keep the rest of her titles as the personal property of her and her heirs (shall she have any, since she’s almost 45 years old at this point). Provided she fails to have heirs with Duke of York, all her titles, bar ones belonging to the Duchy of Normandy territorially (the Duke of York is titled Duke of Normandy in France since 1660), so the worst case loss for the French crown is County of Eu. The marriage is viewed as an exile and a even as practical joke pulled by two kings on their unfortunate relatives. Since the Duchess of Montpensier is near 45 years old at the moment, nobody expects her to have any children, but at least she has 90% chance to become a queen unless Catherine of Braganza suddenly carries a child to term, if only for a few years. The Cavalier Parliament does not see any danger to Protestant inheritance in aging princess, and thus never gets suspended unlike OTL. Lauzin, who served under the Duke of York in Flanders, follows his not-to-be wife to England to start one of the craziest love triangles of era. Considering that Lauzin was “the ugliest sex god ever”, and the official mistress of James of York, Arabella Churchill, was also rather plain woman, the family matters of the Yorks were worth a good comedy.
Jokes aside, the marriage to the Grande Mademoiselle now gives her two stepdaughters access to the large dowry, and Charles and James have found a suitable bride for James of Cambridge – Ulrika Eleonora of Denmark (yes, THAT Ulrika Eleonora, OTL mother of Charles XII of Sweden). The Danes proved to be allies in the Second English-Dutch war (despite plunder in Bergen ending up as a failure) and the French court had nothing against this marriage serving to keep the Dutch at bay (no pun intended). James and Ulrika Eleonora were to be married in 1678 when the groom is 15 years old, the betrothal being held in 1673 (thus the English court beats Sweden to it). That ensured the continuation of the Protestant line of Stuarts.
[/FONT][FONT=&quot]
180px-Ulrikaeleonoradanmarknorge.jpg

Ulrika Eleonora of Denmark and Norway, Duchess of Cambridge since 1678, Princess of Wales since 1685
In 1674 Louis-Henry of Simmern-Kaiserslautern dies, and von Simmern secundogeniture title, Duke of Simmern-Kaiserslautern , becomes vacant. Charles-Louis writes to Rupert, offering him to return and to pay the Imperial tax which will allow his marriage with Frances Bard to be recognized as legal in Holy Roman Empire. Rupert agrees to pay the tax from the incomes of Simmern-Kaiserslautern Duchy, but disagrees to return. Due to barren wife and legion of mistresses of Charles II and strange comedy of the second marriage of the Duke of York at least one prince of blood has to stay in England to give the example of a happily married man – that to be Rupert. However, Rupert agrees to send his second son, Maurice, to his uncle to be taught Palatinate laws and customs and serve as “spare presumptive”. Dudley stays in England with his mother (at this point Rupert still hopes that Wilhelmine Ernestine of Denmark carries a child to term, so he won’t have to return to dull Heidelberg, however he’s happy with Maurice getting a secundogeniture, since he doesn’t want his second son to end up like him – with long, prestigious, but empty title, and having a real thing in form of Imperial principality, even as tiny as Kaiserslautern, will be definitely good for the boy).
Charles-Louis' daughter, Liselotte, as OTL, married Philippe of Orleans, thus creating the intricate network of marriage alliances between France, England, Palatinate and Denmark.

What of Mary of Modena in TTL? In 1676 the eighteen-old Mary was married to the 15-years old Charles the Bewitched, as Mary’s mother planned. Those plans were assisted by Don John of Austria Jr., ambitious illegitimate half brother of young king, who saw in that pragmatic daughter of upstart Italian an opportunity in both seizing power from Dowager Queen-Regent Marianna, and a vital instrument for saving the glory of Spain as he sees it… the role which a princess of…well, bluer blood won’t be able to fulfill.[/FONT]
 
Last edited:
I wanted to make a "Getting rid of Glorious Revolution AND Nine-Years War as we know it" timeline WITHOUT many of cliches (though one of cliches AKA Anne de Montpensier as Queen of England is the one I decided to parody here, but with no pressure of making male heir Charles II and Louis XIV may entertain themselves with practical joke which fulfills James' financial ambitions and keeps eccentric princess away from French court while marrying somebody meaningful to French politics) and married Rupert and surviving James of Cambridge (who OTL was unfortunate enough to stay in London during epidemics with the rest of Royal family) seemed to me the best ways to do that. I hope to make it an entertaining timeline:)

Also sorry for any errors in the text - my first language is Russian.
 
I'm also entertaining an idea to have a "child of frying pan" in this timeline, not in England but in Spain (but also starring Mary of Modena, TTL Queen of Spain). Having the affair with Don Juan Jose of Austria circa 1678 to piss off Queen Mother and giving birth to a child from him - of Habsburg (though illegitimate parentage) blood, that could be passed as a child sired by king.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_of_Austria_the_Younger
That's the possible father. Bonus point if the child, "the last of Spanish Habsburgs" is a girl. That keeps things interesting enough while postponing OTL war of Spanish Inheritance (though this will be a Juana Beltraneja 2.0 but a legitimate heir to Spanish throne nevertheless).
Though I probably won't do that (despite Mary of Modena, unlike princess Marie-Louise of Orleans, is a pragmatic enough person to indulge in such an affair AND then do nothing when queen-mother's supporters kill John) since it will be too ASB'ish, or maybe not?
 
Very interesting. However I feel I must point out how very unlikely it is for le Grand Mademoiselle to be married to the Duke of York. The Duchesse de Montpensier was a very rich and powerful woman, so I doubt she would consent to the marriage. Also, James has one son. I can't see Charles as willing to risk the extinction of the House of Stuart on a joke marriage (not to mention that Charles wasn't one to do such a thing). Oh and courtesy and consort titles aren't numbered. Again good start but it could use some work.
 
Interesting thoughts here and I like the departures from OTL and how you are going from there. I shall follow with interest. :)
 
Very interesting. However I feel I must point out how very unlikely it is for le Grand Mademoiselle to be married to the Duke of York. The Duchesse de Montpensier was a very rich and powerful woman, so I doubt she would consent to the marriage. Also, James has one son. I can't see Charles as willing to risk the extinction of the House of Stuart on a joke marriage (not to mention that Charles wasn't one to do such a thing). Oh and courtesy and consort titles aren't numbered. Again good start but it could use some work.

The Duchess of Montpensier marriage was something "out of left field" and OOC "thrown in", however you must remember that in 1670 she was offered to marry Philippe of Orleans and refused due to him being considered too "infantile" for her tastes. She also tried to get married to Lauzin the same year (this ended with him being thrown in Bastille). So the marriage is offered as a "third opinion" and additional support for the Treaty of Dover (the marriage of Mary of York to Dauphin being staunchly opposed by Parliament). A marriage to a princess of French royal family, monetary aid and getting rid of undesirable relative - all at the same time.
Here York is allowed to marry the spinstress since he has surviving and healthy son (James of Cambridge) ITL and is under no pressure to marry a fertile woman urgently. Let alone Mary of Modena, whose aunt is already building herself quite an infamy at French, English and Savoyard courts. "Need to produce a spare" is not as pressing as "need to produce a heir". Basically the same reasoning here as OTL refusal of William III to enter the second marriage cause nobody expected the Duke of Glouchester to die when 11 years old.
That's an ASB'ish moment here, but really it's not that ASB'ish - the mini-POD is Anne pissing off Louis a little bit more with Lauzin marriage idea after refusing to marry his brother. And the Treaty of Dover turns out to be a nice little convenience to get rid of annoying relative while providing a monetary sponsorship to English case.
Also there is always a case of "moving desirable protestant heir up the succession line by marriage" for spare and TTL Cumberland boys will be considered a desirable alternative to William of Orange. So we definitely will see an alternate marriage of Mary of York here. Anne may or may not marry her OTL husband cause double marriage with Denmark is highly unlikely.
Titles, however, are the bug - I'm not too knowledgeable on consort titles convention.
 
Last edited:
The Duchess of Montpensier marriage was something "out of left field" and OOC "thrown in", however you must remember that in 1670 she was offered to marry Philippe of Orleans and refused due to it being considered "infantile". She also tried to get married to Lauzin the same year (this ended with him being thrown in Bastille). So the marriage is offered as a "third opinion" and additional support for the Treaty of Dover (the marriage of Mary of York to Dauphin being staunchly opposed by Parliament). A marriage to a princess of French royal family, monetary aid and getting rid of undesirable relative - all at the same time.
Here York is allowed to marry the spinstress since he has surviving and healthy son (James of Cambridge) ITL and is under no pressure to marry a fertile woman urgently. Let alone Mary of Modena, whose aunt is already building herself quite an infamy at French, English and Savoyard courts. "Need to produce a spare" is not as pressing as "need to produce a heir". Basically the same reasoning here as OTL refusal of William III to enter the second marriage cause nobody expected the Duke of Glouchester to die when 11 years old.
That's an ASB'ish moment here, but really it's not that ASB'ish - the mini-POD is Anne pissing off Louis a little bit more with Lauzin marriage idea after refusing to marry his brother. And the Treaty of Dover turns out to be a nice little convenience to get rid of annoying relative while providing a monetary sponsorship to English case.
Also there is always a case of "moving desirable protestant heir up the succession line by marriage" for spare and TTL Cumberland boys will be considered a desirable alternative to William of Orange. So we definitely will see an alternate marriage of Mary of York here. Anne may or may not marry her OTL husband cause double marriage with Denmark is highly unlikely.
Titles, however, are the bug - I'm not too knowledgeable on consort titles convention.

But remember both of the proposed marriages involved her staying in France and keeping her wealth. I'm pretty sure she would never leave France for anything other than being made a Queen/Empress. Plus leaving only one heir seems unlikely. But we'll agree to disagree on that one. As to Mary of York marrying a Cumberland, always a possibility but with a male heir for her father, could we not see her making a more... advantageous match? Perhaps to either Charles XI of Sweden or even le Grand Dauphin?

And as to titles, Frances' titles wouldn't have a number and her son would be 1st Viscount Bellomont, as that title would have gone extinct at the 2nd Viscount's death, and the title would have to be recreated.
 
She's leaving France to become the possible Queen, marrying a heir to the throne - that marriage is both to strengthen the financial position of English court and to keep England an ally. She won't become a Queen only if Duke of York predeceases his brother and/or Charles II remarries (Queen Catherine being barren is a known fact). So it's 90% solid chance to become a queen.

I think that Mary will marry Charles XI of Sweden, Anne, however, will marry young Earl of Holderness (and thus she's a future Electress Palatine).

As for William III marriage TTL, I propose this girl
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juliane_Louise_of_East_Frisia
Her father nealry married William's aunt, so the Cirksenas have some ties to the House of Orange.

Le Grande Dauphin may marry Marie Louise of Orleans here, since Mary of Modena is marrying to Spanish court as her mother planned initially (and probably gets involved in VERY scandalous story, though I'm not sure about butterflying the War of Spanish Succession away entirely with "Beltraneja 2.0").
 
Last edited:
https://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=166064&highlight=Montpensier
I based the idea of sold estates on this TL, and selling of Dombes to Duke of Maine happened OTL. In the TL above she was allowed to keep Dombes and Eu (an error, though, since with POD in 1647 County of Eu still belongs to Guises, it was sold to Anne only in 1654). In my TL she keeps Eu and other Normandian estates, with her husband being titular Duke of Normandy since 1660.
And it's not like she gives it away for nothing - she'll receive (rather large) compensation in cash from French crown for selling her non-Normandian property. Or maybe selling part of them and stipulating that shall she die childless, the rest of her titles are to be inherited by Duke of Orleans (sounds the most plausible cause monetizing her fiefs is a CRAZY sum of money).
 
Last edited:
I only know some of the details of this era but your explanations for your departures seem plausible. It will be interesting if in this timeline Mary and Anne can give birth to viable children that live to adulthood.
 
Mary - most likely (Charles XI of Sweden is not related to her in any way), Anne - I don't know since here she's still marrying a second cousin (even closer relation that OTL marriage with George of Denmark) but since even with George she had one child surviving post infancy - surviving issue is possible.
TTL Charles XII of Sweden will be a different person from OTL one. Since the issue of ALL the Danish princesses of this generation (in Saxony, Holstein and Sweden) seemed to be...rather crazy-military-bent (August the Strong and Charles XII being the most prominent specimen of craziness). In TTL a piece of this craziness goes to Stuarts. *Charles III of England and Scotland is going to be a...really special kind of king.
 
Mary - most likely (Charles XI of Sweden is not related to her in any way), Anne - I don't know since here she's still marrying a second cousin (even closer relation that OTL marriage with George of Denmark) but since even with George she had one child surviving post infancy - surviving issue is possible.
TTL Charles XII of Sweden will be a different person from OTL one. Since the issue of ALL the Danish princesses of this generation (in Saxony, Holstein and Sweden) seemed to be...rather crazy-military-bent (August the Strong and Charles XII being the most prominent specimen of craziness). In TTL a piece of this craziness goes to Stuarts. *Charles III of England and Scotland is going to be a...really special kind of king.


Hopefully Charlie 3 will not be the short yellow bus type. It will be intersting to see who C3 parents will be.
 
Given that Mary and Anne were relatively competent queens, I think that their brother will fare no worse as a King. At least not as stubborn as his father.

And Ulrika Eleonora was regarded in Sweden as a "very model of a good Protestant queen" which says something considering that she's a Danish princess and Denmark and Sweden were enemies. I think that she'll be no worse as a Princess of Wales and later a Queen (if she dies later that OTL which is totally possible due to different climate).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ulrika_Eleonora_of_Denmark#Life_as_queen
 
Last edited:
I think that Stuart line TTL goes like that:
James II - 1685-1701 (The Papist Decade, as it later becomes known to historians)
James III (James of Cambridge) - 1701-1715 (I think he'll live roughly as long as his sister Anne OTL)
Charles III (born in 1680) - 1715-?
 
I think that Stuart line TTL goes like that:
James II - 1685-1701 (The Papist Decade, as it later becomes known to historians)
James III (James of Cambridge) - 1701-1715 (I think he'll live roughly as long as his sister Anne OTL)
Charles III (born in 1680) - 1715-?

Ok looking nice and your hint/forboding comment about Charles 3 should have its reveal soon. I will wonder how many kids James 3 will have and what marriages may result. Also will it happen that Hannover will get joined with England or stay on a seperate course?
 
Hannover will stay totally separate, since there's no chance of them being kings of England with at least two Palatinate branches more senior than them. They won't even become electors in TTL, since their electorate was created when catholic Neuburg branch inherited Palatinate to make protestants and catholics equal in the Electoral College (which won't happen TTL with Duke of Cumberland having a heir and a spare). Totally forgettable northern German state.
 
BTW, the marriage of Mary with Charles XI is doubtful since if he does not marry Ulrica Eleonora there's this lady -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juliana_of_Hesse-Eschwege
- groomed at Swedish court since childhood as a bride for Charles XI and highly preferred by his mom. With Ulrika Eleonora taken Charles will may simply marry her.
However, if she's as "faithful" to her fiancé as OTL, this will be doomed as failure and Mary becomes a desirable bride for the King of Sweden. Mary was never as docile as Ulrika Eleonora so the conflicts with her mother-in-law will be abound, and dynastic marriages with BOTH Denmark and Sweden will drag England into all sorts of Baltic conflicts - not to mention the LOL of James II trying to be the arbiter in conflict of the Baltic countries.

The marriage to Le Grande Dauphin will most likely fail and will cost James II what little remains of his rep even with surviving protestant son, the marriage to the king of Sweden brings nothing but headache with the whole Sweden-Denmark business, the marriage to George of Denmark - possible and more likely that OTL marriage to William III which was "moving the desirable heir up the line" which is pretty much redundant here with Palatinate cousins being preferable for "hidden spare" as compared to William. OTL George I of Hannover may be regarded as well, but at the very end of the list, since he's a vocabulary definition of nobody - not even an elector TTL.
 
Last edited:
I always learn little bits of trivia in various timelines. Thanks for making things interesting. :)

It would be a BAD thing for England to get dragged into the Baltic Wars. She had enough on her plate. If a type of War of Spanish Sucession breaks out, or another country takes that "crown"
..yikes. :eek:
 
Top