You're supposing that Imperial Russia has its act together and can spare the skilled manpower and resources to do so. By 1917, they had food riots going on, couldn't get bullets for infantry rifles, and you want them to build and use tanks?
You'd need a decade of clearing out deadwood in the Imperial general Staff, military supply chain, agricultural and industrial development to make that possible, (better agriculture so more peasants could work in factories and get trained/educated to make/maintain/modify more complex gear while still feeding everyone and a surplus for export) much less likely and near-ASB for it to be an effectively-used force.
Sure Russia was developing into an industrial titan as it was, but the automotive industry hadn't quite solidified yet. In 1925, it'd have been much more doable, but OTL 1917 Imperial Russia needed to quit and lick its wounds.
There's only so much you can kludge together on the fly- either you pick a design and make lots more faster and wear out your people and plants, or spend a ton of money and time putting stuff together and trying a new system until you get the bugs out of the next-big-thing. Russia didn't have the skilled manpower or plant to spare for it.
Tanks had a ton of teething problems- namely the engines were wimpy unreliable beasts and getting tanks guns that could knock a hole in defenses were a late development even for the British and French who weren't starving and had mature industrial systems that could build and maintain them.
Could the Russians have built equivalent tanks?
IMO, sure, but not enough to matter, which would've completely broken their supply system. If you can't feed or supply infantry, you have no business whatsoever trying to make and field tanks.