Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Discussion: After 1900

View Poll Results: Who's More Evil
Adolf Hitler 34 65.38%
Joseph Stalin 18 34.62%
Voters: 52. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 17th, 2013, 08:33 PM
Soundgarden Soundgarden is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Sweden
Posts: 164
How Was Worse? Stalin or Hitler?

The two biggest superpowers in Europe during World War II, both men were synonomous with the term "evil." While both men had similar upbrinings and goals for World Domination, the two certainly weren't exchanging Christmas Cards with one another, especially after Hitler invaded the Eastern End of Poland. At the end of the War, Stalin emerged as the bigger superpower, but his hunger for power and his paranoia didn't end there.

That being said, who was more evil and why? While Stalin wasn't genocidal in the sense Hitler was, he killed millions of more people, though over a longer span of time, while Hitler killed about 15 to 20 million people in the span of 6 years(excluding Knight of The Long Knives).

While both men's sanity was questionable at best, Stalin could at times be reasoned with. Problem with Stalin though, was he had people murdered for the most trivial of reasons like looking at him funny or not depicting him as large and majestic(he was 5'4 and if his painters depicted him wrong, he would have them shot).

Hitler only killed people who were not what he viewed as "Aryan" or people who would even challenge his views, while Stalin would have you killed if he THOUGHT you were going to betray him, regardless of race or not.

I believe most people would say Hitler was worse for a variety of reason 1)He lost the war(you know what they say, the winner writes history), 2)Is used more often as an epiphet for evil, and 3)Stalin is still talked about in Russia, while any mention of Hitler or the Holocaust is forbidden.

Being one-quarter Jewish, I'm pretty much forced to side with Stalin, even though he wasn't the friendliest to the Jews, he wasn't officially anti-semitic like Hitler was(later in his life was a different story).

What are your thoughts?

Last edited by Soundgarden; July 17th, 2013 at 11:10 PM..
  #2  
Old July 17th, 2013, 08:37 PM
The Red The Red is offline
A virulent, ignorant bigot
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Occupied Scotland
Posts: 1000 or more
Hitler fought an alliance of Imperialists, Segregationists and Stalin yet he was still easily the worst option.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord Roem & Meadow
rising up like some vast, guild socialist bird
  #3  
Old July 17th, 2013, 08:40 PM
GiantMonkeyMan GiantMonkeyMan is offline
Dirty Red
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 373
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soundgarden View Post
Problem with Stalin though, was he had people murdered for the most trivial of reasons like looking at him funny or not depicting him as large and majestic(he was 5'4 and if his painters depicted him wrong, he would have them shot).
What's your source for this? Sounds pretty ridiculous.

Anyway, I don't like to blame a single person for a regime's failings. I think that ignores huge contextual and material factors that drove various events in history, not to mention absolves all the other people involved. That said, the Nazi regime was clearly more horrific.
  #4  
Old July 17th, 2013, 08:41 PM
zoomar zoomar is offline
Curmudgeon
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Occupied Sequoyah, CSA (Okla)
Posts: 1000 or more
Not that we haven't done this before, but the vote invariably comes out with Hitler deservedly way out in front on the evil-o-meter.
  #5  
Old July 17th, 2013, 08:49 PM
Soundgarden Soundgarden is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Sweden
Posts: 164
Quote:
Originally Posted by GiantMonkeyMan View Post
What's your source for this? Sounds pretty ridiculous.

Anyway, I don't like to blame a single person for a regime's failings. I think that ignores huge contextual and material factors that drove various events in history, not to mention absolves all the other people involved. That said, the Nazi regime was clearly more horrific.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_...#Personal_life

Under appearance.
  #6  
Old July 17th, 2013, 08:52 PM
Edward_Elric Edward_Elric is offline
Philosophical stoner
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Miami Commune, Florida ASR, UASR
Posts: 227
InB4 thread lock:

Hitler, of course.

All you really need to consider is that, while Poland had a Stalinist dictatorship imposed upon it for half a century, the alternative under Nazi dominance would've seen that nation cease to exist at all.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by /r/BadHistory
History is written by smug pseudo-intellectual hacks called Victor.
  #7  
Old July 17th, 2013, 08:55 PM
mowque mowque is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1000 or more
Send a message via MSN to mowque
How is this alternate history?
  #8  
Old July 17th, 2013, 08:57 PM
zoomar zoomar is offline
Curmudgeon
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Occupied Sequoyah, CSA (Okla)
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soundgarden View Post

...Hitler only killed people who were not what he viewed as "Aryan"
"Only?" That is the very reason that Hitler was worse than Stalin. With Hitler millions of people were condemmed to slavery or death entirely because of racial/ethnic factors they could not control. With Stalin, even considering his change in moods and paranoia, he went after people or groups of people who did, said, or believed things that he felt were threats to him (the various purges of fellow communists) or the Soviet system (clergy, capitalists, Kulaks, nationalists, etc). People possibly had at least some control over their fates under Stalin. Under Hitler, if you were a targeted untermentsch , there was absolutely nothing you could say or do to save yourself.

Plus, warped and bad as Soviet communism was, it was at least based on humane notions of acheiving equality and inclusiveness. Nazism was based on the opposite.
  #9  
Old July 17th, 2013, 08:58 PM
zoomar zoomar is offline
Curmudgeon
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Occupied Sequoyah, CSA (Okla)
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by mowque View Post
How is this alternate history?
True. This should be moved to chat.
  #10  
Old July 17th, 2013, 09:01 PM
Snowstalker Snowstalker is online now
Hi.
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1000 or more
Easily Hitler, who probably has a bigger death toll anyway if you count the combat dead on both sides in his war of aggression. While Stalin was a paranoid mass murderer guilty of quasi-genocide against Ukrainians, Tatars, etc, only Hitler sought to outright eliminate certain groups and turn a third of Europe into German colonies.

I'd argue that Pol Pot was more evil than either; thankfully, he had far fewer people to destroy and so wasn't as destructive overall.
  #11  
Old July 17th, 2013, 09:06 PM
stefanbl stefanbl is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: County Durham
Posts: 1000 or more
Send a message via Skype™ to stefanbl
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soundgarden View Post
Hitler only killed people who were not what he viewed as "Aryan" or people who would even challenge his views, while Stalin would have you killed if he THOUGHT you were going to betray him, regardless of race or not.
Hitler got plenty of Germans killed.
  #12  
Old July 17th, 2013, 09:12 PM
colleen1227 colleen1227 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 205
Lenin first ,then Stalin continued the death and enslavement of millions before the war. And Stalin continued to kill his own people even when fighting a war. The mass starvation of the Ukraine in the 30's equaled Hitler's death camps totals and that was just one nationality Stalin persecuted.So Stalin was much more the devil than Hitler but he was the left's devil so he could be excused his crimes.
  #13  
Old July 17th, 2013, 09:18 PM
DoomBunny DoomBunny is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 533
One left his country in ruins, and it didn't reunify for 45 years after his death. The other brought his country to new heights of power. Not much of a question.
  #14  
Old July 17th, 2013, 09:19 PM
mowque mowque is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1000 or more
Send a message via MSN to mowque
Quote:
Originally Posted by colleen1227 View Post
Lenin first ,then Stalin continued the death and enslavement of millions before the war. And Stalin continued to kill his own people even when fighting a war. The mass starvation of the Ukraine in the 30's equaled Hitler's death camps totals and that was just one nationality Stalin persecuted.So Stalin was much more the devil than Hitler but he was the left's devil so he could be excused his crimes.
This thread does not bring out the best in people.
  #15  
Old July 17th, 2013, 09:19 PM
BerryPick6 BerryPick6 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Jerusalem, Israel
Posts: 352
Send a message via MSN to BerryPick6
Quote:
Originally Posted by mowque View Post
This thread does not bring out the best in people.
These kinds of threads never do.
  #16  
Old July 17th, 2013, 09:21 PM
stefanbl stefanbl is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: County Durham
Posts: 1000 or more
Send a message via Skype™ to stefanbl
Quote:
Originally Posted by colleen1227 View Post
Lenin first ,then Stalin continued the death and enslavement of millions before the war. And Stalin continued to kill his own people even when fighting a war. The mass starvation of the Ukraine in the 30's equaled Hitler's death camps totals and that was just one nationality Stalin persecuted.So Stalin was much more the devil than Hitler but he was the left's devil so he could be excused his crimes.
I'm sure its the left's love of Stalin and not the whole world war thing.
  #17  
Old July 17th, 2013, 09:25 PM
mowque mowque is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1000 or more
Send a message via MSN to mowque
Quote:
Originally Posted by BerryPick6 View Post
These kinds of threads never do.
Quote:
Originally Posted by stefanbl View Post
I'm sure its the left's love of Stalin and not the whole world war thing.
See, this thread even attracts Chat posters~
  #18  
Old July 17th, 2013, 09:25 PM
BerryPick6 BerryPick6 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Jerusalem, Israel
Posts: 352
Send a message via MSN to BerryPick6
Quote:
Originally Posted by mowque View Post
See, this thread even attracts Chat posters~
Nah, that was the Goldman sig
  #19  
Old July 17th, 2013, 10:21 PM
Bob in Pittsburgh Bob in Pittsburgh is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 219
After the Gulf War Prince Klahid said “If there has to be a superpower thank Allah that it is the United States.” Obviously if either Stalin or Hitler emerged heading the only superpower the world would have been a very different place; to put it mildly. Ultimately I vote for Hitler because he was the more unstable of the two. Stalin placed a greater emphasis on survival and I think he would have stopped the war sooner. Remember that many of the Soviet communists really believed that there economic system would eventually supplant capitalism and they would have expected that to happen. Hitler on the other hand seems to have been even more of megalomaniac and fought for the shear joy of fighting.
  #20  
Old July 17th, 2013, 10:22 PM
user23123 user23123 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 436
Stalin gets my vote for :
He get away with murder in some way,Hitler lost the war
He seems like the more calculated one of the tow,Will Hitler was driven by hate,Stalin seams more cold blooded.
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.