I've been reading 1493 recently, and one interesting thing I discovered, which I didn't know before, is much of Southeast England was malarial between the 16th and 19th centuries.
Basically when they drained the tidal regions of England at the beginning of this period, they left behind stagnant, brackish pools which mosquito absolutely loved. The slightly less deadly, more cold-tolerant version of Malaria quickly took root. The region had a higher death rate than birth rate for centuries, until in the Victorian era they finally drained the marshes properly.
The variant of Malaria which was endemic was one to which 97% of Africans are immune to. This is different from the malaria species in Africa, which is what the sickle-cell mutation imperfectly protects against.
Regardless, it's pretty clear that if Africans were brought into rural Southeastern England, unlike the white population, they would be completely resistant. Even if they initially came in small numbers the number of children surviving to adulthood could be far, far higher, meaning over time African-descended people would proliferate in the bottom lands.
A possible complication is Vitamin D deficiency, which causes rickets. Rickets was already a problem in England, and given their much darker skin, Africans would be disproportionately likely to suffer from rickets provided they had the same diet as whites in the same area, and didn't spend more time outdoors. However, this alone probably isn't enough to make them unfit, given the huge death rate malaria caused.
Regardless, is there some plausible POD to get Africans into Southeast England in large numbers? I don't think chattel slavery would go over big there, but all you'd need was someone to import a small population (slave or free) notice how well they did compared to natives, and then the ball would get rolling, similar to what happened in Virginia, when it was noted Africans were much less liable to die than indentured servants from Scotland.
Basically when they drained the tidal regions of England at the beginning of this period, they left behind stagnant, brackish pools which mosquito absolutely loved. The slightly less deadly, more cold-tolerant version of Malaria quickly took root. The region had a higher death rate than birth rate for centuries, until in the Victorian era they finally drained the marshes properly.
The variant of Malaria which was endemic was one to which 97% of Africans are immune to. This is different from the malaria species in Africa, which is what the sickle-cell mutation imperfectly protects against.
Regardless, it's pretty clear that if Africans were brought into rural Southeastern England, unlike the white population, they would be completely resistant. Even if they initially came in small numbers the number of children surviving to adulthood could be far, far higher, meaning over time African-descended people would proliferate in the bottom lands.
A possible complication is Vitamin D deficiency, which causes rickets. Rickets was already a problem in England, and given their much darker skin, Africans would be disproportionately likely to suffer from rickets provided they had the same diet as whites in the same area, and didn't spend more time outdoors. However, this alone probably isn't enough to make them unfit, given the huge death rate malaria caused.
Regardless, is there some plausible POD to get Africans into Southeast England in large numbers? I don't think chattel slavery would go over big there, but all you'd need was someone to import a small population (slave or free) notice how well they did compared to natives, and then the ball would get rolling, similar to what happened in Virginia, when it was noted Africans were much less liable to die than indentured servants from Scotland.