The NEW Our TimeLine Maps Thread!

[Qazaq2007]

Kewl, glad I was able to help, K-T.

[euio]

Originally Posted by Valdemar II

Europe before the reformation

ligth yellow is church states

Very Nice!

Weren't the Netherlands part of Spain by then?

[Qazaq2007]

Euio,
Yes, the Netherlands, as well as Franche-Comte were part of the Spanish branch of the house of Habsburg at the time of Valdemar's map. Q

[Knight Templar]

world 1650
EDIT:fixed crimea
EDIT: fixed crimea again

[euio]

Originally Posted by Knight Templar

world 1650

Crimea should be shown as a Khanate, not an independent state.

[Hapsburg]

By that time, it was nowhere near being subordinate to the Mongol Khagan. The Khan of Crimea was an autonomous lord, whose nation was subject to the Ottoman Turk empire. The Crimean Khanate was no longer "Mongol" by that point.
Besides, the title of "Khan" does not necessarily indicate a subjectivity to a Mongolian great-khan. "Khan" was a fairly common title for a high-ranking lord, equivalent king or duke, in many Altaic, especially Turkic, languages.

[Knight Templar]

World 1658

[Knight Templar]

world 1770

[Knight Templar]

world 1776

[euio]

Originally Posted by Knight Templar

world 1776

I really do not think the US controlled the entire coast in 1776. Wasn't New York British controlled then?

[Knight Templar]

Originally Posted by euio

I really do not think the US controlled the entire coast in 1776. Wasn't New York British controlled then?

Until we don't know for sure we let it be like this

[Knight Templar]

world 1793

[Knight Templar]

world 1807

[Knight Templar]

I almost forgot world 1920

[euio]

Originally Posted by Knight Templar

I almost forgot world 1920

What happened to Poland?

[euio]

Originally Posted by Knight Templar

world 1807

Whay does France have Hanover? Shouldn't that be part of the Kingdom of Westphalia?

[Thande]

Originally Posted by euio

Whay does France have Hanover? Shouldn't that be part of the Kingdom of Westphalia?

Nope, Hanover was directly annexed by Napoleon to France out of spite...

[Hapsburg]

Originally Posted by euio

I really do not think the US controlled the entire coast in 1776. Wasn't New York British controlled then?

In late 1776, yeah. Same goes for a lot of other regions along the colonial coast.
But, I'm making the assumption that his map takes place on July 4, 1776, for obvious reasons. At that time, the coast was held by Patriot forces.

[euio]

Originally Posted by Hapsburg

In late 1776, yeah. Same goes for a lot of other regions along the colonial coast.
But, I'm making the assumption that his map takes place on July 4, 1776, for obvious reasons. At that time, the coast was held by Patriot forces.

The entire coast?
I looked for areas controlled by both sides in 1776, but I couldn't find anything about the South. So all of the coast was controlled by the US?

[Hapsburg]

I think so. At least in the early stages. The British initial response was slow, so the Pats had time to capture the towns cities along the way.
Major cities were basically theirs, because they had seceded when they sent delegates to sign the Declaration of Independence. The inland was still decisively British-held, though, except in certain areas in the north-east.

Of course, soon after the DoI, the British struck back hard. It all depends on what time the map takes place. During that war, a lot changed in the spans of a year, or even the span of a month.