Lands of the North: The Federation of Nordic States

Devvy

Donor
Going on from the thread I started about a united Scandinavia, here's my attempt at a TL regarding the eventual unification of the Nordic nations.

Rather then start in 1917 (PoD), and work forward through history, I'll be doing this TL as a "long trip" (in the ATL current day of 2012) around all the cities in the Nordic Federation, covering a bit about the city & relevant history, and a different topic about the combined country at each place (for those of you who have poked your head into my 12:08 timeline about British Rail, this is basically a "Spotlight on:" from each city), starting from my adopted second home of Reykjavik.

The list of cities are:
Reykjavik
Akureyri
Trondheim
Lillehammer
Kristiania
Stavanger
Aarhus
Fredericia
Odense
Copenhagen
Helsingborg
Malmo
Gothenburg
Norkoping
Stockholm
Lulea
Oulu
Rovaniemi
Tampere
Turku
Helsinki
Viipuri
Tallinn
Tartu

You should be able to spot some butterflies in there already! Should have the first section from Reykjavik up a little later this evening.
 

Devvy

Donor
Landing at Keflavik Airport, Iceland. Transfer to Reykjavik via monorail.

airplane.jpg

Landing at Leifur Eiriksson Terminal, Keflavik Airport

The 20th century history of Iceland is fairly uncomplicated. A Danish territory at the outset of the century, by 1904 Home Rule had been expanded a few times by the Danish Government, allowing Iceland a significant amount of autonomous government under it's own Constitution. By 1918, the Home Rule had been even further expanded into an independent sovereign state, in personal union with Denmark as the "Kingdom of Iceland". Emerging into independence after hundreds of years of domination by Norwegian and later Danish interests made independence a slow migration, so from 1918, the new Kingdom of Iceland asked Denmark to represent Iceland in foreign affairs and take responsibility for Iceland's defence.

These affairs would come to an end though in 1943. The clamour for independence in Iceland ended in referendums which gave almost complete backing to the complete independence of Iceland and the enactment of a republican constitution (and so ending the personal union with Denmark). Denmark, which was in a difficult situation with Nazi Germany next door protested the poor timing, but Christian X, King of Denmark (and soon to be ousted King of Iceland) travelled to Iceland. His speech, delivered in full to the Althing (Parliament of Iceland), was widely praised as diplomatic, respecting the will of the people and wishing the Icelanders well for the future - something that would foster a close relationship between Iceland and Denmark in years to come. His last act as King of Iceland, at the end of his trip, was to watch the lowering the Royal Standard of the King of Iceland and later leave Iceland upon his personal ship. The Republic of Iceland came into being later that month, with Sveinn Bjornsson becoming the first President of Iceland - in effect carrying on his duties he conducted as the Governor of Iceland under Christian X.

althingi.jpg

Alþingishúsið (Parliament House) in Reykjavik, where Christian X gave his speech to the Icelandic Parliament

The independence of Iceland had been successfully managed, even in difficult circumstances. In 1940, with World War 2 raging on in Europe, the British and American forces occupied Iceland. The invasion was conducted against a backdrop of increasingly severe submarine warfare in the Atlantic Ocean, with Nazi Germany attempting to cut the UK off from it's supply chain in the USA, with the British increasingly worried about a German occupation of Iceland in order to expand their submarine operations. Although the linked state of Iceland and Denmark (and Sweden by extension) made German activity unlikely in Iceland, Britain was in no mood to rely on chance. The occupation was later passed on to the Americans as Britain needed her troops elsewhere (with the Americans building the later important airfield at Keflavik).

reyk.jpg

Downtown Reykjavik

After the end of World War 2, Iceland joined NATO in 1949 - something that was extremely controversial at the time. Many felt that Iceland had no need to join NATO, as it was at little risk of being invaded, and others felt that closer ties should instead be established with the other Nordic countries who had created the Nordic Defence Alliance. The Icelandic Government, however, felt that closer ties should be established with western Europe in the aftermath of independence instead. The US would base up to 40,000 troops in Iceland - outnumbering the civilian male population at the time which would lead to further strains in the relationship.

By the 1970s, the civilian dislike for the US base at Keflavik had reached larger levels, however with the US in the middle of the Cold War struggle with the Soviet Union, the US staunchly refused to even rediscuss the agreement allowing the US base in Iceland. The situation would only completely resolve itself in 2004 with the complete withdrawal of US forces from Iceland, handing over control to the Icelandic state Goverment. The Nordic Alliance Air Force, planned to take over operations at Keflavik, but the perceived anti-military nature in Reykjavik, combined with the civilian need for a larger airport then that available at Reykjavik meant that the NAAF remained based at Akureyri.

flag.jpg

The flag of the Federation of Nordic States

In 1970, Iceland also voted to join Nordek, the growing single market economy within the larger Nordic countries. The decision, and confirmed by a referendum forced by the President of Iceland, was tightly fought, with the referendum won by a 67%/33% for in the end - a much larger margin then was expected. Only a year later, Iceland built upon that, by agreeing to enter into a federation with Norway, Denmark, Sweden & Finland (colloquially known as "Norðurlöndin", or "Northern Lands" in Iceland), but this time as an equal to those nations rather then a possession. The limited areas of power granted to the new federal Government, and the distant and isolated nature of Iceland meant that in effect Iceland would continue to be highly autonomous within the new "Federation of Nordic States", which was a major selling point to the Icelandic population, who had only known full independence for just short of 30 years.

The referendum ending Icelandic sovereignty, and accession to the Federation was much closer then before, this time resulting in a 57%/43% split. Nevertheless, the result enabled the Icelanders to shed responsibility for any defence or foreign relations and focus it's small tax base upon a more productive remit it was said. With those matters handled by a combined Nordic Parliament, rather then Denmark alone, Iceland could be more comfortable with it's relations handled from abroad. Decades on, the decisions taken look to of brought new riches to Iceland, and the debate is non-question.

Depart for Akureyri via car, on Highway 1.
 
Last edited:

Devvy

Donor
Arriving via road from Reykjavik.

centre.jpg

Akureyri centre

Akureyri, affectionately known as "The Capital of the North", is the second largest city in Iceland, and situated in the far north of the country. Linked to the rest of Iceland via the "Route 1" ring road that runs round Iceland (finished in 1973), the city excels in the fish industry, as well as having a small but important economy based around the Nordic Alliance Air Force base.

The NAAF base provides a source of employment for many of the locals, and is also an important source of revenue from the Nordic Government for such an outlying settlement. The NAAF is the most tightly integrated component of the Nordic Alliance forces, but this is more by mistake then by design. The Swedish Air Force, historically the largest air force in the Nordics, continues to single handedly form the backbone of the NAAF. Due to the small size of Iceland, and the nature of the Nordic Alliance military, it is the Swedish Air Force which took on duties in Iceland, and based their Icelandic operations in Akureyri.

airport.jpg

A domestic flight at Akureyri in winter. Military and civilian operations share the same site

Although Sweden had always been the largest partner in any analysis of the Nordic nations, it was disproportionally the largest spender on it's air force (the Flygvapnet). Motivated mostly by their historical foe across the Baltic Sea, Russia, the threat took on a new face when Russia morphed into the Soviet Union, and retook the Baltic States. The Soviet Union had designs on Finland as well, as a former component of the Russian Empire, and it was the first truly pan-Nordic defence effort that eventually managed to secure Finland against Soviet aggression and cement Finland's place within the Nordic sphere.

Entering into the 1950s, the Swedish Air Force played a large game of catch up with other air forces, and eventually started work on the Saab 29 domestic fighter jet. Suddenly Sweden matched other foreign air forces, and principally the Soviet Union's. Successive Swedish Governments had realised that the best defence Sweden had against the Soviet Union was a defence based upon not letting the Soviets gain an inch of territory in the first place, and thus significant efforts were made on a pan-Nordic scale to spread the newly modernised air force around Sweden and Finland. The air force was also able to benefit significantly from funds initially meant for the Swedish nuclear weapons project - something ultimately cancelled as too risky for a neutral country unable to call upon a wider alliance as per the western European countries within NATO. Best effort's were placed upon being able to conduct an effective conventional military defence against invaders, and not make themselves a nuclear target - something that has worked well in hindsight. The only "live" operations, post World War 2, have been fighter scrambles, against Soviet jets.

saab29.jpg

The Saab 29 jet

These days, Sweden continues to be an aerial powerhouse, both in manufacturing and operation, and thus Swedish jets can be seen all over the country. The JAS39 Gripen takes on most roles required of air force - it's lack of overseas interests outside of the Nordics means that foreign ventures are rare. A recent development in 2009 was the permission for Icelandic nationals to enlist in the Swedish Air Force as equals to Swedes. Of the Icelanders who sign up for the Swedish Air Force, the majority spend at least some time based as Akureyri, and as the base uses local civilians for many administration roles, the amount of Swedes on the base is actually lower then many would think.

Depart by plane for Keflavik Airport, onwards flight to Trondheim

-----------
Notes: Something I forgot to do for the first part, so this is kind of a write up for both. Especially as this one if a bit shorter - my interests lie more in civil stuff then military! So the NAAF is formed in most part by the Swedish Air Force, with the general "Nordic Alliance" being a NATO style integration of the different Nordic military forces. Each state funds and ultimately rules it's own military, but operationally they form the Nordic Alliance forces. Continuing integration means the likelihood of a federal takeover of the defence portfolio.

The eagle eyed and Iceland-travelled people may note the direct Akureyri-Keflavik flight here. Reykjavik airport was (and still is OTL) in the city centre and used for all domestic flights, whereas Keflavik airport is about 50km south west of Reykjavik and used for all international flights. In this TL, Reykjavik airport was closed in 2008 eventually, with all domestic flights moved to Keflavik, with a fixed rail link being built to link the airport and the city (something that occasionally comes up in Iceland).

All in all, not overly different to OTL, due to the not-completely integrated Nordic military forces. We'll be hitting the "mainland" now, and more of a look back at the first steps of the Federation - Nordek.
 

Devvy

Donor
Beautiful. I will subscribe!

Cool :)

This seems like a TL with great potential!

Just promise me you won't butterfly away Hugleikur Dagsson :D

Hmmm, the arts, something I hadn't considered writing about. I'm sure there's somewhere to fit something in! Iceland's not looking *too* different to OTL - it's history up to 1970ish is broadly similar to OTL, so I think Hugleikur will survive! Any feedback you (and anyone else) have will be gratefully received :)
 

Devvy

Donor
I've been somewhat concerned about the readability of this format, and while I intend to continue it, I'm first going to to a mini series of historical look backs at major events in the history of the FNS (commonly known as Scandinavia). First stop; World War 1. I'm interested to see opinions, and I'm not above making a few edits if needed! :)

------------------------------
World War 1 had a huge effect on Scandinavian history, despite the Nordic countries not being particularly involved in it. From a continental point of view, Denmark, Norway and Sweden managed to mostly ride out World War 1 with little involvement in the war. Sweden had a close relationship with Germany and traded heavily with the German Empire, much to the Western Allies' concern, but was not significant enough to really warrant enough attention. The biggest flashpoint however remained what has been termed "The Flensborg Affair" (Danish spelling), for which most of the back story was only discovered decades after the event itself.

In 1917 a group of six German soldiers, accidentally crossed into Denmark across the border, who were soon after confronted by Danish soldiers from afar. The Danes, seeing German troops in their territory who refused to stop as ordered, opened fire, suspecting the initial steps of an invasion considering what was happening elsewhere in the world. The Germans promptly returned fire, believing themselves to be in the right, and only protecting themselves from a Danish incursion. The exchange of fire rapidly produced casualties; 2 German troops killed and 1 injured, and 2 Danish soldiers injured.

Sensing their dwindling situation, the Germans retreated back towards their base, and quickly realised their mistake, making the later decision to attempt to cover up the situation as a cross-border accident to protect themselves - something that appears to have ironically worked for them, as by chance the four survivors all died later that week in a vehicle crash.

However, British intelligence quickly learned of the incident, and with the dire war situation the UK was looking for any help it could garner. A plot to attempt to implicate German aggression was swiftly hatched, and within days drawings of Danish border defences along with a planned route for reconnaissance were laid in mud near the route of retreat the Germans used. When later discovered by Danish farmer a week later, the counterfeits quickly made their way through the Danish military, and led to heavy accusations that the Germans were plotting to invade Denmark, or at least the Jutland peninsula at best. The fact that the plans were made and laid by the British was a secret right up until the 1990s when archived files came to light, and led to a slight diplomatic spat between Scandinavia and the United Kingdom.

skandinavism.jpg

Scandinavian propaganda poster from the 19th century

The Germans denied all knowledge, as they did indeed have no knowledge of the plans, but this did nothing to lighten the Danish mood. Denmark immediately began fortifying it's border with Germany, and stationing more troops along it, and appealed to Sweden for help in the spirit of Scandinavian mutual co-operation and assistance that had prevailed over the previous decades (most notably in the just cancelled de facto Monetary Union at the time). Swedish interests however lay heavily with Germany, who was an important trading partner.

Swift German-Swedish diplomacy followed, with Sweden not wanting to needlessly alienate Denmark, but definitely not wanting to alienate Germany. German diplomats assured Sweden of there being no ill intent towards Denmark, although having discovered the truth about the original incursion remained open to some Swedish assistance to Denmark in an attempt to let things return to the status quo - German troops were too involved in France to reroute some to Schleswig. A Swedish-German compromise was worked out, where Sweden would assist Denmark in building some defence fortifications and placements, while assured that there would be no German action against it. In return, Denmark would stand side by side with Sweden in politically (but not militarily) aiding the Finnish gain independence.

As it later worked out, these initial Swedish-Danish actions would start a political ball rolling in terms of future co-operation.

In the eastern side of Scandinavia however, Finland and Estonia were much more heavily involved in the action. Both formed part of the Russian Empire, and as mentioned, the Swedish and the Danish helped significantly with diplomatic support and military training. Further help was not needed, as due to the German action against Russia, the new Soviet Government acquiesced to popular demand, and approved Finland and (later) Estonia independence. Both experience violent complications on their way to independence however.

In Finland, soon after the granting of independence, civil war broke out between white and red factions, with both sides well armed. The Finnish Civil War turned out to be one of the most traumatising moments in history for them, as several thousand Finns died in battle with each other, with tens of thousands later imprisoned and either being executed or dying from prison conditions. The White conservative faction won through in the end, aided substantially by both Germany and Sweden. Although Germany opposed Sweden interfering in what Germany saw as part of it's new sphere of influence (which it had agreed with the new Soviet Russia), Sweden took advantage of what it then suspected was a German mistake on the Danish border. Sweden had a vested interest in an independent Finland, partly as a friend to act as a buffer between Sweden and Russia, and partly as brothers as Finland had (until just over 100 years prior) been an integral part of Sweden.

With the victory of the white conservative movement in Finland, a Kingdom of Finland was established. Debate raged over 2 candidates to the new Finnish throne, with either one coming from the two "sponsors" of Finnish independence. The German candidate was Prince Frederick Charles of Hesse, the Swedish one Prince Carl, Duke of Västergötland who had been denied the Norwegian throne. The turn in fortunes for the German Empire however in 1918 led to the formal offering of the new Finnish Crown to Prince Carl of the Swedish Royal Family, re-establishing close Swedish-Finnish relations after 106 years. However, Prince Carl died from a brain haemorrhage shortly after arriving Helsinki after slipping while crossing the sea to Finland, and hitting his head, plunging Finland into a Succession Crisis. Prince Carl was never crowned King of Finland, although he is still legally recognised as the first King of Finland. His name has entered popular lexicon in the phrase: "Kallen tuuri" ("The luck of Carl!"), usually directed at the unfortunate person, due to Finnish popular belief that Carl missed out on three different Crowns; the Swedish one by being born the second son, the Norwegian one by his father's refusal, and the Finnish one by death.

Finland's whole movement for independence had originally been legally built upon the Swedish 1772 Instrument of Government, which mandated an agnatic primogeniture line of succession. However, Prince Carl's only son; Prince Carl, Duke of Östergötland, had only been born in 1911 and was thus only 7 years of age in December 1918. Finland needed strong leadership to heal the wounds of the Civil War and to take the young nation forward. Prince Carl (the younger) was the legal heir to the now deceased Prince Carl, and to change the line of succession would need a legal change to what in effect was Finland's most basic law or constitution. Changing the Royal Family or changing to a Presidency would reopen a huge public debate that had been closed.

finnishcrown.jpg

The new Finnish Crown

A month later, Prince Carl, Duke of Östergötland, was pronounced as the future King (Kaarle I, King of Finland and Karelia, Duke of Åland, Grand Duke of Lapland, Lord of Kaleva and the North), with the country under the rule of a Regent until the boy became of age. Pehr Evind Svinhufvud would act as the Finnish Regent until 1929 when Kaarle reached age.

In Estonia, a Civil War looked likely along similar lines to Finland, however the German Army stepped in. In the German conquest of Estonia, Red Soviet factions were forced to withdraw into Soviet Russia, allowing the white conservative movement to re-enact the Maapäev (Estonian Parliament) in public after it had been forced underground following the Bolshevik Jaan Arvelt's violent usurpation of power. After the Germans withdrew, the Estonians fought a 2 year long War of Independence against Russia; the resulting peace treaty (Treaty of Tartu) contained a Russian renunciation of all territorial rights or claims to Estonia. The Republic of Estonia was proclaimed, and quickly gained international recognition. Cultural, linguistic and historical links to Finland led to extremely close political links between Finland and Estonia in years to come.

1918 was also the year that Iceland was established as a Kingdom, in personal union with Denmark, marking a transition from a Danish possession to a nation in her own right. Iceland was now a sovereign nation, however continued to ask Denmark to represent Iceland in foreign affairs and defend Icelandic sovereignty.
 
Last edited:
Glad to see you will stick with the travelogue format, and I don't think we will mind a few textbook updates every now and then haha!

Or maps ;)

Keep up the good work
 
I have to say, that is one of the best stabs at creating a post-WWI Finnish monarchy I have yet seen. I especially like the idea of an extended Svinhufvud Regency.

It is still debatable if the royalist faction would even in those conditions have won over the republicans, but assuming the left has been thoroughly derailed for the time being and that the Swedish help for the Whites was quite significant, I think something like this might fly.

The one major stumbling block would be the attitude of the Anglo-French - how were they persuaded to accept the monarchy in Finland, as they were strongly against it IOTL? I think a crack Finno-Swedish delegation must have visited London and Paris to persuade the powers-that-be; Mannerheim might have had a hand in that.

For the twenties and the thirties, the problem with the monarchy would be that because it was forced on Finland by the White side against the wishes of the majority of the left, the mere existence of the monarchy will have a disrupting effect on Finnish internal politics. Many in the far (and even moderate) left will see it as a symbol of White oppression and dismiss its relevance automatically. The young King will have his work cut out for him to prove that he can unite the nation and that he will indeed be a "King of the People" rather than someone who acts as a vanguard to certain (reactionary) political interest groups - as was the intent of many among the Finnish conservatives during the OTL project for a monarchy: having a strong king to keep down the left and avoid future Red rebellions.

Devvy said:
His name has entered popular lexicon in the (translated) phrase: "You have as much luck as Carl"

That would be something like "Sinulla on yhtä huono tuuri kuin Kaarlella" or "Kaarlen tuuri" or possibly "Kallen tuuri" ("The luck of Carl") for short in Finnish. I could see the short version catching on.
 

Devvy

Donor
Cheers for the comments all! :)

The one major stumbling block would be the attitude of the Anglo-French - how were they persuaded to accept the monarchy in Finland, as they were strongly against it IOTL? I think a crack Finno-Swedish delegation must have visited London and Paris to persuade the powers-that-be; Mannerheim might have had a hand in that.

I'll freely admit my lack of detailed knowledge about the time. I'd see Mannerheim being a respected figure in Anglo-French camps, so maybe he could sooth things over. I thought initial Anglo-French dislike for a Finnish Monarchy was built on the fact that it was going to be a German Prince in OTL? At this point the Russian Civil War was just getting into full swing, would the Brits & French be interested in anything to weaken the Soviets?

For the twenties and the thirties, the problem with the monarchy would be that because it was forced on Finland by the White side against the wishes of the majority of the left, the mere existence of the monarchy will have a disrupting effect on Finnish internal politics. Many in the far (and even moderate) left will see it as a symbol of White oppression and dismiss its relevance automatically. The young King will have his work cut out for him to prove that he can unite the nation and that he will indeed be a "King of the People" rather than someone who acts as a vanguard to certain (reactionary) political interest groups - as was the intent of many among the Finnish conservatives during the OTL project for a monarchy: having a strong king to keep down the left and avoid future Red rebellions.

Well I guess for the 1920s, most of the decade will be spent with the country still in a Regency, and therefore the young King will be not in the public view quite as much. Come the 1930s, Kaarle will just need to try his damn best to soothe things over I guess. Although Swedish born, Kaarle will be as close as Finland can get to a Finnish monarch, having pretty much grown up in Finland. Come the Winter War (which I still see happening for reasons we'll get into later), the fact that he is originally a Swedish Prince will aid in pulling in strong Swedish assistance.

PS. Wikipedia has this little snippet on Mannerheim during the inter-war years:

Wikipedia said:
Mannerheim supported Finland's military industry and sought (in vain) to establish a military defence union with Sweden.

Anybody know any info on that - I can't find anything online about it?

That would be something like "Sinulla on yhtä huono tuuri kuin Kaarlella" or "Kaarlen tuuri" or possibly "Kallen tuuri" ("The luck of Carl") for short in Finnish. I could see the short version catching on.

Thanks for the correction (my Finnish is non-existent) - edited in the TL.
 
I'll freely admit my lack of detailed knowledge about the time. I'd see Mannerheim being a respected figure in Anglo-French camps, so maybe he could sooth things over. I thought initial Anglo-French dislike for a Finnish Monarchy was built on the fact that it was going to be a German Prince in OTL? At this point the Russian Civil War was just getting into full swing, would the Brits & French be interested in anything to weaken the Soviets?

Sweden needs to make a big effect in regards to the Finnish hearts and minds already in 1917 ar at least during the Civil War to get its candidate accepted to the Finnish throne. A Swedish candidate must look like as good an option, or at least nearly so, than that of a (still at the time) mighty Germany - and the option must be established early on to make it win over the OTL choice of republic when the German option vanishes. But if the Swedish have helped the separatist Finns in noticeable ways and appeared to cooperate with the Germans in doing that, they run the risk of becoming victims of dialectic wartime thinking and being considered de facto German allies by the Anglo-French. Finland still is a part of Russia to most concerned parties at this point, and anything that weakens the Russians is a risk to the Allied war effort.

I would imagine it would take some diplomatic efforts by both the Swedish and the Finns to convince London and Paris that they are not working in cahoots with the Kaiser but in fact against the vanguard of World Revolution. It will take, IMHO, well into 1918 before the British and the French consider the Swedish help to (or meddling in) Finland just or even mainly in terms of fighting the Bolshevik menace.

You are right in that the main objection was the German prince, and I believe that with a Swedish prince on the throne the Finnish royalists would get a lot closer than IOTL to gain acceptance to their scheme from the British and the French (and thus their official recognition to Finnish independence) - assuming Sweden can distance itself from Germany politically.


PS. Wikipedia has this little snippet on Mannerheim during the inter-war years:

Anybody know any info on that - I can't find anything online about it?

I believe that references the Finnish effort to create a defensive union with the Swedish in 1940, after the Winter War. It was a measure of desperation, really, and shot down by German and Soviet hostility. Despite that some might argue that a truly neutral, united North would have been a boon to both Hitler and Stalin during WWII...

Mannerheim, however, could make a decent proponent of Nordic cooperation in the interwar period, and especially in the context you have outlined. He was an aristocrat and a monarchist, but his anti-German views made him oppose the OTL plans for a kingdom. I believe he might well approve the plan for a Swedish king, especially if that seems to further his plans of making an intervention into the Russian Civil War on the White side. In the 20s and 30s he was also quite acutally aware of the limitations of the Finnish defence resources and would naturally support common defence schemes with the Scandinavian nations.


Thanks for the correction (my Finnish is non-existent) - edited in the TL.

You're welcome.
 

Devvy

Donor
Sweden needs to make a big effect in regards to the Finnish hearts and minds already in 1917 ar at least during the Civil War to get its candidate accepted to the Finnish throne. A Swedish candidate must look like as good an option, or at least nearly so, than that of a (still at the time) mighty Germany - and the option must be established early on to make it win over the OTL choice of republic when the German option vanishes. But if the Swedish have helped the separatist Finns in noticeable ways and appeared to cooperate with the Germans in doing that, they run the risk of becoming victims of dialectic wartime thinking and being considered de facto German allies by the Anglo-French. Finland still is a part of Russia to most concerned parties at this point, and anything that weakens the Russians is a risk to the Allied war effort.

Noted...it's a touchy subject to say the least. My thoughts were that both candidates were proposed, but as Germany's hopes in WW1 rapidly dissipate in 1918, then the Swedish option takes clear precedence and then wins the vote.

I would imagine it would take some diplomatic efforts by both the Swedish and the Finns to convince London and Paris that they are not working in cahoots with the Kaiser but in fact against the vanguard of World Revolution. It will take, IMHO, well into 1918 before the British and the French consider the Swedish help to (or meddling in) Finland just or even mainly in terms of fighting the Bolshevik menace.

You are right in that the main objection was the German prince, and I believe that with a Swedish prince on the throne the Finnish royalists would get a lot closer than IOTL to gain acceptance to their scheme from the British and the French (and thus their official recognition to Finnish independence) - assuming Sweden can distance itself from Germany politically.

As you say, it all comes down to how tight the Swedish-German relations are. On the Danish side, Sweden has helped Denmark to "defend" against further German "aggression", which isn't exactly too buddy-buddy on the face of it, but actions in Finland now.....well I'll just leave it to say that Mannerheim has managed to sooth things over on Finnish independence. Given the morph into Soviet Russia that is happening in Russia, the UK/France/USA I'd imagine would be perfectly happy in hindsight for Sweden to have helped Finland out of Russia and formed a democratic nation.

[I believe that references the Finnish effort to create a defensive union with the Swedish in 1940, after the Winter War. It was a measure of desperation, really, and shot down by German and Soviet hostility. Despite that some might argue that a truly neutral, united North would have been a boon to both Hitler and Stalin during WWII...

Ah that'll be why I couldn't find anything about this. I'd assumed it was in the years after WW1, not the one I already have documented :)

Mannerheim, however, could make a decent proponent of Nordic cooperation in the interwar period, and especially in the context you have outlined. He was an aristocrat and a monarchist, but his anti-German views made him oppose the OTL plans for a kingdom. I believe he might well approve the plan for a Swedish king, especially if that seems to further his plans of making an intervention into the Russian Civil War on the White side. In the 20s and 30s he was also quite actually aware of the limitations of the Finnish defence resources and would naturally support common defence schemes with the Scandinavian nations.

I also think Mannerheim is the crux for Finnish Nordic leanings. As you say, he's a Monarchist, he's anti-German, he fully embraces his Finnish culture, he's from a Swedish Finnish family etc etc etc.
 

Devvy

Donor
Arriving into Kristiania Hobøl Airport. Transit to Kristiania by train.

oldmap.jpg

A 1903 map of Kristiania

Kristiania is the capital of Norway, and has had many turns of face over the years. It received the name "Christiania" back in 1624, before respelt as "Kristiania" in line with spelling reforms of the time, and as served as the Norwegian capital for centuries. The old town in the middle of the city still bears the name of "Oslo", the original name for the city, and in 1925 there were city ordinances to change the name back to "Oslo", but popular demand forced the city council to back down and rescind the plan. As by far the biggest city in Norway, it's been by far the focal point for sports in Norway, and the home of most Norwegian sports teams.

Sports in Scandinavia have taken many turns in fate. Following the establishment of the Federation of Nordic States in 1974, sports stayed a part of the state's remit, with each state participating individually. Fortunes were mixed, with the richer countries Sweden and Finland (with larger populations) managing some limited successes, and the smaller states managing little. The 1976 Montreal Olympics saw Finland and Sweden both achieve 4 Gold medals, but with the other states managing little, but such successes fizzled out in the 1980s. The 1988 Seoul Olympics saw Norway and Denmark do the best in the Nordics, each winning 2 Gold medals.

olympics.jpg

Gothenburg 1992 Olympics logo

By 1980s though, Scandinavia had decided to bid for the right to hold the 1992 Summer Olympics, bidding against heavyweights such as Spain, France and the United Kingdom. In the end, in 1986, the FNS won the right to hold the Olympics, much to the delight of the citizens. The Olympic Stadium would be built in Gothenburg, the capital with action also taking place in Oslo, Stockholm and Copenhagen (mainly Olympic football matches). To accompany this, and give the whole nation the best chance, the decision was made to pool the Olympic budgets and create a new unified "Team Nordic" to compete in the Olympics.

In total, "Team Nordic" managed to win 7 Gold medals at their home Olympics, placing them 10th in the overall medal table - far better then any of them had done individually. Suddenly, Scandinavia was a middleweight in Olympic sports, a recognised name. The pooling of resources, and the free nature of the Olympics to take as many athletes as you could afford meant that this "act of union" was little opposed, although a domestic "state" handball championship was created on the even years to allow a domestic competition along the former national lines (with handball being a highly competitive Olympic sport unlike football).

ullevaal.jpg

Ullevaal Stadium in Kristiania, one of host stadiums for the UEFA Euro '96

However, football was a different matter. All the Nordic countries had their own domestic leagues, national teams with varying levels of success. Added to this was the limiting factory of a fixed team size, unlike the Olympics. The Nordic "Decade of Sport" as the 1990s were becoming known continued with the hosting of the UEFA Euro 1996 with a combined Denmark/Sweden bid due to the enlarged format of 16 teams. The tournament ended poorly for the home sides however with both teams being eliminated during the first round league stage after poor performances. Many advocated an Olympic approach to the national team - but this remained unagreeable for the states. A year later though, an agreement was reached creating a mostly unified "Nordic Premier League". Iceland and the Danish realms of Greenland and the Faroe Islands remained outside of the NPL due to distance reasons, although Iceland would later join the NPL in 2003. It was hoped that creating a league across the Nordic states would allow the best teams to play each other, raising the standard of football played and thereby raise the quality of players.

All this has been made possible though by the large steps taken by the Nordic countries to integrate in the decades after World War 2, particularly in the area of transportation to bind the countries together. In 1946, when Svensk Interkontinental Lufttrafik (SE), Det Danske Luftfartselskab (DK), Det Norske Luftfartselskap (NO) and Aerotransport (SE) all merged to create "Scandinavian Airlines". This involved the merging of all 3 flag carriers from Denmark, Sweden & Norway, and created a large mutually owned airline to serve all 3 countries. It quickly swallowed up local airlines or opened new routes up, and quickly dominated domestic routes in continental Scandinavia. Icelandair and Finnair were also invited to join the group, but both declined; both Finland and Iceland were located well outside the continental Scandinavian area and felt they needed their own domestic carrier to safeguard their own interests, a situation that remains to this day although Finnair also acts as the principal carrier in Estonia now as well.

sas.jpg

The Scandinavian Airlines System logo

Much of the early years of the FNS revolved around establishing the necessary infrastructure to allow the formerly separate countries to work together as one unified country. Oslo Airport was a prime example of this; the former airport at Fornebu ended up being not large enough in the 1960 for newer intercontinental aircraft. The search for a new airport to serve Oslo began, and several prime candidates stood out at Gardermoen, Hobøl and Mjøsa. Hobøl had the neccessary room for a large 3 runway airport, and importantly for the federal authorities was on the direct route from Oslo to the new capital at Gothenburg. The federal authorities offered to make a substantial contribution to a new airport at Hobøl, including necessary rail links. Such a large airport, serving the entire Oslo area would offer a large sized airport that could also (remotely) serve Gothenburg would be a large benefit and also help justify the outlay for a new airport.

fornebu.jpg

Oslo Fornebu Airport

This would all act to aid mobility around the young nation, importantly aided by the FNS inheritance of the Nordic Passport Union. The NPU was originally a treaty between Iceland, Norway, Denmark, Sweden & Finland, signed in 1952, but when the nations federalised together the new Federal Government took over responsibility for the free movement of people. Originally, the NPU granted any Nordic citizen (of the afore mentioned signatories) to travel to, work, live in any other Nordic country completely visa-free, with simplified arrangements for necessary paperwork and administration in the other countries. All air transport (or cross boundary travel) around the FNS would only a form of photographic ID, which could be a passport, official ID card, or even as little as a Nordic driving license. Later steps would remove the ID checks completely on the land borders.

The Passport Union would eventually evolve into a completely single travel zone as per the current day, with the Federal Government taking over sovereignty for all migration & travel powers. It can easily be considered to be the early forerunner, and prototype, of some of the European integration efforts to occur in the later decades of the 20th century.

Depart via Norwegian Trains (NSB) overnight service to Stavanger

-----------------------
Notes:
So a few little topics here. Note that "Kristiania" is still the name of the Norwegian capital, and "Oslo" only refers to the old city in Kristiania - essentially the situation pre-1925 when the whole city was renamed "Oslo". Also note that Kristiania/Oslo's main airport here is Hobøl - a location that was the original intended site for a new Oslo airport in OTL, but lost out in the end. Here, it became the site for Kristiania's (damn that's harder to type then Oslo....) new airport, as the Nordic Government offered to part-subsidise the construction if built at Hobøl so that it could also serve as a remote airport for Gothenburg one day (as Gothenburg would be expected to remain somewhat smaller then Oslo, if examples such as Canberra or Ottawa are to be followed).

Secondly, as noted, the Olympic teams have linked up to achieve greater successes, which leads to a UK-style situation where you have a "Team Nordic" to compete in the Olympics, but individual nations (ie. Sweden, Norway etc etc) competing in the primary sport competitions (ie. FIFA World Cup, UEFA Euro Cup), so the Nordics don't compete in those sports at the Olympics. A little shout out to handball as well as an incredibly popular Nordic (and generally popular in Europe apart from the UK & Ireland) sport. Sadly my homestead of England didn't host Euro'96 in this TL... :(

Lastly, is the mention about air transport. SAS has come about roughly as per OTL, although the Passport Union has come about a little bit earlier then OTL, which is due to the closer relationship between the countries. In later years, Estonia's efforts to join the FNS and integrate as fully into Scandinavia to aid it's application, Finnair started serving Estonia, and acting as an Estonian principal (almost flag!) carrier. I'd imagine the same happening with VR Group (rail transport), although being a bit of a train nerd, I'll cover rail transport in another chapter.
 
Last edited:

Devvy

Donor
Arriving into Stavanger by train from Kristiania (NSB)

stavanger.jpg

The town of Stavanger, with the port clearly visible

Stavanger is one of the most western cities in Norway, and in continental Scandinavia, and is only just pipped to the title by Bergen. Stavanger is an important shipping city in the FNS, an important location for the pan-Nordic shipping company AMS (Aker-Maersk Shipping) as well as the location of a significant naval base. The Nordic Allied Navy is one of the more equal partnerships in the Federation of Nordic States, as each of the 4 major powers have a large military with each state contributing many corvettes, frigates and other ships to the overall navy. This means that a high level of deliberate integration is needed in the naval field, with many shared command and control centres.

Although nominally separate from each other, each of the state's navies (Danish, Swedish, Norwegian & Finnish) generally act together as a integrated unit, although each state generally protects it's own waters, with the Faroe Islands, Iceland & Greenland being a shared venture led by the Danish Navy and Estonia working closely with the Finnish and Swedish Navies. The Norwegian Navy looks after a large swathe of the Norwegian Sea and the Barents Sea, and even as far north as the Norwegian Svalbard Islands.

frigates.jpg

"KNM Fridtjof Nansen" and "KNM Helge Ingstad", in Oslo before heading out to the Norwegian Sea and Stavanger

While a united and co-funded attempt to build or purchase larger ships have been debated, the lack of much need for a large navy have hindered political efforts to gather support. Greenland and Iceland act as the most remote territories, and both are adequately defended using conventional airfields and naval ports. Greenland also is host to Thule Air Force Base from the US Air Force, due to Greenland's position adjacent to the North American continent.

More recent efforts have focussed on multi-national actions, such as anti-pirate patrols in the sea by Somalia, as well as claiming, holding and patrolling territory - particularly in the Arctic Ocean which is becoming a large point in international discussions, as well as integrating the nominally separate navies as far as possible - far surpassing the NATO integration that has occurred elsewhere. This had largely been born out of circumstances and events between 1939 and 1945 - when Europe was ravaged by the Second World War.

The biggest event to happen during this time period, was the Winter War with the Soviet Union attempting to invade Finland for claimed security reasons (disputed by later historians). Relations between the Soviet Union and Finland had generally been reasonable, although major sticking points had been found following the First World War and subsequent Finnish Civil War when the communists were mostly crushed as a power in Finnish politics. However, as nationalists managed to claim victory in their attempts to put a Monarchy in place in Finland, they had to make numerous concessions to the more central and left-centre political parties, namely the SDP and Agrarian League, both of whom would prove able to work in Parliament despite both parties strong Republican tendencies towards the Monarchy. Both party's leaders would be instrumental in later years of establishing ever closer ties with Sweden - particularly the SDP who had a very cosy relationship with the Swedish Social Democrat Party. Swedish volunteers actions in conjunction with White Finns in executing Red Finns would prove a sticking point, but as Finland reconciled with itself these problems were addressable.

lapuan.png

Emblem of the Laihia Movement

The Monarchy's position in Finland was later entrenched when King Kaarle (Kaarle II in official terms) played a large role in subduing the Seinajoki Rebellion. Nationalist factions led by the Laihia Movement, feeling outmanoeuvred by the more left leaning SDP and Agrarian Party and also feeling that Finland was selling out to Sweden, escalated into violence and later a rebellion. Finland-Sweden relations had grown solidly, as previously mentioned, but this had come partly at the cost (at least in some public eyes) Finnish culture, with the losing of Repola and Porajarvi during Finnish-Soviet negotiations, and a "Swedish" King on the throne. A rousing radio speech by the young Kaarle in fluent Finnish, advocating peace and calling for a "Rally for National Unity" in Helsinki undermined much of the nationalist support which was further eroded when the news of their covert violence spread. Kaarle was in Finland to stay, and would later marry a Finnish lady, cementing himself as the King of the Finns, but in doing so would place Finland as an anti-communist nation in Soviet eyes (cemented by communist civilians fleeing the rebellion violence into Russia).

Finland's relationship with the Soviet Union however was more rocky. It would grow from a rebellious province, gaining independence upon largely the borders of the former Grand Duchy, then to a mutual non-aggression pact. However, in the 1930s Stalin rose to power in the Soviet Union, and by 1938 was feeling uneasy about the location of the Soviet-Finnish border being so close to Leningrad which has never been an issue formerly due to Finland being a Russian Grand Duchy. A secret treaty between the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany had placed the Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia & Finland all within the Soviet sphere of influence (all former Russian Empire territories). Lithuania, Lativa and Estonia were later forced to allow Soviet bases on their territories, accelerating their demise into Soviet states. Finnish-Soviet relations took a hit during negotiations in 1938 - the Soviets demanded territory concessions on the Karelian Isthmus, moving the border significantly further away from Leningrad (formerly known as St Petersburg). The Finns refused, as a lot of their industrial capacity was based in the area, and was also an area close to the Finnish heart.

nego1.png

Initial offers and counter-offers over the boundary between the Soviet Union and Finland on the Karelian Isthmus

Later in November 1939, after negotiations completely broke down, there was an accidental shelling of a Soviet border post near Mainila - later found to be conducted by Soviet agents themselves. The Soviet Union took this as a casus beli, and later attempted to invade Finland after talks broke down following the shelling. Both sides had however already started mobilisation, and the invasions quickly hit problems. On the Karelian Isthmus, the Finns quickly retreated from the border to the fortified "Mannerheim Line" of defensive emplacements, which had been worked on over the last 2 decades. The lack of any kind of road in large areas of Central Finland hampered invasion there by Soviet armies,. Finland also immediately put out a call for help to the Swedish Government.

The Soviet invasion had been planned upon little or no Swedish involvement - it was thought in Soviet circles that Sweden would allow volunteers but limit official involvement to political and diplomatic support, something the Stalin cared little for. It proved to be an oversight - prevailing though in the Swedish Cabinet was that (similar to the Finnish Civil War) keeping the Russians away from Sweden was best accomplished through assisting Finland and therefore avoiding any direct Swedish-Soviet action. While Parliamentary opposition prevented the Swedish Army from being deployed on Finnish soil for fear of being involved against the Soviet Union (although advocated by the Swedish Army itself as the best form of defence for Sweden, primarily by Archibald Douglas of the Northern Army Corps), Sweden did allow large numbers of volunteers to cross into Finland again, and sold large amounts of munitions to Finland.

swedes.jpg

Swedish Volunteers in the Winter War

All over the country, Soviet forces were confounded by the far more mobile and better equipped Finns, who thrived by dividing and conquering the Soviet forces. Swedish munitions, including many anti-tank weapons such as the Bofors 37 mm AT gun were sold en masse - something Finland originally lacked. Much equipment was also captured from eliminated Soviet units. Soviet advances in Ladoga Karelia and Central Finland were both eliminated, leading to Soviet concentration on one front - that on the Karelian Isthmus, as well as their successful forces in Petsamo.

By the start of 1940. with the Soviets concentrating on taking the Karelian Isthmus, and the Finnish having proven themselves in the defence of their country over the winter months, the Swedish Government's opposition to involvement started to wane. By the end of January, the Swedish Parliament passed a resolution to further aid Finland, and military plans were further refined. From the Soviet point of view, it looked like Swedish action and a possible declaration of war was a distinct possibility. Considering the current results of the war, this was something to be avoided; significant Swedish action in tandem with the stubborn Finnish defence could deal a real blow to Soviet interests.

mannerheimline.png

The Soviet forces against the Finnish Mannerheim Line

By early mid 1940, the invasion was largely considered a failure, and was a disaster for the Soviet Union, who had lost roughly 150,000 troops and another 200,000 troops injured or wounded. Soviet newspapers were struggling to explain the poor performance of the Soviet Army, and Finnish-Soviet negotiations began eagerly between the two sides - the Finns due to a decline in the available artillery ammunition they had available on the Mannerheim Line which could make them later vulnerable (something unknown to the Soviets). The Finns wanted an end before their lines crumbled from war weariness, the Swedes wanted an end so they didn't have to get involved to protect both their own and Finnish interests, and the Soviets wanted an end before Sweden got involved and to what had been an exceptionally poor military performance.

While the Winter War had gone exceptionally well for Finland, there was a broad understanding within the Finnish cabinet that the war had been "won" as much by Finnish excellence as by Soviet under-performance - not a combination likely to happen a second time. Several face-saving gestures to the Soviet Union would be needed if another war was to be averted, and peace obtained before a Finnish collapse. The Moscow Peace Treaty in 1940 therefore allowed for the cessation of several areas on the Karelian Isthmus to the Soviet Union, significantly extending the distance from Leningrad to the boundary. Petsamo was also returned to the Soviet Union, who had wanted at least the Kalastajansaarento peninsula - the Finnish had found themselves entirely unable to defend the area anyhow. In return, Finland received Repola and Porajarvi - 2 areas much longed after by the Finnish populace. Several islands in the Gulf of Finland were also ceded to the Soviet Union.

mannline.jpg

Remains of Finnish fortifications on the Mannerheim Line

The very next year in 1941, the Soviet Union was invaded by Nazi Germany in an act called "Operation Barbarossa", and suddenly the Soviet spotlight was no longer on Finland. The Germans swept through Russia, and by September were besieging Leningrad. Although the Finnish view was that of a sweet irony - the biggest threat to Leningrad had come from the opposite side of the city rather then the Finnish side, the Government took a more cautious approach, allowing food supplies to be transferred (by the Finns themselves) through Finland to Leningrad, with the Soviets having to ship military supplies across Lake Ladoga - something that was risky for the crews involved. If the Finns refused to help, they risked being labelled as co-belligerents with Nazi Germany at best, and a pseudo-Axis power at worst.

In Denmark, the effects of the war had been much less. Remembering the incidents of German trespasses during the First World War, the Danish Army had the Danish-German border well secured to prevent any accidents, although the border would be little obstacle to a German blitzkrieg if they were attacked as the Danish well knew. Friendly politics where possible were conducted, and the Danes assisted in the shipments of Swedish iron ore where necessary. It was only after the Second World War, during the Nurumberg trials (and in part due to them) that details came out of a planned Nazi occupation of Denmark and Norway to tighten and secure shipments of Swedish iron ore to Germany, and avoid Allied interference. The planned invasion, named Operation Weserubung, was reportedly only held back due to the friendship and perceived de facto defensive alliance between Denmark, Norway & Sweden that the operation did not go ahead - the Germans feared a cut off of Swedish iron ore upon invading Denmark. It could take a significant amount of time to capture and secure the entire supply chain from the iron ore mines in northern Sweden, which would then be open to "terrorist" disruption.

All this served to create a large sense in Denmark that national security was best maintained in tandem with Sweden, and on a pan-Scandinavian basis, and this was further reinforced by the fact that the former Danish-German border was now a de facto Danish-Soviet border (in the form of the East Germany) after the Soviet occupation became the Warsaw Pact area. Just after the Second World War, in 1946, the unpopular Christian X of Denmark died and was replaced by his son. Frederick IX of Denmark came to power, reflecting the populace's growing pan-Scandinavian feelings with his wife of 14 years, the Swedish Princess Ingrid.

Departing by ferry to Aarhus

ferry.jpg

The ferry to Aarhus

Appendix:

nego3.jpg


The eventually agreed border between Finland and the Soviet Union, as evidenced in the Moscow Peace Treaty. The yellow area is the entire area that was debated over, with the purple line being the eventually mutually agreed new border, which shows Stalin's original "speculative at best" demands to end the war.

--------------------------
Notes: Plenty of text again! Firstly the Navies - as you can see again, the military forces of the FNS are still "state-based", although in a tightly integrated formation. After the downfall of the Soviet Union, there is little spur to push on to completely integrate the forces into one "Nordic" military.

Other events in Finland have cemented the place of the Finnish Monarchy - steel is forged from fire after all. I didn't cover too much of the history, I've got the rudiments of a piece on each of the Scandinavian monarchs to come at some point, especially as most of it pre 1940ish is pretty similar to OTL. Just the seeds are different, for a different post-WWII Scandinavia now.

Winter War has gone better for Finland (not that OTL was much of a failure!). Closer Swedish-Finnish relations have led to the OTL Swedish volunteers in the Winter War to start with, but also significant amounts of armaments - something Finland desperately lacked in the Winter War. I did toy with the Swedish Army getting involved earlier, but couldn't really find a decent way of doing it. Some smallish territory swaps at the end of the Winter War, Finland eventually gains it's long desired Repola and Porajarvi, but at the loss of Petsamo and bits of the Karelian Isthmus. It makes no sense to continually poke the Soviet bear, especially if you can drop terrain in compensation for something else rather then losing it for nothing through war.

In Denmark (& Norway), Operation Weserubung never occured, due to German fears of losing Swedish iron ore imports upon which it was dependant - and not being able to secure it enough by invading it along with Denmark & Norway. Germany doesn't want to push Scandinavia into the Allied sphere. Note the "unpopular Christian X of Denmark" - who is primarily remembered for his poor actions during the Easter Crisis of 1920 in Denmark. Despite the German accidental incursion into Denmark in WWI, I would still see Christian X's actions blighting the political chance to grab more of Schleswig, therefore the as-OTL Danish-German border is in existence. Although Schleswig-Holstein is part of East Germany due to the Soviet Union having more troops to push back against Germany with as there was no Continuation War (though I'd envisage Hamburg as remaining West Germany). This will cut Denmark off from the rest of Western Europe psychologically, and turn it towards pan-Nordicism more.

Plus I knocked this up at some point earlier this week. Figured I'd stick it in somewhere:

swedishpass.jpg


And last but not least - massive thanks to DrakonFin for substantial assistance with the Finnish writings here! :)
 
Last edited:

Devvy

Donor
Interesting update. So the Finns got Porajärvi, a pretty good deal, and not too wanky either. :D

Finns get Repola and Porajarvi. But they lose some prime ground on the Isthmus, Salmi & Petsamo. The Soviets have the better deal (as they have the better hand obviously!), but the Finns have kept the losses to a minimum on the Isthmus (and kept Viipuri), Ladoga Karelia and finally gained some long wanted areas.

However, with the rising Finnish-Swedish relations, don't expect Finland to tread as carefully as OTL with regards to the Soviets - they'll have the additional safety of a cosy Nordic relationship to back them up.
 
I'd love to see this crossed over with another great TL--Protect and Survive.

Seriously, though, this is a good timeline.
 
Top