Here's a thought: if he does comedies with lots of breaking-the-fourth-wall then no one will care about the mistakes etc he leaves in his films -- after all, it's all part of the show.
Yeah, but I was replying to jamsodonnell, not you.That's not what I meant though.
Yeah IIRC Orson Wells and Wood were going to do a Batman Movie in the sequel When You Wish Upon a Star but sadly their hasn't been an update in months.This was beginning in "A World of Laughter, A World of Tears".
All I can think of is someone giving him a bigger budget on one of his films.
That could do it. The plots of a lot of his movies weren't great but what really made them hideous was the horribly low budgets and obvious special effects failures and stock footage. With higher budgets could we we see Wood as a sort of '50s, '60s Michael Bay?
Only Wood wasn't as obsessed with explosions.
Which actress would Wood use for the fanservice roles Megan Fox tends to have in Bay's films?
That could do it. The plots of a lot of his movies weren't great but what really made them hideous was the horribly low budgets and obvious special effects failures and stock footage. With higher budgets could we we see Wood as a sort of '50s, '60s Michael Bay?
See, that wouldn't happen. Prior to the success of Star Wars, studios almost never poured large amounts of money into films with the plots of, well, B-movies. There were exceptions, of course, such as King Kong and Planet of the Apes, but that's what they were - exceptions. You'd need an epic genre movie (and nothing cerebral like 2001: A Space Odyssey) to become a massive success in order to change this mentality, and Ed Wood isn't the guy who's going to do it.