Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Discussion: After 1900

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 3rd, 2012, 11:30 PM
The Man From Nevada The Man From Nevada is offline
Dont Mess With Nevada....
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 111
July 20th, A Day Which Will Live in Victory

What if the July 20th assassination plot on Hitler was successful? Would Germany try for peace with just tge Western Allies and go all out on USSR? Or would Germany sign a full peace? What would happen?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by snowzinger View Post
They're not gods, ASB's are bigger than that. They are the people the gods answer to.
Tacos are delicious
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old October 3rd, 2012, 11:37 PM
jmc247 jmc247 is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Man From Nevada View Post
What if the July 20th assassination plot on Hitler was successful? Would Germany try for peace with just tge Western Allies and go all out on USSR? Or would Germany sign a full peace? What would happen?
The Western Allies wouldn't accept a seperate peace with Germany or even a offical surrender that was announced to be just to Western Allied forces.

The only thing they would accept at that point in 1944 would be battlefield surrenders in the West so that it doesn't look like they are screwing over Stalin while they are getting to central Europe far faster then OTL.

People need to remember that America and the British were at war with Germany and its people not just its government. They also believed Stalin was an honorable and trustworthy indivisual (at least the U.S. did) and even many in the British government were hoodwinked by him. A simple change in German government not backed up by massive military success on the part of Germany which wasn't possible at that point wouldn't alter any of those facts.

The failure of the July 20th Plot and Rommel being strafed by a plane three days before then meant that the hopes to end the war in 1944 and with the Western Allies having a much larger say in redrawing the lines of central Europe and deciding who gets what with the occupation zones went out the window.

Last edited by jmc247; October 4th, 2012 at 12:01 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old October 4th, 2012, 02:05 PM
Cook Cook is offline
Maybe I will
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Beyond the black stump
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Man From Nevada View Post
Would Germany try for peace with just tge Western Allies and go all out on USSR?

They undoubtedly would have tried to negotiate a peace with the western powers while continuing the war against the Soviet Union and equally undoubtedly their offer would have been rejected; the Big Three had already agreed (in Tehran, nearly a year before the bomb plot) on unconditional surrender, occupation and dismemberment of the Third Reich. Churchill in particular believed that the Prussian Junkerism needed to be permanently purged from the German psyche and had agreed with Stalin that East Prussia, the birthplace of Junkerism, would be divided between Poland and Russia. The discussions concerning East Prussia actually took place in late 1941, when the Germans were approaching the outskirts of Moscow, which just goes to show that Stalin for one was planning several moves ahead.

The bomb plot would definitely have shortened the war; the confusion and dislocation caused by the coup and probably a civil war between the army on one side and the Nazi party apparatus and SS on the other, would have been devastating to the war effort and with the collapse of the central authority various commanders would have probably opted to surrender unilaterally, Kesselring and Wolff in Italy for example. But the Junta, assuming they actually managed to seize power in Berlin, which given the incompetence with which they carried out their assassination attempt is a real stretch, would have been terribly disappointed to discover that no-one outside of Germany had the least interest in ending the war with Germany undefeated and unoccupied.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Georgepatton View Post
Operation Seacamel?!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emperor Julian View Post
Berlusconi for Pope: Why let the Church's collapse be slow?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyr View Post
a fairly realistic take on a zombie apocolypse
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old October 4th, 2012, 03:44 PM
Noravea Noravea is online now
Orwell of Future History
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 1000 or more
I could see, depending on who takes over Germany, a sneaky way to get past the W. Allies not accepting a peace, and still screw Stalin in the end. Germany gives up on the Western Front, and knowing the war is lost, allocate resources to the Eastern Front and allow the Allies to occupy Germany from the west.
__________________
Turtledove Award Winning Map Maker
Noravea's Maps and Flags
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old October 4th, 2012, 04:20 PM
Cook Cook is offline
Maybe I will
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Beyond the black stump
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noravea View Post
Germany gives up on the Western Front, and knowing the war is lost, allocate resources to the Eastern Front and allow the Allies to occupy Germany from the west.
The allies occupy Germany, and in accordance with their previous agreements, hand over the east to their ally: Stalin.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Georgepatton View Post
Operation Seacamel?!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emperor Julian View Post
Berlusconi for Pope: Why let the Church's collapse be slow?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyr View Post
a fairly realistic take on a zombie apocolypse
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old October 4th, 2012, 04:23 PM
Noravea Noravea is online now
Orwell of Future History
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cook View Post
The allies occupy Germany, and in accordance with their previous agreements, hand over the east to their ally: Stalin.
I thought the final Post-War agreements weren't agreed upon until 1945. I'm sure the Iron Curtain can be pushed to the Vistula and Danube if the Western Allies get lucky.
__________________
Turtledove Award Winning Map Maker
Noravea's Maps and Flags
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old October 4th, 2012, 04:36 PM
yourworstnightmare yourworstnightmare is offline
Trubbelmakare
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Tusen Sjöars Land
Posts: 1000 or more
No one cares Germany sues for peace. They demand unconditional surrender. Both Western Allies and Soviet at this point.
__________________
Still haven't changed my opinion
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old October 5th, 2012, 02:07 PM
Dathi THorfinnsson Dathi THorfinnsson is online now
Daši Žorfinnsson
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Syracuse, Haudenosaunee, Vinland
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noravea View Post
I thought the final Post-War agreements weren't agreed upon until 1945. I'm sure the Iron Curtain can be pushed to the Vistula and Danube if the Western Allies get lucky.
Yes, but that was minor quibbling, like do the French get a zone and where. The big decisions were made much earlier. I believe we had this discussion in one of the DDay threads, where it became clear that the borders had been set before then.
__________________
David Houston
un Canadien errant
my TL: Canada-wank (99% ASB-free) Turtledove 2010
updated: 1 Sep '12
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old October 5th, 2012, 02:51 PM
Hörnla Hörnla is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Dorsten, Germany
Posts: 1000 or more
Excuse me but - including the French as a fourth occupier was anything but minor.
I am not saying that this changes everything, but if the WAllies get into Germany with double speed and half the casualties, while Uncle Joe gets at least slowed down, it will habe some repercussions on the final outlook of Europe.

Also, I would say, that under the given conditions of such a "fighting surrender" the WAllies effort should be re-directed away from air-strikes, but into supporting the mobility and logistics of their advance (that is, if they understand what bring them forward!).

Germany will be dismantled and occupied, still. Perhaps the Soviet zone gets a bit smaller (minus Thuringia perhaps....someone must have seen the Fulda gap already on the first maps!). Perhaps Stalin gets no Austrian zone.

But the odds are higher that there is less of a tendency to pass whole countries into a "90% Soviet influence"-box.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old October 5th, 2012, 09:47 PM
jmc247 jmc247 is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noravea View Post
I thought the final Post-War agreements weren't agreed upon until 1945. I'm sure the Iron Curtain can be pushed to the Vistula and Danube if the Western Allies get lucky.
Two of the most important were held in 1945 which were Yalta in Feb and Potsdam in July.

Quote:
Also, I would say, that under the given conditions of such a "fighting surrender" the WAllies effort should be re-directed away from air-strikes, but into supporting the mobility and logistics of their advance (that is, if they understand what bring them forward!).
The fire bombings of civilian targets by that point had become an accepted way of fighting the war, but lets just say it would be a fair bit less popular in the West burning countless German civilians alive if you had a non-Nazi government who was asking for peace and waging a retreating campaign in the West.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old October 6th, 2012, 01:13 AM
modelcitizen modelcitizen is offline
note2self, no ranting ninjas
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmc247 View Post

The fire bombings of civilian targets by that point had become an accepted way of fighting the war, but lets just say it would be a fair bit less popular in the West burning countless German civilians alive if you had a non-Nazi government who was asking for peace and waging a retreating campaign in the West.

A non-Nazi government that had offed Hitler. I wonder what kind of pressure would be brought to bear on allied governments...
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old October 6th, 2012, 01:24 AM
Stolengood Stolengood is offline
Premium Blend
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1000 or more
I asked this question a few months ago; dunno if the thread should be restarted, but it generated 10 or so pages of discussion, so: http://www.alternatehistory.com/disc...d.php?t=239470

(Incidentally, didn't even know Snake'd been banned for more than a month until I looked at that thread; shame he won't be able to continue his "Arafat's Great Gamble" TL... )
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Meadow View Post
We're discussing alternate history. The whole basis of this subject is thesis and argument combined with fact.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleetlord View Post
Oh my god, did we break Spain?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old October 6th, 2012, 01:53 AM
MattII MattII is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 1000 or more
Assuming the conspirators win and move the majority of their forces east, how much further east could the border be drawn, could we in fact see an at least partially free Poland (I'm imagining a region with a border somewhere along the line of Elbląg, Warsaw, Poznań and Szczecin/Stettin)?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old October 6th, 2012, 01:59 AM
jmc247 jmc247 is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by modelcitizen View Post
A non-Nazi government that had offed Hitler. I wonder what kind of pressure would be brought to bear on allied governments...
The problem is London and Washington could just tell their people these guys are ardent Nazis and like any hard core Nazis they killed their boss because they want total power for themselves and most people would have believed it because the British and American public had no idea who this Beck guy was.

That was why many of the plotters wanted Rommel as either Reichspräsident or Chancellor if it worked, because they needed someone to be the face of the government to the West that it would be harder for the Western Allies to wave away to their people as just another evil power hungry Nazi.

By the way for those here who don't know about Beck.

Quote:
In 1943, Beck planned two abortive attempts to kill Hitler by means of a bomb. In May 1944, a memorandum by Field Marshal Erwin Rommel made it clear that his participation in the proposed putsch was based on the precondition that Beck serve as the head of state in the new government. In 1944, he was one of the driving forces of the 20 July plot with Carl Goerdeler and Colonel Claus von Stauffenberg. It was proposed that Beck would become the head of the provisional government that would assume power in Germany after Hitler had been eliminated

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludwig_Beck
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old October 6th, 2012, 02:04 AM
The Kiat The Kiat is offline
Now 20% Holier!
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The Left side of the State.
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by yourworstnightmare View Post
No one cares Germany sues for peace. They demand unconditional surrender. Both Western Allies and Soviet at this point.
If the plotters killed Hitler, they would be most disappointed about the war's outcome. That being said, they're better off trying to make a deal with Stalin; he wouldn't hesitate to screw over the allies. Or at least he'd be the most likely of the three to be pragmatic.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old October 6th, 2012, 02:09 AM
jmc247 jmc247 is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Kiat View Post
If the plotters killed Hitler, they would be most disappointed about the war's outcome. That being said, they're better off trying to make a deal with Stalin; he wouldn't hesitate to screw over the allies. Or at least he'd be the most likely of the three to be pragmatic.
That is actually correct and Stalin was seriously considering making a seperate peace with Hitler himself as late as 1943/early 44. Its simply that Hitler by that point would rather eat a bullet then make peace with him.

Stalin if he felt it would be to his advantage would be willing to make a seperate peace and watch as Germany and the Western Allies bleed themselves big time before stepping back into the ring when he feels the time is right.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old October 6th, 2012, 04:21 AM
Paul V McNutt Paul V McNutt is offline
Paul V McNutt
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1000 or more
I think Goering takes over but there is a power struggle.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old October 6th, 2012, 04:38 AM
jmc247 jmc247 is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul V McNutt View Post
I think Goering takes over but there is a power struggle.
There was a conflict over to kill or not to kill Goering as part of the plot and Stauffenberg's view of a 'limited purge' did win out.



Stauffenberg reminds me a fair bit like Brutus at least in so far as his sense of honor meant that he couldn't see that a real coup against a popular leader would require a deeper purge against not only the leader, but his key supporters in the government and other potental rivals of the coup plotters.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old October 6th, 2012, 04:13 PM
Rich Rostrom Rich Rostrom is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: The heights of glory, the depths of despair
Posts: 652
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmc247 View Post
There was a conflict over to kill or not to kill Goering as part of the plot and Stauffenberg's view of a 'limited purge' did win out.



Stauffenberg reminds me a fair bit like Brutus at least in so far as his sense of honor meant that he couldn't see that a real coup against a popular leader would require a deeper purge against not only the leader, but his key supporters in the government and other potental rivals of the coup plotters.
Everything I've read (Fest, Fitzgibbon) said that the Schwarze Kappelle wanted to get Hitler, Himmler, and Goering in one bang. There were several plans to get all three, and at least one attempt in early 1944 was aborted because one of the "big three" wouldn't be there.

The 20 July attempt on Hitler alone was made because the SK decided time was running out.

Also, Rommel was never a formal member of the SK, and IIRC wanted Hitler arrested and put on trial, not assassinated.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old October 6th, 2012, 04:22 PM
lucaswillen05 lucaswillen05 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 475
Ther may well have been a collapse on the Russian Front. Following the Destruction of Army Group Centre Model was still holding things together. Things were still holding together in France but assuming Operation Cobra went as per OTL the Wehrmacht would have had to pull back but probably the Mortain Counter attack and the Falaise Pocket would not have happened. The Wehrmach couldf have made a more efective fighting withdrawl in France. The end would probably have some similarities to the end of WW1 with some form of Armistice agreed in the autumn of 1944 as the Allies approached Germany's borders. Probably would have been a similar ending to the end of the First World War in Europe.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.