Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Discussion: After 1900

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 22nd, 2012, 02:04 AM
anw_rev anw_rev is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 758
AHC: Arcologies, Arcologies Everywhere

The challenge is to push the development of world's cities upward, not outward.
So
That by the year 2000, arcologies 500 meters high that house tens of thousands of people are considered normal.
This should happen not just in first world countries, but also second or third, like Mexico, Brazil, Egypt, India, Indonesia, and China.

POD preferably post-WW2, but shortly before it can be accepted.

Thanks in advance!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old August 22nd, 2012, 02:05 AM
The Ubbergeek The Ubbergeek is offline
Insane internet demigod (TN)
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Province of Quebec
Posts: 1000 or more
We are still a bit away from cyberpunk archologies I think, but closer...
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fred View Post
The Ubbergeek kills Canada
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old August 22nd, 2012, 03:31 AM
FDW FDW is online now
Biwinning Zettai Ryouiki Lover
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Ubbergeek View Post
We are still a bit away from cyberpunk archologies I think, but closer...
Yeah, I think so too. Though we probably have the technological means to build such structures…
__________________
CLINCH THE FIST!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old August 22nd, 2012, 04:04 AM
Herzen's love-child Herzen's love-child is offline
He's just zis guy, you know?
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: la costa a sinistra
Posts: 1000 or more
Think they will emerge in East Asia first. There are Chinese firms that are currently proposing pre-fab skyscrapers of immense size.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old August 22nd, 2012, 05:29 AM
XNM XNM is offline
Filthy anarchist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cascadian-occupied Los Angeles
Posts: 1000 or more
Some sort of POD that turns national dick-waving up to eleven may be needed.

Hm...maybe a Cold War in a world where aerospace technology isn't at all good enough to reach space?
__________________
Visit my tumblr!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian the Admin View Post
SHUT UP ABOUT PONIES.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soverihn View Post
What is this black magic fuckery?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old August 22nd, 2012, 08:53 AM
anw_rev anw_rev is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 758
Quote:
Originally Posted by MKN View Post
Some sort of POD that turns national dick-waving up to eleven may be needed.

Hm...maybe a Cold War in a world where aerospace technology isn't at all good enough to reach space?
...dick-waving? You mean like ultranationalism or fascism?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old August 22nd, 2012, 09:27 AM
DerGreif DerGreif is offline
A European Citizen
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Europe (Augsburg)
Posts: 262
This interesting thread by Doctor What might include helpful information.

Kind regards,
G.
__________________
Wer kämpft, kann verlieren.
Wer nicht kämpft, hat schon verloren.
(Bert Brecht)

A simple translation: Never ever give up.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old August 22nd, 2012, 05:53 PM
zippy zippy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 270
it needs a rather more wholesale adoption of Le Corbusier's 'streets in the sky ' type concept which means that there are far more developments like;s London's Barbican and that the likes of Sheffield's Park Hill flats or even the Quarry Hill flats in Leeds (now home to the 'Ministry of Truth' DoH building ) and similar developments don;t become an embarrassing blind alley reduced to slums ...

also some of the technical failings of high rise residential accommodation of the 'normal' tower block style needs to be avoided , such as 'concrete cancer' the difficulties with thermal issues where floor slabs run out to the exposed edges meaning the structure acts as a cold sink drawing heat from the flats into the structure ...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old August 22nd, 2012, 06:28 PM
Makemakean Makemakean is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1000 or more
A mutation in the human DNA around the Toba catastrophe ensures that the median penile length of all men thereafter is about 2 inches when fully erect.

We also have much bigger armies, much grander and luxurious cars and not even the most left-wing metropolitan elitist Democrat would ever think about questioning the Second Amendment.

Sorry, that should be the First Amendment. The right to bear arms is that important in this timeline that it was included before the right to free speech.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old August 22nd, 2012, 06:44 PM
Hipsterredneck556 Hipsterredneck556 is online now
Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Illinois
Posts: 423
Quote:
Originally Posted by Makemakean View Post
not even the most left-wing metropolitan elitist Democrat would ever think about questioning the Second Amendment.

Sorry, that should be the First Amendment. The right to bear arms is that important in this timeline that it was included before the right to free speech.
Really? We're going there?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old August 22nd, 2012, 06:58 PM
Beedok Beedok is online now
Clearly not human.
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Centauri Commonwealth
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Makemakean View Post
A mutation in the human DNA around the Toba catastrophe ensures that the median penile length of all men thereafter is about 2 inches when fully erect.

We also have much bigger armies, much grander and luxurious cars and not even the most left-wing metropolitan elitist Democrat would ever think about questioning the Second Amendment.

Sorry, that should be the First Amendment. The right to bear arms is that important in this timeline that it was included before the right to free speech.
Because no women have ever liked the idea of building grand monuments in history, only men who need to compensate. And if everyone were so small wouldn't there be no need to compensate because that was the new average?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old August 22nd, 2012, 10:01 PM
ModernKiwi ModernKiwi is offline
1% more
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: The only real city in NZ
Posts: 528
If you had the population panics of the late 1960's taken more seriously perhaps?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old August 22nd, 2012, 10:29 PM
Makemakean Makemakean is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hipsterredneck556 View Post
Really? We're going there?
Yes, I seriously think that to get to bottom of this issue we need to make a serious statistical study regarding support for gun control and penile length.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beedok View Post
Because no women have ever liked the idea of building grand monuments in history, only men who need to compensate.
Of course they have, just look at Catharine the Great. But you see, if male architects started to design much taller buildings, and we assume no reason to believe that women would start building smaller monuments as some sort of strange reaction, you'll have on average much taller, grander buildings.

See, you can mathematically prove that my statement implied no closet misogyny.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beedok View Post
And if everyone were so small wouldn't there be no need to compensate because that was the new average?
Note to self: never try joking about alternate history scenarios unless you've made a sincere effort to check that your joke-scenario is actually one that would happen. Especially when the subject being clichées regarding popular conceptions of Freudian psychoanalysis...
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old August 22nd, 2012, 10:56 PM
anw_rev anw_rev is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 758
Quote:
Originally Posted by Makemakean View Post
Yes, I seriously think that to get to bottom of this issue we need to make a serious statistical study regarding support for gun control and penile length.



Of course they have, just look at Catharine the Great. But you see, if male architects started to design much taller buildings, and we assume no reason to believe that women would start building smaller monuments as some sort of strange reaction, you'll have on average much taller, grander buildings.

See, you can mathematically prove that my statement implied no closet misogyny.



Note to self: never try joking about alternate history scenarios unless you've made a sincere effort to check that your joke-scenario is actually one that would happen. Especially when the subject being clichées regarding popular conceptions of Freudian psychoanalysis...
So we need an ATL filled with male-domination culture?
Kuche-und-Kirche view of women?
*facepalm*
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old August 22nd, 2012, 11:34 PM
Flocculencio Flocculencio is offline
Friendly Forum Authoritarian
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chaostan
Posts: 1000 or more
Send a message via MSN to Flocculencio
Quote:
Originally Posted by zippy View Post
it needs a rather more wholesale adoption of Le Corbusier's 'streets in the sky ' type concept which means that there are far more developments like;s London's Barbican and that the likes of Sheffield's Park Hill flats or even the Quarry Hill flats in Leeds (now home to the 'Ministry of Truth' DoH building ) and similar developments don;t become an embarrassing blind alley reduced to slums ...

also some of the technical failings of high rise residential accommodation of the 'normal' tower block style needs to be avoided , such as 'concrete cancer' the difficulties with thermal issues where floor slabs run out to the exposed edges meaning the structure acts as a cold sink drawing heat from the flats into the structure ...
The thing is, prefab concrete structures work a lot better in the tropics than temperate regions- Singapores massive concrete housing estates from the 60s nd 70s are far more comfortable and livable than British council flats of the same era because the materials are more suited to the climate.

With an arcology, however, the tropic would pose a new problem- cooling rather than heating
__________________
Bard of brave-banner'd Kr'rundor

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leo Caesius on the Khmer Rouge
The black pajamas were rather funky. The entire country had been invited to a sleepover...a sleepover of DOOM!
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old August 23rd, 2012, 12:08 AM
Coalition Coalition is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 598
The key with arcologies, at least initially, would be to build them as a series of linked tall buildings. A factory might want to have its workers nearby, so it purchases an apartment complex near the factory, for the workers to live there. Unfortunately, at shift change, the traffic jams are incredible.

So the 1960s engineers are handed this problem, and told to 'find a solution'. Their idea is a series of elevated walkways over the road (sufficiently high enough to clear all possible traffic), so the workers can walk to/from work, without clogging up traffic.

The factory also has the problem of getting rid of waste heat, and the apartments get cold in the winter. So a thermal vent is set up to go to the apartment complex heat intake. Instead of having to warm up cold air in the winter, it only has to disperse ~800 F air into the apartments. Excess heat can be simply vented.

A store is built nearby, to take advantage of the workers and their paychecks. Since the workers don't have cars, the massive parking lot is placed on the far side of the building, so the workers don't have as far to walk. Shipment of materials is handled by being near the rail line that also takes care of the factory. Coordination is required by the rail line, so the two have to work together.

Since the employees are walking on a third story walkway, the mall goes with a 4-5 story design, to make shopping easier, as people only have to go up or down floors, rather than walking farther. The more compact store frees up parking room on the ground, so it can handle more customers. Studies to increase customer flow are performed due to the fewer entrance room available, with the factory aiding.

This unified structure would have a lower environmental footprint since the waste of one building is used to help another. The convenience of not needing a car due to the short walks saves money that the employees can choose where to spend.

Lower ground space needed also means more land can be made available for parks. An electric train service is set up to move people from the apartment complex to the park for visits. Electricity is chosen over other power sources since there are fewer side emissions (compared to diesel exhaust).

Due to lack of car access, buildings are designed for people to be able to walk around easily, to and from. When a vehicle is needed, the workers would be able to travel to a dedicated rental facility, rather than trying to keep their car in some garage. Studies for additional floors are made with the understanding that material science advancements would be needed to allow for economic taller buildings.

Spreading out is not that attractive an option, as people are driving less, and walking more. A building several miles away from its intended customers simply goes bankrupt, unless it markets to the few people with enough spare cash to afford a car.

Additional work is commissioned to study the need to move people around quickly (due to potential for fire), along with air circulation (moving O2 in, and CO2 out). The advantage of being able to store more people in the same amount of ground space is noticed by several other cities that are having trouble with police response times due to longer distances. Several protest groups complain that the monitoring systems needed for the larger structures will turn the new cities into Police States that monitor their citizens' every move. Realists point out that it would need a computer with the computational capacity of over one hundred times the system speed of the most advanced supercomputer available to even try to keep track of all that data.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old August 23rd, 2012, 12:23 AM
anw_rev anw_rev is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 758
The factory's heat can simply be vented to the apartments

Any solution for same system in tropical climate?
I agree, the problem there is more of cooling
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old August 23rd, 2012, 01:42 AM
Richter10 Richter10 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 317
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coalition View Post
The key with arcologies, at least initially, would be to build them as a series of linked tall buildings. A factory might want to have its workers nearby, so it purchases an apartment complex near the factory, for the workers to live there. Unfortunately, at shift change, the traffic jams are incredible.

(...)

Additional work is commissioned to study the need to move people around quickly (due to potential for fire), along with air circulation (moving O2 in, and CO2 out). The advantage of being able to store more people in the same amount of ground space is noticed by several other cities that are having trouble with police response times due to longer distances. Several protest groups complain that the monitoring systems needed for the larger structures will turn the new cities into Police States that monitor their citizens' every move. Realists point out that it would need a computer with the computational capacity of over one hundred times the system speed of the most advanced supercomputer available to even try to keep track of all that data.
Sounds a really reasonable path! Maybe we could not have "Standard Arcologies", but maybe a serie of "Mini-Arcologies" if such integration process started at the 60's.

Maybe the rising enviromentalism would help to push such "Mini-Arcologies" (less used energy, less comsuption, less space occuped, etc.)?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old August 23rd, 2012, 02:23 AM
Alex1guy Alex1guy is offline
Vostroyan Firstborn
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: The New Zealand Empire
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Makemakean View Post
A mutation in the human DNA around the Toba catastrophe ensures that the median penile length of all men thereafter is about 2 inches when fully erect.

We also have much bigger armies, much grander and luxurious cars and not even the most left-wing metropolitan elitist Democrat would ever think about questioning the Second Amendment.

Sorry, that should be the First Amendment. The right to bear arms is that important in this timeline that it was included before the right to free speech.
That's probably the funniest thing I've read in a while
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Vulture View Post
Make some sweeping romantic gesture to impress her, like shooting Ronald Reagan.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old August 23rd, 2012, 03:44 AM
Corbell Mark IV Corbell Mark IV is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by anw_rev View Post
The challenge is to push the development of world's cities upward, not outward.
So
That by the year 2000, arcologies 500 meters high that house tens of thousands of people are considered normal.
This should happen not just in first world countries, but also second or third, like Mexico, Brazil, Egypt, India, Indonesia, and China.

POD preferably post-WW2, but shortly before it can be accepted.

Thanks in advance!
The central planning of it all makes it seem like a natural fit for Communism...

If you could have the Soviets get attached to the idea for ideological reasons AND MANAGE TO MAKE IT WORK, ie be a cost effective method of housing and urban planning...

Then they could try spreading the idea as a form of ideological proof of concept (for communism) or some line of propaganda.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.