I was thinking is it possible for the Czardom of Russia to annex more of Silesia(basically all of the Polish Silesia) including Austrian Silesia not just Siewierz and this includes Opole, Milicz and Cieszyn and Poznan and Galicia as well...
Different Congress of Vienna. OTL Prussia offered for Posen to remain with Russian Poland in return for being allowed to annex more of Saxony, and Austria was willing to give up Galicia to Russia in return for more parts of northern Italy. The deal wasn't allowed by Britain which feared a stronger Russia. If the British are smarter and realize Poland is more of a burden to Russia than benefit, you could have them allow the exchange to happen.
From there, annexing more of Silesia would only require Russia to win a war against either Prussia or Austria, possible during 1848 or in a Russian intervention during the Prusso-Austrian War.
As for the results - more Poles mean stronger uprisings and stronger Polish national sentiment. Possibly a succesful 1830 uprising, as well as possibly more international support for the Polish couse internationally, as the Austrians could see them as a way to harm Russia and Prussia.
I think a Congress having all of Polish Silesia and Posen will make Congress Poland an industrial backbone of Russia and Autonomous but dependent on Russia, I think it could act more like Finland.
Might we see Austria and Prussia/Germany providing funding and support to Polish groups as a way of weakening them? Certainly seems like a good way ot create a more organized polish nationalist movement.
also, would this prevent the Germanisation of parts of western Poland?
Larger Russian Poland would probably be even more rebellious.I think the Russians can annex more of Silesia in the French-Prussian war where in the French are allied with Russians, I think a Congress having all of Polish Silesia and Posen will make Congress Poland an industrial backbone of Russia and Autonomous but dependent on Russia, I think it could act more like Finland.
IMHO Austria would support such a Poland for the purpose of weakening Russia once the Holy Alliance breaks up and Metternich is gone. Until then, it would most likely see "Polish independence struggle" as a threat to its own existence, just as it perceived Belgium as such.
As for Prussia - there is still the problem with Pomeralia. German settler colonization might be stronger in that particular area of Germany, weaker in Posen since it wouldn't be part of Germany.
Perhaps it would also prevent Germany from Unifying as well..
Perhaps it would also prevent Germany from Unifying as well..
Plausibly. Larger Poland from the Vienna Congress ups the chances of it beating Russia in either 1830 or 1846. Thus during the spring of nations Poland sides with Austria against Prussia to get back Pomeralia, leading to the Olmutz Treaty being more severe for Prussia, preventing it from expanding in the future. German Union survives, as do the individual German states.
Different Congress of Vienna. OTL Prussia offered for Posen to remain with Russian Poland in return for being allowed to annex more of Saxony, and Austria was willing to give up Galicia to Russia in return for more parts of northern Italy. The deal wasn't allowed by Britain which feared a stronger Russia. If the British are smarter and realize Poland is more of a burden to Russia than benefit, you could have them allow the exchange to happen.
From there, annexing more of Silesia would only require Russia to win a war against either Prussia or Austria, possible during 1848 or in a Russian intervention during the Prusso-Austrian War.
As for the results - more Poles mean stronger uprisings and stronger Polish national sentiment. Possibly a succesful 1830 uprising, as well as possibly more international support for the Polish couse internationally, as the Austrians could see them as a way to harm Russia and Prussia.
Plausibly. Larger Poland from the Vienna Congress ups the chances of it beating Russia in either 1830 or 1846. Thus during the spring of nations Poland sides with Austria against Prussia to get back Pomeralia, leading to the Olmutz Treaty being more severe for Prussia, preventing it from expanding in the future. German Union survives, as do the individual German states.
Instead of each piece of Poland fighting against a different power, you would have united forces of all Poland fighting only single power (Russia). Polish chances go somewhat higher, IMO. Not to mention the fact that united Poland might get some support from other powers hostile to Russia. IOTL Russia, Prussia and Austria had common enemy - Polish independence movement. Every Polsish uprising had in fact 3 enemies. ITTL however Austra (e.g.) has no Polish lands at all and might be persuaded to help the Poles (offering a Habsburg duke as a king of Poland, perhaps?)I'm not exactly sure how a larger Poland guarantees a better chance of success rebelling against the Russians. After all IOTL both congressional Poland and former Lithuania rebelled against Moscow, and the Poles in Posen and Cracow against Berlin and Vienna, respectively, but that didn't succeed.
Originally posted by wolf_brother
Instead of each piece of Poland fighting against a different power, you would have united forces of all Poland fighting only single power (Russia). Polish chances go somewhat higher, IMO. Not to mention the fact that united Poland might get some support from other powers hostile to Russia. IOTL Russia, Prussia and Austria had common enemy - Polish independence movement. Every Polsish uprising had in fact 3 enemies. ITTL however Austra (e.g.) has no Polish lands at all and might be persuaded to help the Poles (offering a Habsburg duke as a king of Poland, perhaps?)