|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Would Germany Ever Split Up Austria-Hungary?
Assuming WW1 doesn't start in 1914 and Franz Ferdinand isn't assassinated, eventually AH is going to run into ethnic troubles.
1916-7 is going to be a bad period for AH, because Franz Josef dies and Franz Ferdinand is going to take the throne. He planned on fighting the Hungarian nobility for control over Hungary either politically or with the military. So that gets to my question: Would Germany ever sanction the break up of Austria-Hungary? They were Germany's only ally by 1914 and would likely remain so for decades. Still, it was a juicy target, as Germany could get Austria (including all of the German-speaking areas denied to it IOTL in 1919 like South Tyrol, Sopron, Pressburg, and better borders with Slovenia), Bohemia, and Moravia. Russia could get Galica, Romania Bukowina and Transsylvania, Serbia can get Bosnia-Herzogovina, Slovenia and Croatia can form their own country, while Italy gets nothing, because really, no one respected them, nor cozied to their idea of Empire. Hungary loses a lot, but keeps Slovakia minus Pressburg. This also means Russia can become friendlier with Germany...if they were willing to write off the Czechs. It makes Romania much friendlier once it has Transsylvania, it somewhat neutralizes Serbia's demands, while also getting Croatia-Slovenia and Hungary as economic client states. Italy probably becomes hostile, but is virtually no threat to Germany thanks to the Alps, even in South Tyrol. The Habsburg reduced realm can join Germany as a 5th kingdom, leaving them to govern themselves locally, but integrating them economically. Still this introduces lots of Catholics and increasingly socialists into the German Empire, which the Prussia nobility did not like, but the increasingly powerful Pan-German (Alldeutsch) groups in the middle class had no problem with that, but rather wanted a 'greater Germany'. So at what point, if ever, would Germany take a hand in breaking up Austria-Hungary? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
1. They would try to keep the corpse look alive as long as possible.
2. If that doesn't help, they'll try to prop up the Hungarians as new masters. 3. If that fails, they may accept Austria, Tyrolia and the Sudeten Germans into the Reich - or rather try to create a state from these remnants (depends whether the Reich has already become social democrat dominated or is still run by the old elites). 4. Nobody will get any friendlier to Germany by carving up a piece of the old empire. In fact, the War of Habsburg Succession may replace the Great War. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
For this you would have to have the Junkers less afraid of accepting more Catholics into Germany. Thus they may be willing to avoid the Zombie in the Middle of Europe dissolve, and they gobbling up the German speaking parts (and probably the Czech and Slovenian parts too).
__________________
Still haven't changed my opinion |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes, as evidently both Hindenburg and Ludendorff were actually planning their next war against the Dual Monarchy.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Also I was referring to a non-WW1 scenario, so H-L wouldn't be a factor. Nor would the intense hostility that cropped up during the war. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
We must also remember that the German Austrians at this point still were suspicious of Germany (Protestant Junker Hell hole under the wrong emperor), however the Junkers sidelined, and Germany getting more democratic, while Austria isn't could change that.
__________________
Still haven't changed my opinion |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
It all depends on the support of the Austrian people.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
2. Juridically speaking, the powers granted to the German Emperor aren't much, if any, greater than those still granted to the current King of the Belgians or Queen of the UK. The difference in actual power is mostly psychological, since a legislature which can convene of its own will and which has budget control and legislative initiative has the executive by the balls if only it can find a willing majority to do so. Assuming of course, that said executive can't use the military to, illegally in this case, keep control of things. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Germany will initially support the A-H against the Magyar rebellion/crackdown, but this risk to become the spark for a Great war analogue with the various nations fight for the corpse of A-H (and maybe the Ottoman Empire).
If all is avoided and a diplomatic solution is chosen, well Berlin with a lot of reluctance will take Austria (plus Tyrol) and Sudetenland and will try to inglobe the Czech, probably will try to reform the Triple Alliance with Italy (the big problem were with A-H not Germany) and Hungary so she will prop up their claims. |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
As far as I am aware the Habsburghs would need little support from the outside to perform the crack down of the Hungarian nobility, they would only need to unleash the Croats, Slovaks and the Romanians on them as the vanguard of the Imperial armies.
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
So in 1917 the AH army would be best positioned to settle things quickly before violence started. The Honved would get disarmed quickly and Budapest occupied very quickly. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
In such a scenario could we see Hungary be brought down a peg or two and the A-H reforming back into the Habsburgh Monarchy made out of
Grand Dutchy of Austria (England)*- western Hungary added as a autnomous provice with special privilegies to Slavs settled there Kingdom of Hungary (Ireland) - territorialy reduced Kingdom of Bohemia (N.Ireland) - predominatly German areas in Moravia alog the border with GDA added to GDA Kingdom of Croatia (Scotland) - Bosnia added as well as predominatly Slovene areas along the border to reduce the number of Slovenes in GDA Principality of Slovakia (Wales) - larger than OTL but without Pressburg Principality of Transylvania (???) - Principality of Galitzia (???) - |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Austro-Hungarian Empire is not destined to break apart or be parititoned nor was it 'dead' as so many people here seem to think.
To asnwer the question though, no, Germany would not attack A-H unless say somehow it went Socialist or something. One big thing people need to realize is that ethno-national states were NOT advocated by most of Europe at the time, the idea of each ethnicity having its own country is entirely an American conctruct forced on Europe after WWI. Essentially Russia, the Ottomans and Germany are not going to do something that endagers their own Multi-ethnic Empires just for a little more land. |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
In 1917 the A-H army was pretty busy on the Italian front, the Balkan front and the Russian front. Just where were those surplus supposed loyal A-H units to come from to "disarm the Honved and occupy Budapest"? Doing it before WW1 is certainly possible. Doing it in 1917 seems pretty much impossible? |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
As many other have said, Germany are unlikely to partition Austria-Hungary. For Germany it wwould mean replacing a somewhat reliable partner for an weaker and more unreliable ones (Hungary) and it would give Germany a lot of troublesome minorities. Germany was better off with a surviving Austria-Hungary than a dead one.
|
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|