Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Discussion: After 1900

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old August 10th, 2012, 04:07 PM
Just Leo Just Leo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1000 or more
It screams nazi mega-project, doesn't it.
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old August 10th, 2012, 04:42 PM
Dathi THorfinnsson Dathi THorfinnsson is offline
Daši Žorfinnsson
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Syracuse, Haudenosaunee, Vinland
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by modelcitizen View Post
English-speaking person, keeping a straight face: "That's a big Fokker, isn't it?"

German companion: "Oh, yah."
Ja, ja but dese fokkers, dey was messerschmidts!
__________________
David Houston
un Canadien errant
my TL: Canada-wank (99% ASB-free) Turtledove 2010
updated: 1 Sep '12
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old August 10th, 2012, 04:44 PM
Dathi THorfinnsson Dathi THorfinnsson is offline
Daši Žorfinnsson
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Syracuse, Haudenosaunee, Vinland
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by DD951 View Post
Hmm, from some poking around, it looks like it might have been possible to make a good chunk of the 377's lower level into a second passenger cabin at the expense of a large part of the cargo hold if someone had an operational requirement for it, but I don't think anyone tried developing the airframe in that direction.

Another possibility from the immediate post-war era could have been the Lockheed R6V Constitution, which first flew in 1946, though it was considered a failure- the USN felt it was too expensive to operate, while Pan Am ultimately decided it was too big & underpowered to be practical even though the design had originally been proposed to them as something that would exceed the performance & capacity of the Constellation, effectively killing the proposed airliner version; the 2 prototypes in USN service also turned out to have too short of a range & prone to engine overheating; a turboprop motor being developed by Wright might have salvaged the design but never got outside the prototype stage
Interestingly, the constitution only carried 168 passengers. Which is a lot for 1946, but nothing like a 380.
__________________
David Houston
un Canadien errant
my TL: Canada-wank (99% ASB-free) Turtledove 2010
updated: 1 Sep '12
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old August 10th, 2012, 04:46 PM
Dathi THorfinnsson Dathi THorfinnsson is offline
Daši Žorfinnsson
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Syracuse, Haudenosaunee, Vinland
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Just Leo View Post
It screams nazi mega-project, doesn't it.
Ja. The gigant was something, wasnt it? Especially before they put engines on it.
__________________
David Houston
un Canadien errant
my TL: Canada-wank (99% ASB-free) Turtledove 2010
updated: 1 Sep '12
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old August 10th, 2012, 05:20 PM
Michel Van Michel Van is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Liege Belgium Europe
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dathi THorfinnsson View Post
Ja. The gigant was something, wasnt it? Especially before they put engines on it.
Original the Gigant was planned as glider with no engine !
that oger was pull by a monstrosity call the He-111Z, two He-111 bomber bolted together with there wings on a 5 engine.
http://www.wwiivehicles.com/germany/...-bomber-01.png
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWgknGWDkOI
But too much He-111Z with Gitgant crash during takeoff or pullcable rip during flight or a easy target for Allies fighters
so they equipped the Gigant with Engine, with same result: Crash during take off or landing or a easy target for Allies fighters...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1OvyO...eature=related

Last edited by Michel Van; August 10th, 2012 at 05:25 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old August 10th, 2012, 05:36 PM
Just Leo Just Leo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1000 or more
History is full of really big airplanes, usually underpowered. What history needed was turbofan engines in the 70,000 lb thrust class.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old August 10th, 2012, 06:46 PM
Luath Luath is offline
Satisfied Amtrak customer
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: CF 105 cockpit
Posts: 321
Quote:
Originally Posted by modelcitizen View Post
Vickers had planned a double-decker VC10, http://www.vc10.net/History/DDVC10_page5.html

Edit: I think that the prospect of that had been in the 1960s.

(VC10 info http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VC10#cite_note-6 and http://www.vc10.net/index.html )

Huh, I didn't know Gerry Anderson worked for Vickers.
__________________
Caboose man on the ol 'Grind and dust'

Quote:
Originally Posted by aktarian View Post
If it's stupid and it works it's not stupid.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old August 10th, 2012, 08:51 PM
Anderman Anderman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 310
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xavier View Post
I'm pretty sure that Boeing originally planned for the 747's upper deck to extend all the way to the tail.
There was a doubledecker design from Boeing

http://rides.webshots.com/photo/2360...48918155DrQvBs
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old August 10th, 2012, 11:55 PM
Bureaucromancer Bureaucromancer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 592
Quote:
Originally Posted by DD951 View Post
Hmm, from some poking around, it looks like it might have been possible to make a good chunk of the 377's lower level into a second passenger cabin at the expense of a large part of the cargo hold if someone had an operational requirement for it, but I don't think anyone tried developing the airframe in that direction.
Sure, but there's really not that much stopping someone from cutting emergency hatches hatches in the holds of most widebodies and sticking passengers down there.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old August 11th, 2012, 01:20 AM
Just Leo Just Leo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1000 or more
The Convair XC-99 could carry 400 troops on two decks. Too much trouble. Based on the B-36 wing, one built and operated.
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.