Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Discussion: Before 1900

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old August 7th, 2012, 05:40 AM
Medicus Verni Medicus Verni is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Land of tilting vase
Posts: 93
Quote:
Originally Posted by FDW View Post
There's also the fact that Song generally had a vigorous "civil society" (If you could call it that) that might not stand for something like that, especially the confucian scholars.
Agreed, victors in these cases often turn to the influential intelligentsia to secure their rule, and to do that they would definitely have to don the 'ruler' outfit and show some willingness not to through brute force.

Speaking of Song, it suffered from the loss of a natural geographical barrier that was the Sixteen Prefectures along with the military fortifications in the area, thus was much more subject to nomadic incursions.

I have been thinking of an earlier POD in which the Emperor Shizong of Later Zhou managed to pull off his reconquest instead of succumbing to illness at 38 (in the middle of the campaign no less). That way, the central plain would be less vulnerable to nomads (and there would be no need to plant trees around Kaifeng for strategic purposes). Of course then, Song may well be butterflied entirely out of existence, but what do you think other then that?

Btw, these are some previous threads on warring states and the three kingdoms that may be relevant to our purposes.
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old August 7th, 2012, 06:31 AM
WhatIsAUserName WhatIsAUserName is offline
Professional Catatonic
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: San Joaquin County, CA
Posts: 1000 or more
That would depend on how well the Later Zhou perform against the Northern Han and the Liao Dynasty. I have no doubts that Shizong can conquer the former, but I don't know why his performance would be that much better against the latter. I'm not sure what Zhou Shizong had that Song Taizu and Taizong didn't. After all, the Liao already obtained the Sixteen Prefectures in 937, before the Later Zhou came into existence.
__________________
Sweet Dew: The Tang Dynasty lasts longer, leading to a more expansionist China, among many other effects.
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old August 7th, 2012, 07:09 AM
Medicus Verni Medicus Verni is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Land of tilting vase
Posts: 93
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhatIsAUserName View Post
That would depend on how well the Later Zhou perform against the Northern Han and the Liao Dynasty. I have no doubts that Shizong can conquer the former, but I don't know why his performance would be that much better against the latter. I'm not sure what Zhou Shizong had that Song Taizu and Taizong didn't. After all, the Liao already obtained the Sixteen Prefectures in 937, before the Later Zhou came into existence.
I am betting on it because Zhou Shizong is arguably one of the more, if not most competent emperor during the Five Dynasty period. His martial prowess notwithstanding , I believe his restorative policies at least lay the groundwork for the stability of early Song.

Btw, my previous post was referring to the northern campaign he was making in 959, in which he intended to retake the Sixteen Prefectures from Liao. He was making good progress, taking several prefectures in Hebei, but fell ill just before he mounted a siege on Youzhou. Of course, you make a fair point in that the prefectures were lost earlier, but I prefer some twists if plausible, rather than having them not ceded to Liao by Shi Jingtang in the first place.
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old August 7th, 2012, 10:20 AM
Petike Petike is offline
Sky Pirate Extraordinaire
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Gothic Clockpunk Kingdom of Zemplín's crown colony of Franz Joseph's Land
Posts: 1000 or more
Awesome thread !

This is definitely going into the POD resource section.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thande View Post
History is written by the victors, unless they're illiterate
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coyote Knight on Tom Bombadil's true nature View Post
Either Gandalf's younger brother, or Gandalf's Tyler Durden.
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old August 14th, 2012, 08:23 PM
WhatIsAUserName WhatIsAUserName is offline
Professional Catatonic
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: San Joaquin County, CA
Posts: 1000 or more
A Han Dynasty idea with potentially major effect on the Three Kingdoms: what if Cao Cao lost at Guandu against Yuan Shao? This may or may not involve Cao Cao's death, since he did lead troops personally. If he lost, would we still see a Three Kingdoms scenario, with Yuan instead of Cao as the greatest power in the north, or would we see four states?
__________________
Sweet Dew: The Tang Dynasty lasts longer, leading to a more expansionist China, among many other effects.
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old August 14th, 2012, 10:09 PM
FDW FDW is online now
Biwinning Zettai Ryouiki Lover
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhatIsAUserName View Post
A Han Dynasty idea with potentially major effect on the Three Kingdoms: what if Cao Cao lost at Guandu against Yuan Shao? This may or may not involve Cao Cao's death, since he did lead troops personally. If he lost, would we still see a Three Kingdoms scenario, with Yuan instead of Cao as the greatest power in the north, or would we see four states?
I'm inclined to say four states.
__________________
CLINCH THE FIST!
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old August 18th, 2012, 10:01 PM
Grouchio Grouchio is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Scarborough, Maine, USA
Posts: 890
Any possible scenarios for the 5 Dynasties and 10 Kingdoms period?
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old August 20th, 2012, 09:27 PM
WhatIsAUserName WhatIsAUserName is offline
Professional Catatonic
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: San Joaquin County, CA
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grouchio View Post
Any possible scenarios for the 5 Dynasties and 10 Kingdoms period?
There's one right on this page with the Later Zhou.

Anways, scenarios for this period are probably going to see the northern Dynasties reunite China at the expense of the southern Kingdoms. Though this period could conceivably lead to a long period of fragmentation, perhaps more than a century, I still think unification is more likely. Whether or not the Khitans form the Liao and take the Sixteen Prefectures depends on the scenario.

However, the possible effects of Shatuo Turks unifying China will be vast. The Later Tang have some chance, the Later Jin less so, and the Later Han have basically no chance.
__________________
Sweet Dew: The Tang Dynasty lasts longer, leading to a more expansionist China, among many other effects.
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old August 20th, 2012, 09:33 PM
FDW FDW is online now
Biwinning Zettai Ryouiki Lover
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grouchio View Post
Any possible scenarios for the 5 Dynasties and 10 Kingdoms period?
Maybe having Balhae survive? That would be very interesting for East Asian History. Also, there's the possibility of Wuyue managing to untie Southern China too
__________________
CLINCH THE FIST!
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old August 20th, 2012, 10:02 PM
WhatIsAUserName WhatIsAUserName is offline
Professional Catatonic
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: San Joaquin County, CA
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by FDW View Post
Maybe having Balhae survive? That would be very interesting for East Asian History. Also, there's the possibility of Wuyue managing to untie Southern China too
That second part isn't impossible, though still difficult, and you'd need an early change to allow Wuyue to become stronger than Wu (confusing, I know).
__________________
Sweet Dew: The Tang Dynasty lasts longer, leading to a more expansionist China, among many other effects.
Reply With Quote
  #71  
Old August 20th, 2012, 11:31 PM
FDW FDW is online now
Biwinning Zettai Ryouiki Lover
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhatIsAUserName View Post
That second part isn't impossible, though still difficult, and you'd need an early change to allow Wuyue to become stronger than Wu (confusing, I know).
Oh certainly, especially given the Chinese tendency to have single syllable states. I brought Wuyue into the spotlight because they managed several shifts in kings, who were relatively competent.
__________________
CLINCH THE FIST!
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old August 21st, 2012, 12:30 AM
WhatIsAUserName WhatIsAUserName is offline
Professional Catatonic
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: San Joaquin County, CA
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by FDW View Post
Oh certainly, especially given the Chinese tendency to have single syllable states. I brought Wuyue into the spotlight because they managed several shifts in kings, who were relatively competent.
Yes, but they were competent in the sense that they knew how to avoid unnecessary war and how to gain huge profit from commerce and trade. You would need a few changes to get Wuyue to be stronger than Wu, because otherwise Wuyue would be limited to a small area while Southern Tang has the freedom to expand to take over a much larger part of Southern China. Without Wuyue gaining the upper hand over Southern Tang, you won't see a Wuyue running Southern China.
__________________
Sweet Dew: The Tang Dynasty lasts longer, leading to a more expansionist China, among many other effects.
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old August 21st, 2012, 12:37 AM
FDW FDW is online now
Biwinning Zettai Ryouiki Lover
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhatIsAUserName View Post
Yes, but they were competent in the sense that they knew how to avoid unnecessary war and how to gain huge profit from commerce and trade. You would need a few changes to get Wuyue to be stronger than Wu, because otherwise Wuyue would be limited to a small area while Southern Tang has the freedom to expand to take over a much larger part of Southern China. Without Wuyue gaining the upper hand over Southern Tang, you won't see a Wuyue running Southern China.
They could conquer Min earlier than OTL, and they could probably avoid some wars against Wu, by simply being "Yue".
__________________
CLINCH THE FIST!
Reply With Quote
  #74  
Old August 21st, 2012, 12:41 AM
WhatIsAUserName WhatIsAUserName is offline
Professional Catatonic
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: San Joaquin County, CA
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by FDW View Post
They could conquer Min earlier than OTL, and they could probably avoid some wars against Wu, by simply being "Yue".
Also true, but I still stand by my assertion that the Southern Tang are in the best position to unit Southern China (Northern and Southern Dynasties recap, anybody?) due to geographic reasons favoring Wu/Southern Tang and the focus of Wuyue on trade.

I don't know if Wu fought wars with Wuyue over the name "Wu," though it would be very easy for Wuyue to just call itself Yue. But that also defeats the whole idea of a two-character name.

To be honest, many dynasties can be considered two-characters in name. Just from this time period, talking about "Southern Tang" versus "Nantang" is a matter of English convention.
__________________
Sweet Dew: The Tang Dynasty lasts longer, leading to a more expansionist China, among many other effects.
Reply With Quote
  #75  
Old August 21st, 2012, 01:46 AM
FDW FDW is online now
Biwinning Zettai Ryouiki Lover
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhatIsAUserName View Post
Also true, but I still stand by my assertion that the Southern Tang are in the best position to unit Southern China (Northern and Southern Dynasties recap, anybody?) due to geographic reasons favoring Wu/Southern Tang and the focus of Wuyue on trade.

I don't know if Wu fought wars with Wuyue over the name "Wu," though it would be very easy for Wuyue to just call itself Yue. But that also defeats the whole idea of a two-character name.

To be honest, many dynasties can be considered two-characters in name. Just from this time period, talking about "Southern Tang" versus "Nantang" is a matter of English convention.
The Kings of Wu, thought that the "Wu" in "Wuyue" represented a claim on Wu's territory, which was the cause of the bad blood between the kingdoms.
__________________
CLINCH THE FIST!
Reply With Quote
  #76  
Old August 27th, 2012, 11:38 PM
WhatIsAUserName WhatIsAUserName is offline
Professional Catatonic
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: San Joaquin County, CA
Posts: 1000 or more
Alright, it's been a week and nobody else has posted anything, so here are a few more ideas, all roughly Warring States Period:
  • How can we get Jin to continue intact into the Warring States instead of being divided into three states?
  • After overrunning much of Qi, could Yan become a more powerful state and displace Qi?
  • How would things look if either Wu or Yue managed to survive and displace Chu in the south?
  • Speaking of which, Chu: why the love for a Chu unification, and how would it look like?
  • Shu and Ba as independent states: do we know enough to guess how this would look like instead?
  • Challenge: get the Rong, Di, and other barbarians to form their own major states in China during this time period.
  • Other potential major players: perhaps Song, Lu, or Zhongshan as one of the Big Seven?
And so forth.
__________________
Sweet Dew: The Tang Dynasty lasts longer, leading to a more expansionist China, among many other effects.
Reply With Quote
  #77  
Old September 21st, 2012, 08:12 AM
WhatIsAUserName WhatIsAUserName is offline
Professional Catatonic
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: San Joaquin County, CA
Posts: 1000 or more
Well, it's been a month since anybody posted here, so my new ideas:
  • No division between Eastern and Western Zhou: how would things look like if the Western Zhou survived?
  • A bit later: What if there's no War of the Eight Princes to bring down the Jin Dynasty?
  • The Sui Dynasty reportedly invaded an island somewhere in the East China Sea. If this was true, it was probably one of the Ryukyuan islands or Taiwan. What if this area was incorporated into China?
Any takers?
__________________
Sweet Dew: The Tang Dynasty lasts longer, leading to a more expansionist China, among many other effects.
Reply With Quote
  #78  
Old September 21st, 2012, 02:23 PM
FDW FDW is online now
Biwinning Zettai Ryouiki Lover
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhatIsAUserName View Post
Alright, it's been a week and nobody else has posted anything, so here are a few more ideas, all roughly Warring States Period:

Quote:
[LIST][*]How would things look if either Wu or Yue managed to survive and displace Chu in the south?
Well, they would be more powerful for one, and if they unified China, then we might see a much more navally oriented dynasty than any of the OTL dynasties.
[*]Challenge: get the Rong, Di, and other barbarians to form their own major states in China during this time period.
The Yi did, they founded Wu.

Quote:
Originally Posted by WhatIsAUserName View Post
[*]No division between Eastern and Western Zhou: how would things look like if the Western Zhou survived?
Western Zhou's capital was close to the frontier, and thus vulnerable to enemy attack. Holding off the attack that caused the initial move might allow the Zhou to exercise power over their domain for a little while longer, but between the location of their capital and their manner of government, it was only a matter of time before we saw the Spring and Autumn period in China.

Quote:
[*]The Sui Dynasty reportedly invaded an island somewhere in the East China Sea. If this was true, it was probably one of the Ryukyuan islands or Taiwan. What if this area was incorporated into China?
I don't find this that likely, since China's never really given much of a shit about overseas territories. (Until the modern period)
__________________
CLINCH THE FIST!
Reply With Quote
  #79  
Old September 21st, 2012, 02:59 PM
WhatIsAUserName WhatIsAUserName is offline
Professional Catatonic
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: San Joaquin County, CA
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by FDW View Post
The Yi did, they founded Wu.
I don't buy that. Wu was in the south, and might have been Austroasiatic in nature, while the Yi cities were in Shandong in the east (they weren't all nomads like some Chinese historians claimed).

Quote:
Originally Posted by FDW View Post
Western Zhou's capital was close to the frontier, and thus vulnerable to enemy attack. Holding off the attack that caused the initial move might allow the Zhou to exercise power over their domain for a little while longer, but between the location of their capital and their manner of government, it was only a matter of time before we saw the Spring and Autumn period in China.
The first part is technically true, but I should point out that the Qin used those same territories to build a power base which eventually conquered the rest of the Chinese states. Their capital was basically in the same area as the old Zhou one, and I don't think the Qin capital was sacked during this time period.

The second part about their style of governance is completely true. I hadn't thought about that. Still an ahistorical rump Zhou filling in the role of the historical Qin would be interesting.

Quote:
Originally Posted by FDW View Post
I don't find this that likely, since China's never really given much of a shit about overseas territories. (Until the modern period)
Again, technically true again, but I should point out that there is one exception, not too much farther away from the mainland than Liuqiu (Taiwan or Ryukyus), and that would be Hainan. Even Taiwan as a giant gulag, Hainan style, would have massive repercussions on the island's history if it was settled earlier.
__________________
Sweet Dew: The Tang Dynasty lasts longer, leading to a more expansionist China, among many other effects.
Reply With Quote
  #80  
Old September 21st, 2012, 10:16 PM
FDW FDW is online now
Biwinning Zettai Ryouiki Lover
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhatIsAUserName View Post
I don't buy that. Wu was in the south, and might have been Austroasiatic in nature, while the Yi cities were in Shandong in the east (they weren't all nomads like some Chinese historians claimed).
I thought the Yi were in Jiangsu and Anhui as well as Shandong. (And I'm not claiming that they're nomadic)

Quote:
The first part is technically true, but I should point out that the Qin used those same territories to build a power base which eventually conquered the rest of the Chinese states. Their capital was basically in the same area as the old Zhou one, and I don't think the Qin capital was sacked during this time period.
Qin's power base was actually to the west of Zhao's, and it relied more administrative and economic development (aided by geography that made it easier to defend).

Quote:
The second part about their style of governance is completely true. I hadn't thought about that. Still an ahistorical rump Zhou filling in the role of the historical Qin would be interesting.
Maybe, but I'm more interested in an "incomplete" unification of China.

Quote:
Again, technically true again, but I should point out that there is one exception, not too much farther away from the mainland than Liuqiu (Taiwan or Ryukyus), and that would be Hainan. Even Taiwan as a giant gulag, Hainan style, would have massive repercussions on the island's history if it was settled earlier.
Hainan is much closer to the mainland than the Ryukyu's or Taiwan. (Hainan is only separated from the mainland by a strait 19 miles wide, while the strait separating Taiwan from China is more than 100 miles wide)
__________________
CLINCH THE FIST!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.