Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Discussion: Before 1900

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 22nd, 2012, 04:57 AM
Franz Josef II Franz Josef II is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hofburg, Vienna
Posts: 468
AHC: The Habsburg Monarchy gets a Third Crown

It has often been said that if Austria had established a trialist government (preferably with the Czechs) the Empire would have been more stable. Your challenge is, make this a reality. I have some ideas, but I want to see what you fine lads come up with
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old July 22nd, 2012, 04:58 AM
Franz Josef II Franz Josef II is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hofburg, Vienna
Posts: 468
Sorry, I should have been a bit more specific: no earlier than 1867
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old July 22nd, 2012, 05:18 AM
Juam Maxwell Juam Maxwell is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 27
Bosnia comes to mind,there were too many Germans in Bohemia and they were part of the Austrian crown for centuries.Maybe in Galicia?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old July 22nd, 2012, 05:24 AM
pearsonwright pearsonwright is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 306
Potentially some Slavic entity, or maybe Ukraine after a WWI victory
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old July 22nd, 2012, 05:30 AM
Juam Maxwell Juam Maxwell is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by pearsonwright View Post
Potentially some Slavic entity, or maybe Ukraine after a WWI victory
I thought the Ukraine was supposed to be a German puppet?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old July 22nd, 2012, 06:49 AM
KACKO KACKO is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 769
Theoretically there was third crown once. In 1836 Ferdinand V was crowned as last king of Bohemia. He was crowned as king of Hungary in 1830 and become Austrian Imperor in 1835.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old July 22nd, 2012, 06:57 AM
Franz Josef II Franz Josef II is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hofburg, Vienna
Posts: 468
Quote:
Originally Posted by Juam Maxwell View Post
Bosnia comes to mind,there were too many Germans in Bohemia and they were part of the Austrian crown for centuries.Maybe in Galicia?
The Germans formed the majority in what later be termed the Sudetenland, and there were enclaves elsewhere, but the Czechs formed a compact core. They were the most highly politicized non - German, non - Magyar element in the Monarchy. The Habsburgs would have had an easy time of things had they made some kind of arrangement with the Old Czechs
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old July 22nd, 2012, 06:59 AM
Franz Josef II Franz Josef II is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hofburg, Vienna
Posts: 468
Quote:
Originally Posted by KACKO View Post
Theoretically there was third crown once. In 1836 Ferdinand V was crowned as last king of Bohemia. He was crowned as king of Hungary in 1830 and become Austrian Imperor in 1835.
I'm talking about a real division of political power, not simply the symbolic act itself.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old July 22nd, 2012, 07:01 AM
Franz Josef II Franz Josef II is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hofburg, Vienna
Posts: 468
Quote:
Originally Posted by pearsonwright View Post
Potentially some Slavic entity, or maybe Ukraine after a WWI victory
Categorically, Vienna would never consider annexing the Ukraine for a number of reasons - the most important being that it would completely destroy the delicate political balance in the Monarchy - this was the reason that the question of annexing Serbia caused such anxiety in some quarters.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old July 22nd, 2012, 09:49 AM
Clandango Clandango is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Franz Josef II View Post
Categorically, Vienna would never consider annexing the Ukraine for a number of reasons - the most important being that it would completely destroy the delicate political balance in the Monarchy - this was the reason that the question of annexing Serbia caused such anxiety in some quarters.
Instead they were going to seperate the Poles from the Ruthenians on East Galicia. Anyways, how about the French Revolution and Napoleonic Wars led to more executed monarchs, leaning to Austria inherinitng Tuscany and other lands from the cadet branches of the Hapsburgs?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old July 22nd, 2012, 10:20 AM
kasumigenx kasumigenx is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Occupied Selurong
Posts: 1000 or more
Send a message via Yahoo to kasumigenx
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clandango View Post
Instead they were going to seperate the Poles from the Ruthenians on East Galicia. Anyways, how about the French Revolution and Napoleonic Wars led to more executed monarchs, leaning to Austria inherinitng Tuscany and other lands from the cadet branches of the Hapsburgs?
Why not put the Poles in an expanded Duchy of Krakow which is separated from Galicia.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kang Seung Jae View Post
No.

WIlson was a hyprocrat: the "self determination" was for the European people only, not the "uncivilized" people in the colonies.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old July 22nd, 2012, 10:25 AM
Clandango Clandango is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1000 or more
Elaborate.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old July 22nd, 2012, 10:35 AM
kasumigenx kasumigenx is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Occupied Selurong
Posts: 1000 or more
Send a message via Yahoo to kasumigenx
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clandango View Post
Elaborate.
I mean a Grand Duchy of Krakow which has all polish parts of Galicia separated from Galicia, they should merge it with Austrian Silesia and make Galicia and Krakow autonomous inside the Austrian Empire and elevate Ukrainian Galicia as a Kingdom.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kang Seung Jae View Post
No.

WIlson was a hyprocrat: the "self determination" was for the European people only, not the "uncivilized" people in the colonies.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old July 22nd, 2012, 10:40 AM
Clandango Clandango is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by kasumigenx View Post
I mean a Grand Duchy of Krakow which has all polish parts of Galicia separated from Galicia, they should merge it with Austrian Silesia and make Galicia and Krakow autonomous inside the Austrian Empire and elevate Ukrainian Galicia as a Kingdom.
Silesia had many Germans and was extremely valuable real estate. Maybe instead gi back earlier she the Austrian Empire had even more of Poland.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old July 22nd, 2012, 10:55 AM
kasumigenx kasumigenx is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Occupied Selurong
Posts: 1000 or more
Send a message via Yahoo to kasumigenx
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clandango View Post
Silesia had many Germans and was extremely valuable real estate. Maybe instead gi back earlier she the Austrian Empire had even more of Poland.
The Silesia that Austria retained does have a Polish majority, especially Cieszyn.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kang Seung Jae View Post
No.

WIlson was a hyprocrat: the "self determination" was for the European people only, not the "uncivilized" people in the colonies.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old July 22nd, 2012, 11:06 AM
Clandango Clandango is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by kasumigenx View Post
The Silesia that Austria retained does have a Polish majority, especially Cieszyn.
I amaware. Doesn't make much of a different though with Austrian lands.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old July 22nd, 2012, 11:54 AM
Thoomas Thoomas is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 4
What if Austria-Hungary takes sides with the Ottomans in 1877 and acquires the Congress Poland from Russia. Later it can be merged with Galicia and Bukovina to create the new Kingdom of Poland.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old July 22nd, 2012, 02:09 PM
wolf_brother wolf_brother is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: UTC−6
Posts: 1000 or more
If the Austroslavics had been successful in 1848 you'd have seen a Hapsburg monarchy with at least six crowns.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old July 22nd, 2012, 02:44 PM
jkarr jkarr is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by wolf_brother View Post
If the Austroslavics had been successful in 1848 you'd have seen a Hapsburg monarchy with at least six crowns.
could just imagine jospeh trying to wear em all at once x3
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old July 22nd, 2012, 02:46 PM
Clandango Clandango is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by jkarr View Post
could just imagine jospeh trying to wear em all at once x3
The Pope wore three. It shouldn't be that much harder.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.