Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Discussion: After 1900

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 15th, 2012, 10:57 PM
JoeMulk JoeMulk is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1000 or more
AHC: Confederate nostalgia considered unacceptable

How could you get a timeline where confederate nostalgia and displaying the confederate flag was considered as unacceptable as nazi nostalgia and displaying the swastika is in Germany?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old April 15th, 2012, 10:59 PM
Wolfpaw Wolfpaw is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: God Hates Flags
Posts: 1000 or more
Don't allow for the Lost Causers to dominate the historiography of the Civil War and thereby giving an air of noble respectability to a clutch of treacherous slavocrats.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old April 15th, 2012, 11:02 PM
revolutionincyberspace revolutionincyberspace is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeMulk View Post
How could you get a timeline where confederate nostalgia and displaying the confederate flag was considered as unacceptable as nazi nostalgia and displaying the swastika is in Germany?
Isn't TL-191 basically that?

Also, I'd say the CSA has a nasty race war post-independence and then the US conquers everything in former CSA. You could see a Yugoslavia analogue with the black population considering the CSA symbols the same way Serbs consider fascist croat symbols. Granted the white population would still be more ambivalent towards it. It'd be basically a more exxtreme version from OTL
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old April 15th, 2012, 11:05 PM
Ace Venom Ace Venom is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 634
Send a message via AIM to Ace Venom
It's pretty simple. Have the Federal government consider the display of Confederate symbols a crime following the ACW. It would have also made a dent if all Confederate politicians and officers were executed for treason and anyone who continued to support the Confederacy after the war would have been considered a traitor. The Federal government could have also ruled that Confederate veterans would be ineligible to ever receive pensions because they fought against their country. Then the Federal government could have stepped in and banned any Confederate veterans organizations. It's a bit harsh, but I think it would have sent the message.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old April 15th, 2012, 11:21 PM
Wendell Wendell is offline
Panned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lost in what might have been
Posts: 1000 or more
Have Booth's full plot come off. The Radical Republicans take a much tougher line toward the South, and effectively ban Confederate nostalgia among other things.
__________________
What if?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old April 16th, 2012, 12:05 AM
whitecrow whitecrow is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 979
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ace Venom View Post
It's pretty simple. Have the Federal government consider the display of Confederate symbols a crime following the ACW. It would have also made a dent if all Confederate politicians and officers were executed for treason and anyone who continued to support the Confederacy after the war would have been considered a traitor. The Federal government could have also ruled that Confederate veterans would be ineligible to ever receive pensions because they fought against their country. Then the Federal government could have stepped in and banned any Confederate veterans organizations. It's a bit harsh, but I think it would have sent the message.
Wouldn't that lead to more civil unrest post war? Possibly resulting in more trouble down the line?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old April 16th, 2012, 12:28 AM
SergeantHeretic SergeantHeretic is offline
Eternal student of history
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Dothan, Alabama
Posts: 1000 or more
You want to make the display of the stars and bars and Confederate Nostalgia be frowned on and disaproved of?

Simple, as another poster said, don't let the lost causers have free reign post war but that's not going to be enough, you need to make a lot more hay out of Southron atrocities and seriously minimize the northern ones.

But that still won't be enough, you have you makethe North a great deal more liberal and open toward african americans than it actually was and have more officers like Colonel RObert Gould Shaw and fewer contraband units.

In othe words make the Regiments of Colored Troops for the most part properly trained and decently treated, like the 54th, not ragamuffin troops like the glorified slaves of men mlike theJayhawkers.

Mass executions down south for colored POW's would go a long way toward making COnfederate nostalgia a really odiious thing.
__________________
I find no relevence to your identity regarding the humore in this location."--Lawrence, the telecomunications profesional
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old April 16th, 2012, 12:46 AM
GeorgeUK GeorgeUK is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 286
Alternatively, have the North win the war a lot quicker.

This happens in "The Union Forever". Lincoln doesn't get assassinated, is able to rebuild the South, and the author hinted at Jefferson Davis "writing a lament on the folly of secession" or something along those lines.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old April 16th, 2012, 12:54 AM
SergeantHeretic SergeantHeretic is offline
Eternal student of history
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Dothan, Alabama
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeorgeUK View Post
Alternatively, have the North win the war a lot quicker.

This happens in "The Union Forever". Lincoln doesn't get assassinated, is able to rebuild the South, and the author hinted at Jefferson Davis "writing a lament on the folly of secession" or something along those lines.
Interesting, I'l have to look that up.

What I always found interesting is that President Lincoln never planned on forcing the issue of slavery.

But the paranoia on the part of the Seccesion movement literally created the seccesion crisis, despite Lincoln's statement that, and I wuote,

"If I can restore the Union by freeing the slaves then free they will be, but if I can secure the Union by leaving slavery intact, then in their chains they shall remain."
__________________
I find no relevence to your identity regarding the humore in this location."--Lawrence, the telecomunications profesional
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old April 16th, 2012, 03:10 AM
Sean Mulligan Sean Mulligan is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 766
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ace Venom View Post
It's pretty simple. Have the Federal government consider the display of Confederate symbols a crime following the ACW. It would have also made a dent if all Confederate politicians and officers were executed for treason and anyone who continued to support the Confederacy after the war would have been considered a traitor. The Federal government could have also ruled that Confederate veterans would be ineligible to ever receive pensions because they fought against their country. Then the Federal government could have stepped in and banned any Confederate veterans organizations. It's a bit harsh, but I think it would have sent the message.

Killing the officers of the Army of Northern Virginia would violate Grants terms of surrender.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old April 16th, 2012, 03:13 AM
SergeantHeretic SergeantHeretic is offline
Eternal student of history
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Dothan, Alabama
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean Mulligan View Post
Killing the officers of the Army of Northern Virginia would violate Grants terms of surrender.
Yes, it would and the point is to make the CONFEDERATE forces look like crap not the other way around.
__________________
I find no relevence to your identity regarding the humore in this location."--Lawrence, the telecomunications profesional
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old April 16th, 2012, 03:13 AM
Snake Featherston Snake Featherston is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Lake Charles, Louisiana
Posts: 1000 or more
Have the Civil War end earlier with an inglorious Confederate defeat.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old April 16th, 2012, 03:17 AM
Snake Featherston Snake Featherston is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Lake Charles, Louisiana
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by SergeantHeretic View Post
You want to make the display of the stars and bars and Confederate Nostalgia be frowned on and disaproved of?

Simple, as another poster said, don't let the lost causers have free reign post war but that's not going to be enough, you need to make a lot more hay out of Southron atrocities and seriously minimize the northern ones.

But that still won't be enough, you have you makethe North a great deal more liberal and open toward african americans than it actually was and have more officers like Colonel RObert Gould Shaw and fewer contraband units.

In othe words make the Regiments of Colored Troops for the most part properly trained and decently treated, like the 54th, not ragamuffin troops like the glorified slaves of men mlike theJayhawkers.

Mass executions down south for colored POW's would go a long way toward making COnfederate nostalgia a really odiious thing.
That last bit actually happened a lot in the Civil War. To really avert the Lost Cause, as the CS Army was a morally bankrupt bunch of murderous thugs IOTL, you need the war to end very much sooner than it did.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old April 16th, 2012, 03:27 AM
SergeantHeretic SergeantHeretic is offline
Eternal student of history
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Dothan, Alabama
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snake Featherston View Post
That last bit actually happened a lot in the Civil War. To really avert the Lost Cause, as the CS Army was a morally bankrupt bunch of murderous thugs IOTL, you need the war to end very much sooner than it did.
Yeah, I didn't know about the last bit, really? they really did that?

Holy crap.

I always knew the "The War was for States rights" crap was as General John Berringer would say "A load of shit".

If they were fightring for "States Rights" what were they doing sending bands of murdering thugs into Kanas and Missouri to make sure those States voted to approve slavery?

Even today the cry of "States rights" is made a hollow sham by out os state political action gangs being sent into states voting or consideringvoting in favor or gay marriage to make sure they vote the "Right" Way.

States rights my aunt fanny, these backward bullying thugs want the right to opress and abuse and bully people and they're darned if they want to be told it's wrong.
__________________
I find no relevence to your identity regarding the humore in this location."--Lawrence, the telecomunications profesional
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old April 16th, 2012, 03:34 AM
Jello_Biafra Jello_Biafra is offline
In ur means of production...
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Earth, to my misfortune
Posts: 1000 or more
Send a message via MSN to Jello_Biafra
Make the rewards for compliance significant, and the penalties for resistance harsh.

Give the elites a narrative that strengthens their position, but requires them to make a break with the legacy of Confederacy.

That's pretty much the key to pushing through ideological change in any state superstructure, and can be cross-applied just about anywhere. If removing the superstructure is not feasible, it must be co-opted.

Reconstruction sought to remove the superstructure, but was not applied as thoroughly or as long as necessary. But even then, a restructuring of the Southern ideological superstructure was not impossible.
__________________
The Great Crusade (Reds! Part 3)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Georgepatton View Post
There's an appropriate amount of sexualiztion for Hitler?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old April 16th, 2012, 03:38 AM
SergeantHeretic SergeantHeretic is offline
Eternal student of history
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Dothan, Alabama
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jello_Biafra View Post
Make the rewards for compliance significant, and the penalties for resistance harsh.

Give the elites a narrative that strengthens their position, but requires them to make a break with the legacy of Confederacy.

That's pretty much the key to pushing through ideological change in any state superstructure, and can be cross-applied just about anywhere. If removing the superstructure is not feasible, it must be co-opted.

Reconstruction sought to remove the superstructure, but was not applied as thoroughly or as long as necessary. But even then, a restructuring of the Southern ideological superstructure was not impossible.
Prevent the rise of the DixieCrats!
__________________
I find no relevence to your identity regarding the humore in this location."--Lawrence, the telecomunications profesional
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old April 16th, 2012, 03:55 AM
Snake Featherston Snake Featherston is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Lake Charles, Louisiana
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by SergeantHeretic View Post
Yeah, I didn't know about the last bit, really? they really did that?

Holy crap.

I always knew the "The War was for States rights" crap was as General John Berringer would say "A load of shit".

If they were fightring for "States Rights" what were they doing sending bands of murdering thugs into Kanas and Missouri to make sure those States voted to approve slavery?

Even today the cry of "States rights" is made a hollow sham by out os state political action gangs being sent into states voting or consideringvoting in favor or gay marriage to make sure they vote the "Right" Way.

States rights my aunt fanny, these backward bullying thugs want the right to opress and abuse and bully people and they're darned if they want to be told it's wrong.
Yes. Fort Pillow is just the most notorious instance. The largest was in the Battle of the Crater, conducted by Lee's army.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old April 16th, 2012, 04:18 AM
SergeantHeretic SergeantHeretic is offline
Eternal student of history
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Dothan, Alabama
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snake Featherston View Post
Yes. Fort Pillow is just the most notorious instance. The largest was in the Battle of the Crater, conducted by Lee's army.
SO much for the legend of "Gentleman General Lee.
__________________
I find no relevence to your identity regarding the humore in this location."--Lawrence, the telecomunications profesional
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old April 16th, 2012, 05:21 AM
PhilippeO PhilippeO is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 308
Can this be done with POD after 1950 ? refusal of southern white to serve with black troops in Korea ? longer and more violent opposition to civil rights movement ? anti-segregation activist managed to kill President or commit mcveigh scale attack ? Dixiecrat success led to establishment of third party that popular in South only ?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old April 16th, 2012, 05:37 AM
thekingsguard thekingsguard is offline
Founder of Korsgaardianism
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Virginia - near the USA-CSSA Border
Posts: 1000 or more
1) Stop the romantiscation of Southern culture, like Gone With the Wind

2) Eliminate the Lost Cause folks from writing Civil War histories
__________________
My website, Korsgaard's Commentary.
Read my work, comment, and share it and come again! Now on YouTube!

Communist Confederacy Disscussion
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.