|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
Germany and Poland have two similar enemies, communism. The best bet is a more aggressive Soviet Union and/or a milder Germany.
__________________
Be ashamed to die until you have won some victory for humanity. Horace Mann |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
So, so far it seems that a bit of give and take, from both sides, it could of happened.
|
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Less than that, just Poland signing up to Anti-Comintern in 1935 and they’re away; they operated as de facto allies with regard to Austria, Czechoslovakia and Lithuania anyway.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hitler could never allow East Prussia to be territorially separated from the rest of Germany. Poland would never give up access to the sea via the Corridor. For an alliance to happen, Poland would need a new Corridor to the sea. Perhaps Hitler would allow Poland to annex Lithuania or would force the Lithuanians into confederation with Poland? The Poles would gladly give up Gdynia in exchange for Lithuania.
|
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is that why his first foreign treaty was with Poland confirming the existing border and normalising relations?
__________________
Quote:
|
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The idea that Lithuanian ports could have been a viable replacement for a corridor to the Danzig region seems to pop up in just about every thread about interwar Poland lately. It looks good on a map, but there was no infrastructure allowing Poland to even begin channelling its trade in that direction, and of course no viable seaports in Lithuania. Once Hitler gets his hands on Memel, only tiny fishing villages are left. Last edited by Zaius; February 4th, 2012 at 09:32 AM.. |
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
There was a Polish Lithuanian Commonwealth for about 200 years, would this count for anything by this point in time?
|
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
Another thing I have thought about. Wouldn't Poland have been better off ecnomically. With German industry and Poland's raw materials the money comming and going both ways be more important than just land swapping?
|
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Potentially. However, trust is the problem. Poland doesn’t trust Germany not to pressure or exploit them as there is little reason for Germany to pursue an alliance on equal terms.
__________________
Magnificate's DeviantART gallery |
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Would that, again, convince the Poles, the Finns, the Baltic folks, the Rumanians and other Eastern European folks that the greater threat from the Soviet Union in the short-run over the loss of territory, cities, minerals and folks on those lands being demanded by Russia override any concern that they would have from Germany whom would likewise be concern that Soviet demands from their Eastern Neighbor's lands would be perceive as a possible threat to launch Soviet Troops closer toward Germany instead of buffer zones to eat up the military strength of Germany if they had planned to launch an invasion against them... meh... |
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
|
Could a Trotskyite USSR scare Germany and Poland enough for an alliance?
__________________
Still haven't changed my opinion |
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
|
Depends on the Soviet Unions attitude towards Germany and Poland. If Trotsky stays true to hid ideas of permanent revolution and war communism, ignores the Rapallo treaty and is generally hostile towards both Germany and Poland, then it just might happen - with Germany using the red scare in Europe to abolish Versailles terms and create an all-european anti-communist bloc with Poland as well.
|
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|