Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Books and Media

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #961  
Old June 16th, 2012, 07:13 PM
Turquoise Blue Turquoise Blue is offline
Kicked
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Wales, Britain, EU.
Posts: 1000 or more
To summarize Abhakhazia's post...

Underlined is major party

1796-1820: Federalist/Democratic-Republican
1824-1832: National Republican/Democratic
1840-1852: Whig/Liberty/Democratic
1856-1872: Republican/Democratic
1876-1876: Republican/Greenback/Democratic
1880-1884: Republican/Greenback/Democratic
1888-1896: Republican/Democratic
1900-1908:
Socialist/Republican/Democratic
1912-1924: Progressive/Socialist/Republican/Democratic
1928-1996: Democratic/Republican
2000-20??.: Democratic/Republican/Green
__________________
Come and contribute to American Commonwealth!
Enter a new age in Dawn: A Fantasy-Reality RP!
Can you hope for a bright future? The Audacity of Hope.

Last edited by Turquoise Blue; June 16th, 2012 at 10:51 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #962  
Old June 16th, 2012, 07:14 PM
Wendell Wendell is offline
Panned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lost in what might have been
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deano1001 View Post
I'm kind of excited to write a detailed long ATL of TTL.
You will have quite a feat ahead of you. Has it been established whether or not the electoral college and FPTP must survive in this timeline?
__________________
What if?
Reply With Quote
  #963  
Old June 16th, 2012, 07:14 PM
Stolengood Stolengood is online now
Premium Blend
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evan View Post
because I plan to vote for whichever one of Bush or Perot is leading against Clinton. (We need to end the one-party executive!)
Vote for Perot! He needs your vote!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Meadow View Post
We're discussing alternate history. The whole basis of this subject is thesis and argument combined with fact.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleetlord View Post
Oh my god, did we break Spain?
Reply With Quote
  #964  
Old June 16th, 2012, 07:23 PM
Fleetlord Fleetlord is offline
A Drop of Fuel for A Nightmare
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: In a haze of green and gold
Posts: 984
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turquoise Blue View Post
To summarize Abhakhazia's post...

Underlined is major party

1796-1820: Federalist/Democratic-Republican
1824-1832: National Republican/Democratic
1840-1852: Whig/Liberty/Democratic
1856-1872: Republican/Democratic
1876-1876: Republican/Greenback/Democratic
1880-1884: Republican/Greenback/Democratic
1888-1896: Republican/Democratic
1900-1908:
Socialist/Republican/Democratic
1912-1928: Progressive/Socialist/Republican/Democratic
1928-1996: Democratic/Republican
2000-20??.: Democratic/Republican/Green
I'm not sure the Democrats deserve to be called a major party until 1928.
__________________
Control the nation's destiny in the Election Day Game!
Politics, as the world burns:
Reply With Quote
  #965  
Old June 16th, 2012, 07:26 PM
Turquoise Blue Turquoise Blue is offline
Kicked
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Wales, Britain, EU.
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleetlord View Post
I'm not sure the Democrats deserve to be called a major party until 1928.
Grover Cleveland, remember? And the one after him, William Jennings Bryan, is a Populist, so they might win an election, or at least get enough to be a major party.
__________________
Come and contribute to American Commonwealth!
Enter a new age in Dawn: A Fantasy-Reality RP!
Can you hope for a bright future? The Audacity of Hope.
Reply With Quote
  #966  
Old June 16th, 2012, 08:28 PM
Dean501 Dean501 is offline
Go Yankees
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Somewhere in an alternate Ottoman Empire
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wendell View Post
You will have quite a feat ahead of you. Has it been established whether or not the electoral college and FPTP must survive in this timeline?
IIRC Nerdlinger said that there will be some type of TL competition after this. Or maybe we can do it collaboratively.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by danishroll View Post
yes women we send women to fight trenchs of europe
Quote:
Originally Posted by Porthos View Post
I grew up during Reagan's America.
Never. Again.
Economic score: -4.13, Social score: -5.04
Reply With Quote
  #967  
Old June 16th, 2012, 08:58 PM
Evan Evan is offline
Free Hawaii!
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: The United States of America
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deano1001 View Post
I'm kind of excited to write a detailed long ATL of TTL.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deano1001 View Post
IIRC Nerdlinger said that there will be some type of TL competition after this. Or maybe we can do it collaboratively.
Yes - I'd be very excited to write one too!

I've even got a title: The Slaughterers of Butterflies: A Retroverse TL
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian the Admin View Post
I'm not going to make an encyclopedic list of groups which it's definitely not OK to be bigoted against, just in case people aren't sure.
Reply With Quote
  #968  
Old June 16th, 2012, 09:26 PM
JSmith JSmith is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Littleton Colorado
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abhakhazia View Post
On the Party systems.....

1. The Democratic-Republican party emerges as opposition to the Federalists. Both slowly erode.
2. The conservative wing of the DR Party becomes the Democratic Party, the rest with most Federalists becomes the National Republicans and then Whigs. Strong anti-slavery movements occur. The Democrats become a minor party. The Liberty Party comes off the Whigs, The Free Soilers off the Democrats. The Democrats become a tiny party. The most Whigs either become Liberties or Free Soilers. The remainder becomes the Know Nothing Party.
3. The Liberties and the Free Soilers unite under John Fremont and the new Republican Party, winning in the Landslide of 1856. The Republican Party has almost no opposition until about 1870 when a liberal group called the Greebacks present opposition. The Democrats continue to shrink.
4. The Greenback Party splits into the Progressives and the Socialists, on far left, the other centre-left. The Republicans slide toward Conservatism and weaken slightly. The economic crash also crashes the Socialist, and the Progressives who it happened under, leading them to the tiny, weak Democratic Party.
5. The Democrats swing with their new members to the left, dominating politics for 6 straight terms. The new Democrats, former Socialist Al Smith and former Progressive Franklin Roosevelt, fix the economy and progress under the Second World War, bringing America to victory. The Republicans suffered only gaining the Presidency under war hero Dwight D. Eisenhower, who barely won against popular Illinois senator Adlai Stevenson. The Democrats continue to win after severly bashing the former VP Richard Nixon three times, 2 of the three were very close until popular Michigan Senator Gerald Ford secures himself a term. After that, it looks like the Democrats will continue to dominate American politics, but there were serious challenges from the independent Ross Perot and the Republican George Bush, Snr.
This blurb is a great overview for a timeline.
__________________
How do I define history? It's just one fuckin' thing after another.
Reply With Quote
  #969  
Old June 16th, 2012, 10:22 PM
snerfuplz snerfuplz is offline
Liveral Fascist
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleetlord View Post
I'm not sure the Democrats deserve to be called a major party until 1928.
This could be useful for any future TL. One could have the Democrats only begin to win votes by fusing with the old Socialist Party and Progressive Party.
__________________
My Sad City: http://snerfu.myminicity.com/
Reply With Quote
  #970  
Old June 16th, 2012, 10:23 PM
OAM47 OAM47 is offline
POTUS - AAR
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: IL
Posts: 1000 or more
Send a message via MSN to OAM47
This is my best guess for 1876. Granted, I gave prohibition states for fun, really, and they could go rep. Greenbacks can lose 4 EV before it gets thrown to the house.

__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by modelcitizen View Post
Removing the Soviet Union from fiction is like removing sesame or poppy seeds from a bagel. It's just... I dunno.
Reply With Quote
  #971  
Old June 16th, 2012, 10:29 PM
snerfuplz snerfuplz is offline
Liveral Fascist
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 1000 or more
The rule of thumb should be Prohibition states are hard to achieve with large immigrant populations because they frowned upon the concept
__________________
My Sad City: http://snerfu.myminicity.com/
Reply With Quote
  #972  
Old June 16th, 2012, 10:45 PM
Abhakhazia Abhakhazia is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: The Sangamon Valley Republic
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deano1001 View Post
I'm kind of excited to write a detailed long ATL of TTL.
Well, my post will help you out. I'd love if I could collebrate.

Last edited by Abhakhazia; June 16th, 2012 at 10:57 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #973  
Old June 16th, 2012, 10:50 PM
Abhakhazia Abhakhazia is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: The Sangamon Valley Republic
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turquoise Blue View Post
To summarize Abhakhazia's post...

Underlined is major party

1796-1820: Federalist/Democratic-Republican
1824-1832: National Republican/Democratic
1840-1852: Whig/Liberty/Democratic
1856-1872: Republican/Democratic
1876-1876: Republican/Greenback/Democratic
1880-1884: Republican/Greenback/Democratic
1888-1896: Republican/Democratic
1900-1908:
Socialist/Republican/Democratic
1912-1928: Progressive/Socialist/Republican/Democratic
1928-1996: Democratic/Republican
2000-20??.: Democratic/Republican/Green
Not really. It was for my own party system back there.
For a long time Democrats were the Constitution Party equivalent- standing on the right, not doing much, until the collapse of the SP and PP, which slammed them left.
Reply With Quote
  #974  
Old June 16th, 2012, 11:33 PM
metastasis_d metastasis_d is offline
Full Battle Rattle
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Texas occupied Missouri
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wendell View Post
You will have quite a feat ahead of you. Has it been established whether or not the electoral college and FPTP must survive in this timeline?
I don't think either of those necessarily have to survive in a TL based on the election results, but if you wanted say to have IRV elections in your TL you'd probably have to skew the results on some of them. Then again, unless you plan to personally ask everyone what their 2nd, 3rd, etm. choices would have been in each retrospective election, you're going to have to take some liberties with them anyway if you're gonna go IRV.
__________________
Basemap
Reply With Quote
  #975  
Old June 16th, 2012, 11:42 PM
QuoProQuid QuoProQuid is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by OAM47 View Post
This is my best guess for 1876. Granted, I gave prohibition states for fun, really, and they could go rep. Greenbacks can lose 4 EV before it gets thrown to the house.

My version of the map:



After realizing that the election is on course to the House, a Prohibition Elector in New Hampshire defects to the Greenbacks. Electoral College reform gets pushed through as a consequence.
Reply With Quote
  #976  
Old June 17th, 2012, 12:51 AM
Glen Glen is offline
Moderator & Left Hand of IAN
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 1000 or more
1789 - George Washington (Non-Partisan)
1792 - George Washington (Non-Partisan)
1796 - John Adams (Federalist)
1800 - John Adams (Federalist)
1804 - Thomas Jefferson (Democratic-Republican)
1808 - Charles Pinckney (Federalist)
1812 - James Madison (Democratic-Republican)
1816 - Rufus King (Federalist)
1820 - DeWitt Clinton (Independent)
1824 - John Quincy Adams (National-Republican)
1828 - John Quincy Adams (National-Republican)
1832 - Henry Clay (National Republican)
1836 - Daniel Webster (Whig)
1840 - James Birney (Liberty)
1844 - Henry Clay (Whig)
1848 - Gerrit Smith (Liberty)
1852 - Winfield Scott (Whig)
1856 - John Fremont (Republican)
1860 - Abraham Lincoln (Republican)
1864 - Abraham Lincoln (Republican)
1868 - Ulysses Grant (Republican)
1872 - Ulysses Grant (Republican)
1876 - Peter Cooper (Greenback)

1900 - Eugene Debs (Socialist)
1904 - Theodore Roosevelt (Republican)
1908 - Eugene Debs (Socialist)
1912 - Theodore Roosevelt (Progressive)
1916 - Charles Hughes (Republican)
1920 - Eugene Debs (Socialist)
1924 - Robert La Follette (Progressive)
1928 - Al Smith (Democrat)
1932 - Franklin Roosevelt (Democrat)
1936 - Franklin Roosevelt (Democrat)
1940 - Franklin Roosevelt (Democrat)
1944 - Franklin Roosevelt (Democrat)
1948 - Harry Truman (Democrat)
1952 - Dwight Eisenhower (Republican)
1956 - Dwight Eisenhower (Republican)
1960 - John Kennedy (Democrat)
1964 - Lyndon Johnson (Democrat)
1968 - Hubert Humphrey (Democrat)
1972 - George McGovern (Democrat)
1976 - Gerald Ford (Republican)
1980 - James Carter (Democrat)
1984 - Walter Mondale (Democrat)
1988 - Michael Dukakis (Democrat)
__________________
Sarah - That would cause a very big change in the space-time continuum.
Turtledove Winning Dominion of Southern America & Nike!
Reply With Quote
  #977  
Old June 17th, 2012, 01:03 AM
Abhakhazia Abhakhazia is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: The Sangamon Valley Republic
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by metastasis_d View Post
I don't think either of those necessarily have to survive in a TL based on the election results, but if you wanted say to have IRV elections in your TL you'd probably have to skew the results on some of them. Then again, unless you plan to personally ask everyone what their 2nd, 3rd, etm. choices would have been in each retrospective election, you're going to have to take some liberties with them anyway if you're gonna go IRV.
Also, it'd be a lot easier to just have a TL with the winning candidates than the winning and losing candidates.
Reply With Quote
  #978  
Old June 17th, 2012, 01:12 AM
metastasis_d metastasis_d is offline
Full Battle Rattle
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Texas occupied Missouri
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abhakhazia View Post
Also, it'd be a lot easier to just have a TL with the winning candidates than the winning and losing candidates.
True enough, it would be easier. A lot more flexibility.
__________________
Basemap
Reply With Quote
  #979  
Old June 17th, 2012, 01:53 AM
Paul V McNutt Paul V McNutt is offline
Paul V McNutt
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1000 or more
A TL has to overcome considerable ASB, like Birney winning. This is an exercise in us imposing 2012 standards on the past.
Reply With Quote
  #980  
Old June 17th, 2012, 02:11 AM
Nerdlinger Nerdlinger is offline
The nerd formerly known as DJC
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Anywhere but here
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleetlord View Post
Should be:
4 (2/4): John Adams / Charles C. Pinckney (Federalist) March 4, 1801 - March 4, 1805

Sorry, it's just been bugging me.
Ah, hell. It was 3 because it used to be Jefferson in the list there. Thanks for the catch.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cambyses The Mad View Post
Jedi to Hitler: "These aren't the Jews you're looking for."
Rebs, Reds, and the Race
Worldwar: Out of Balance
Star Wars: Point of Divergence
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.