Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Discussion: After 1900

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #6701  
Old June 19th, 2012, 03:37 PM
Gannt the chartist Gannt the chartist is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 834
Who is the MacArthur guy anyway?

Why would MacArthur be put in charge of what is likely to be for a good while yet a mainly CW operation based on Dutch territory with the principle mission (CW version) being the forward defence of India and Australia.

While Mac may be a big deal in the US to the rest of the world he is just an overage relic of WW1 - with limited combat experience (compared with his peers) and the guy that has monumentally screwed up the defence of the PI with a tendency to shoot strikers. An overage relic of WW1 who cant handle modern warfare. Lord Gort but not as successful.

I still think its more likely that Marshall will use this as an excuse to lower US troop commitment to the Pacific (those two NG divs) let the Navy fight its war and build up in Europe earlier.
Reply With Quote
  #6702  
Old June 19th, 2012, 05:52 PM
Garrison Garrison is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1000 or more
Leaving aside the merits of MacArthur OTL I just can't see him being given theatre command ITTL. Are the British and Australians really going to sign up for a man whose command has been overrun, with no small part of the blame falling on poor leadership, while they have been pounding the Japanese at every opportunity. Not to mention that US forces are a bit thin on the ground at present. I just can't see it happening unless there's going to be some serious political pressure from Washington.
Reply With Quote
  #6703  
Old June 19th, 2012, 06:16 PM
Faralis Faralis is offline
Sometimes is Capt Obvious
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by ModernKiwi View Post
First of all, signed up just to say that I think this is an excellent alt timeline and I am quite enjoying it.

From reading between the lines of some of SE Morrison's work, I got the impression that King thought that way after a couple of unescorted British convoys got worked over badly during the BoB panic when all the destroyers were held back to protect the UK.

In this timeline with less of an invasion panic and so more escorts being available, it would be entirely possible that this never happened and so King never forms that opinion.
This is interesting, King was mildly Anglophobe, but he was no idiot.
Reply With Quote
  #6704  
Old June 19th, 2012, 06:17 PM
Astrodragon Astrodragon is offline
Coffee-seeking Dragon
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: UK - Oxfordshire
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Faralis View Post
This is interesting, King was mildly Anglophobe, but he was no idiot.
No he wasn't.
he was STRONGLY Anglophobic.
__________________
The Whale Has Wings, a shiny new Fleet Air Arm in WW2. Timelines go better with Whales...
http://www.astrodragon.co.uk/Books/TheWhaleHasWings.htm
Reply With Quote
  #6705  
Old June 19th, 2012, 06:29 PM
Devolved Devolved is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Astrodragon View Post
No he wasn't.
he was STRONGLY Anglophobic.
Most senior officers in the US navy were Anglophobic I think. Admiral Halsey (The idiot who charged into traps and typhoons) springs to mind. I think it's because when most of them were younger the RN was the chief rival and many were annoyed at British arrogance.
Reply With Quote
  #6706  
Old June 19th, 2012, 07:13 PM
AgentOrange AgentOrange is offline
Rainbow Herbicide
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 202
...or American jealousy.
__________________
Kundama - Toll
Reply With Quote
  #6707  
Old June 19th, 2012, 07:20 PM
Faralis Faralis is offline
Sometimes is Capt Obvious
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Astrodragon View Post
No he wasn't.
he was STRONGLY Anglophobic.
I should have used

EDIT: DoesnŽt matter, Its your story, so IŽll see how that bit ends
Reply With Quote
  #6708  
Old June 19th, 2012, 07:54 PM
Expat Expat is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1000 or more
This continues to be an enjoyable and thorough TL.

Malaya seems awfully quiet right now. I understand the offensive isn't scheduled until the next convoy arrives, but they're not just sitting on their hands, surely?

Are those German pockets being resupplied by air OTL or are we seeing the results of fewer planes supplying North Africa?

Btw, to all of you from the Blessed Plot commenting on this thread, this is how I'm picturing you.
Reply With Quote
  #6709  
Old June 19th, 2012, 08:24 PM
MattII MattII is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 1000 or more
North Africa? There's not a German left in North Africa except in a POW camp.
Reply With Quote
  #6710  
Old June 19th, 2012, 08:26 PM
Expat Expat is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1000 or more
Sorry, are the German pockets *in Russia* supplied by air by planes now available because there is no African front, or was the *Russian* re-supply OTL?
Reply With Quote
  #6711  
Old June 19th, 2012, 08:44 PM
sonofpegasus sonofpegasus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 166
With North Africa done and dusted the situation in Russia is changed, The Luftwaffe is not being bled of transport aircraft and at least two Luftflotte of bombers will not be diverted from the Russian front. Also of course no Tigers sent to Tunisia, so the first time the Western Allies will meet them is when they land on mainland Europe. Now that could be a very nasty surprise. How much the extra material will effect the 1942 Russian front capaign only AD knows!
Reply With Quote
  #6712  
Old June 19th, 2012, 08:45 PM
Paulo the Limey Paulo the Limey is offline
Frog blast the vent core!
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: London!
Posts: 609
Quote:
Originally Posted by Expat View Post
Sorry, are the German pockets *in Russia* supplied by air by planes now available because there is no African front, or was the *Russian* re-supply OTL?
I'm fairly sure that the pockets were from OTL- the successful supply of these pockets went some way to convince Hitler that the later, larger pocket of 6th Army at Stalingrad. Whoopsie
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CalBear View Post
Arguing on the Internet is just about the greatest waste of time I can imagine.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian the Admin View Post
SHUT UP ABOUT PONIES.
Reply With Quote
  #6713  
Old June 19th, 2012, 09:47 PM
Astrodragon Astrodragon is offline
Coffee-seeking Dragon
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: UK - Oxfordshire
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulo the Limey View Post
I'm fairly sure that the pockets were from OTL- the successful supply of these pockets went some way to convince Hitler that the later, larger pocket of 6th Army at Stalingrad. Whoopsie
they are indeed OTL, but the Luftwaffe does have a few more transport planes available, so its a little easier.
__________________
The Whale Has Wings, a shiny new Fleet Air Arm in WW2. Timelines go better with Whales...
http://www.astrodragon.co.uk/Books/TheWhaleHasWings.htm
Reply With Quote
  #6714  
Old June 19th, 2012, 10:03 PM
Obfuscated Obfuscated is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 425
Quote:
Originally Posted by Astrodragon View Post
they are indeed OTL, but the Luftwaffe does have a few more transport planes available, so its a little easier.
That reminds me, ME-Goliaths exist in this timeline ?

Those planes orignally suffered some horrific losses doing africa supply runs OTL but did quite well by accounts on the Eastern Front - less enemy fighters to utterly murder them.

ME-Goliaths are gliders. Wooden gliders. Gigantic wooden gliders. Functionally closer to a Hercules or Galaxy than the typical one use WW2 glider they suffered from being a) huge wooden boxes, b) as agile as a railcannon c) non-expendable meant being restricted to airfields where the tow planes could operate.

The tow-planes ? You know the Twin Mustang ? Well, the germans had the Twin He-111 and tried for a Triple He-111. Because they could use only two Triple instead of three Twins to tow a Goliath.
(And because the He-111 was relativly shitty so the frames could be spared, but the tow arrangement for six planes was a bit much even gor germans.)
Reply With Quote
  #6715  
Old June 19th, 2012, 10:23 PM
wietze wietze is offline
Figment of my own Imagination
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Just south of Frisian Islands
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Obfuscated View Post
That reminds me, ME-Goliaths exist in this timeline ?

ME-Goliaths are gliders. Wooden gliders. Gigantic wooden gliders. Functionally closer to a Hercules or Galaxy than the typical one use WW2 glider they suffered from being a) huge wooden boxes, b) as agile as a railcannon c) non-expendable meant being restricted to airfields where the tow planes could operate.
so they still might come up with them, and also with the version with engines.

glider: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messerschmitt_Me_321
motorised: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messerschmitt_Me_323

edit:reading the wiki article on the 323 makes you go , the 323Z zwilling version carrying a 17.7 (metric) tonne bomb is just mindblowing (thats 39K lb).
__________________
- AH.com where every writer is better than harry harrison -

Last edited by wietze; June 19th, 2012 at 10:33 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #6716  
Old June 19th, 2012, 10:53 PM
Wet Coast Wet Coast is offline
Knight of the Dinner Table
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 284
Quote:
Originally Posted by ModernKiwi View Post
First of all, signed up just to say that I think this is an excellent alt timeline and I am quite enjoying it.

From reading between the lines of some of SE Morrison's work, I got the impression that King thought that way after a couple of unescorted British convoys got worked over badly during the BoB panic when all the destroyers were held back to protect the UK.

In this timeline with less of an invasion panic and so more escorts being available, it would be entirely possible that this never happened and so King never forms that opinion.
Actually some of the blame for the convoy issues should rightly be assigned to Admiral Adolphus Stevens, the commander of the North Atlantic Costal Frontier (later the Eastern Sea Frontier).

The intial British warnings, based upon intercepts, indicating that UBoats were comming were sent to his command. It was Stevens who then decided that an unescorted convoy was just a big target, in contravention of all prior experience, and chose not to organize convoys. When he did manage to get some escorts to work with he sent them to patrol the shipping lanes instead of assigning them to convoys.

The whole convoy issue was greater than just one man. There were command structure issues, a general antipathy towards the RN at senior levels and a disregard of intelligence officers and "operational research".
Reply With Quote
  #6717  
Old June 19th, 2012, 11:26 PM
ModernKiwi ModernKiwi is offline
1% more
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: The only real city in NZ
Posts: 528
Quote:
Originally Posted by Astrodragon View Post
No he wasn't.
he was STRONGLY Anglophobic.
I thought the British thought he hated them, only to be told that it wasn't just them, he hated everyone...
Reply With Quote
  #6718  
Old June 20th, 2012, 12:20 AM
LegionoftheUnitedStates LegionoftheUnitedStates is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gannt the chartist View Post
Lord Gort but not as successful.
Now why did you have to insult Lord Gort like that?
Reply With Quote
  #6719  
Old June 20th, 2012, 01:18 AM
usertron2020 usertron2020 is offline
Tolstoyan
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by ModernKiwi View Post
I thought the British thought he hated them, only to be told that it wasn't just them, he hated everyone...
That's a lot closer to the truth. Hence my comment about King being so despised WITHIN the US Navy.

Last edited by usertron2020; June 20th, 2012 at 04:45 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #6720  
Old June 20th, 2012, 01:19 AM
usertron2020 usertron2020 is offline
Tolstoyan
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by LegionoftheUnitedStates View Post
Now why did you have to insult Lord Gort like that?
Because Gort wasn't exactly a credit to the British Race himself? At least, after 1940...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.