Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Discussion: After 1900

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #5901  
Old May 18th, 2012, 04:53 AM
StevoJH StevoJH is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Newcastle, NSW
Posts: 322
Quote:
Originally Posted by Astrodragon View Post
Somerville of course has his own problems, he has to keep Singapore covered, he cant sail all his carriers off unles KB is actually spotted. Both sides are worried about engaging in the DEI, there is lots of land based air around, the RN has to worry about Singapore, the IJN has to worry about the USN.
Expect lots of cautious manouvering unless one or the other sides thinks they have a clear advantage...
Doesnt Singapore now (or at least when the Fighters in the Convoy arrive) have enough RAF Assets on hand to allow Somerville to leave it uncovered?

You only need carriers if you don't have enough land based air.
Reply With Quote
  #5902  
Old May 18th, 2012, 05:34 AM
usertron2020 usertron2020 is offline
Tolstoyan
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattII View Post
@ Ramp Rat
Those trestle-bridges in America were built by people who wanted them to stay up and worked hard to get them just right. You think those Thais are going to put in the same effort for the Japanese? Or that even if they wanted to that the Japanese would allow them the time?

As for the trains, for 50 tons of load you're adding maybe another 10 tons or so of wagon. Also, how are you planning to pull a 60 ton railway wagon across a bridge? Throw a line across and get a team of elephants to pull it?
Anybody who has ever seen the movie "Bridge Over the River Kwai" knows the answers to all these questions.
Reply With Quote
  #5903  
Old May 18th, 2012, 05:55 AM
usertron2020 usertron2020 is offline
Tolstoyan
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by DD951 View Post
Not quite right about Boise playing no further role in the Pacific during the next 2 years- she was at Cape Esperance & scored several hits on the Japanese force before taking an underwater hit in the forward magazines from an 8" AP shell (probably from Kinugasa)- the only known instance of the diving shell trick working in combat- which caused much of the ammunition & powder to explode, wrecking the 3 forward turrets & causing a massive fire that burned out much of the forward part of the ship.
The Boise was lucky, as a treaty cruiser, to still be afloat after taking a Long Lance. She'll be in the dockyards for a long time to come.
Reply With Quote
  #5904  
Old May 18th, 2012, 06:20 AM
MattII MattII is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by usertron2020 View Post
Anybody who has ever seen the movie "Bridge Over the River Kwai" knows the answers to all these questions.
I don't know, the movie was considered insultingly inaccurate, especially in regards to the senior officer Philip Toosey. If you want an idea of what actually went on read One Fourteenth Of An Elephant by Ian Deny Peek. Basically, if the prisoners could have found a way to build the bridge even slower and make it even more rickety they would have done.
Reply With Quote
  #5905  
Old May 18th, 2012, 06:25 AM
DD951 DD951 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 700
Quote:
Originally Posted by usertron2020 View Post
The Boise was lucky, as a treaty cruiser, to still be afloat after taking a Long Lance. She'll be in the dockyards for a long time to come.
From what's in the damage analysis in Friedman's cruiser book & the histories of the ships in question, a US 10k-ton treaty cruiser should be able to survive a single Long Lance hit, assuming she doesn't suffer any other damage or run into really bad weather on the way to the yard, though it'll be 4-6 months in the yard repairing the damage; it's when one gets hit by 2 or more that survival becomes problematic.
Reply With Quote
  #5906  
Old May 18th, 2012, 07:30 AM
Astrodragon Astrodragon is online now
Coffee-seeking Dragon
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: UK - Oxfordshire
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by StevoJH View Post
Doesnt Singapore now (or at least when the Fighters in the Convoy arrive) have enough RAF Assets on hand to allow Somerville to leave it uncovered?

You only need carriers if you don't have enough land based air.
The problem for Somerville is that he has two axis of attacks to cover - through the South China Sea and along the DEI. A force at SIngapore can cover both, once one goes too far into the DEI it cannot cover the SCS nearly as easily.
Remember his remit is first to protect Singapore and Ceylon. Not the Dutch. He wants more intelligence before he does something risky.
__________________
The Whale Has Wings, a shiny new Fleet Air Arm in WW2. Timelines go better with Whales...
http://www.astrodragon.co.uk/Books/TheWhaleHasWings.htm
Reply With Quote
  #5907  
Old May 18th, 2012, 07:39 AM
usertron2020 usertron2020 is offline
Tolstoyan
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattII View Post
I don't know, the movie was considered insultingly inaccurate, especially in regards to the senior officer Philip Toosey. If you want an idea of what actually went on read One Fourteenth Of An Elephant by Ian Deny Peek. Basically, if the prisoners could have found a way to build the bridge even slower and make it even more rickety they would have done.
My bad. I should have been clearer. I was referring to the activities of the British PoWs in the early part of the film.
Reply With Quote
  #5908  
Old May 18th, 2012, 09:15 AM
StevoJH StevoJH is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Newcastle, NSW
Posts: 322
Quote:
Originally Posted by usertron2020 View Post
The Boise was lucky, as a treaty cruiser, to still be afloat after taking a Long Lance. She'll be in the dockyards for a long time to come.
What Torpedo's did the Japanese Submarines carry and how did they compare to the Long Lance?

HMAS Hobart after taking a Japanese submarine torpedo.
Reply With Quote
  #5909  
Old May 18th, 2012, 09:24 AM
Derek Pullem Derek Pullem is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 949
Quote:
Originally Posted by StevoJH View Post
What Torpedo's did the Japanese Submarines carry and how did they compare to the Long Lance?

HMAS Hobart after taking a Japanese submarine torpedo.
Probably done by a Type 95 which was a cut-down version of the long lance with shorter range and 80% of the warhead.
Reply With Quote
  #5910  
Old May 18th, 2012, 09:48 AM
Gannt the chartist Gannt the chartist is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 823
supplying burma

I think the tonnage requirements quoted are misleading.

Operation Thursday supplied 10,000 men and 1000 mules with 3 batteries each of field and light AA on 125 tons per day with an initial stock of 250 tons. That’s on a mix of British and Indian army scales.


IJA formations are bigger but I think something on the order of 200 - 250 tons per division day is reasonable for that sort of operational tempo. It would certainly cover food requirement. The problem will be ammo.


A US infantry division ammo requirement per day went from 83 tons per day in pursuit up to around 350 - 450 tons in attack and 470-770 in defence. a 155mm battalion uses 15 tons in pursuit to ~100+ tons in defence or attack.

Compared with OTL the IJA are moving from a largely pursuit type operation to one with more Attack/Defence rates which is going to blow their logs situation much faster than OTL. 1 day in attack = 30 days in pursuit. Apparently the IJA planning numbers were more or less the same as the USA planning numbers for supply. The above quoted is I think actual expenditure rates which may be very different but the principle remains valid.

They will also have been favouring ammo rather than food/fodder and POL supply for some days now just to maintain their level of activity.

In this context Stilleto has turned a dodgy ammunition situation into a near catastrophic one.

The final problem is The IJA have no WW1 experience to fall back on so their logs planning will be booklearning rather than real world and higher HQs will I think not believe Yamashita when he says he has problems.
Reply With Quote
  #5911  
Old May 18th, 2012, 10:03 AM
Simreeve Simreeve is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gannt the chartist View Post
The final problem is The IJA have no WW1 experience to fall back on so their logs planning will be booklearning rather than real world and higher HQs will I think not believe Yamashita when he says he has problems.
Might the figures for Port Arthur and Mukden have been a fairly reasonable substitute for WW1 values?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by VidaLaVida View Post
Of course, "more mentally stable than Ivan The Terrible" is not exactly an accomplishment.
Reply With Quote
  #5912  
Old May 18th, 2012, 10:08 AM
MattII MattII is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 1000 or more
Possibly from Mukden, but not much from Port Arthur due to the extra 10 years difference (even the most junior officers from Port Arthur are now in their mid 50s)
Reply With Quote
  #5913  
Old May 18th, 2012, 10:53 AM
RandomChance RandomChance is offline
A Statistical Anomaly
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Low Earth Orbit
Posts: 198
Quote:
Originally Posted by Derek Pullem View Post
Probably done by a Type 95 which was a cut-down version of the long lance with shorter range and 80% of the warhead.
Still a pretty hefty hitter. Lovely dent though. Give a few Aussies a couple of hammers and a crate of beer and they'll have that knocked out in a jiffy. Bonzer!
Reply With Quote
  #5914  
Old May 18th, 2012, 10:56 AM
Gannt the chartist Gannt the chartist is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 823
Possibly but my general understanding is that while the 1904/5 figures were a shock compared to pre war planning, WW1 was a shock compared to that and WW2 again.

But its possible. The real points though are these.

The supply requirement depends on what you are doing. Active attack or defense makes ammo supply the biggest portion. (the 'delay' line is a higher but on the same order as 'pursuit' I would read either as general daily consumption with low tempo operations)

Vs OTL expeditures I think there has been a massive increase because of the intensity of the fighting, so the crunch will come much much sooner.

If the IJA switches to a defensive posture their consumption increases if the UK/CW attack.

Any delay or request to pause is likely to cause questions at higher HQ over Yamashita's aggressiveness much like OTL with Homma with a high probability of him being replaced by a guy under orders to use use his men as Human Bullets and conquer Malaya right now.

Tenaru river/Edsons ridge on a corps scale?
Reply With Quote
  #5915  
Old May 18th, 2012, 11:40 AM
Gannt the chartist Gannt the chartist is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 823
correction possibly

the IJA planning number was 1/2 - 1/3 lower that the US equivalent, and based on Russo Japanese/China experience.

To give another idea - the Brits calculated that using 25lbers a morale attack (suppress the enemy fire during and for some time after the barrage) which reads like a barrage immediately prior to an infantry attack, would require 1,500 rounds delivered in 1 hour on a 100x100 yd target area. assume a 500 yd frontage that gives 7,500 rounds in an hour.

Thats arguably a UK/Ger or Russian Battalion attack frontage but you could get numbers that show 1000 yd as a battalion attack frontage.

an IJA division artillery component (not battalion and rgt guns) was allocated 48,000 rounds. Thats supposed to last 25 days fighting. You could use 1/3 of it in an hour to have an effect on a UK/CW company frontage in defence.

OK there are others ways with less ammo expenditure but I am making a point.
Reply With Quote
  #5916  
Old May 18th, 2012, 02:23 PM
Alcatur Alcatur is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 168
Quote:
The Boise was lucky, as a treaty cruiser, to still be afloat after taking a Long Lance. She'll be in the dockyards for a long time to come.
There was no instance of a treaty cruiser being sunk by a single Long Lance in WW2, or at least I cannot find any.
Reply With Quote
  #5917  
Old May 18th, 2012, 05:28 PM
Garrison Garrison is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Astrodragon View Post
The problem for Somerville is that he has two axis of attacks to cover - through the South China Sea and along the DEI. A force at SIngapore can cover both, once one goes too far into the DEI it cannot cover the SCS nearly as easily.
Remember his remit is first to protect Singapore and Ceylon. Not the Dutch. He wants more intelligence before he does something risky.
So when did the codebreakers really start getting into JN25? They had by the time of Coral Sea but is there any prospect of something useful being produced sooner?
Reply With Quote
  #5918  
Old May 18th, 2012, 05:58 PM
usertron2020 usertron2020 is offline
Tolstoyan
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alcatur View Post
There was no instance of a treaty cruiser being sunk by a single Long Lance in WW2, or at least I cannot find any.
There are arguments that go back and forth whether the Indianapolis was sunk by one torpedo (not a Long Lance). But are you saying ALL FIVE Allied heavy cruisers sunk at Savo Island received multiple hits? That's some shooting.
Reply With Quote
  #5919  
Old May 18th, 2012, 06:03 PM
usertron2020 usertron2020 is offline
Tolstoyan
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garrison View Post
So when did the codebreakers really start getting into JN25? They had by the time of Coral Sea but is there any prospect of something useful being produced sooner?
USN Hypo codebreakers were reading 10-15% of JN25 traffic by just before Coral Sea. Logistical difficulties delayed the IJN from changing over from JN25 until late May, resulting in a plethora of information pouring in on Japanese intentions. At this point in the war, the codebreakers are doing little more than guessing. However, I do not know about what TTL may have produced in British codebreaking efforts.
Reply With Quote
  #5920  
Old May 18th, 2012, 06:04 PM
Peg Leg Pom Peg Leg Pom is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Astrodragon View Post
The problem for Somerville is that he has two axis of attacks to cover - through the South China Sea and along the DEI. A force at SIngapore can cover both, once one goes too far into the DEI it cannot cover the SCS nearly as easily.
Remember his remit is first to protect Singapore and Ceylon. Not the Dutch. He wants more intelligence before he does something risky.
He can't ignore a threat to either Java or Sumatra. Sumatra can't be held without also holding Java and if Sumatra falls then Malaya will as well.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.