Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Discussion: Before 1900

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old January 24th, 2012, 03:45 PM
mrmandias mrmandias is offline
Regent
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 1000 or more
Oh, brother, Mike. Don't troll.
__________________
God and Spain, motherf***
-the Ninth Crusade
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old January 24th, 2012, 03:51 PM
Arachnid Arachnid is offline
Arachnid once more.
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1000 or more
Frankly that's drivel, there is a legitimate argument that Wellington wasn't the equal of Napoleon as some people claim but the idea that he was some kind of third rate Sepoy General is just silly. If you don't believe me look at Napoleon's genuine assessment of him, not morale boosting quips.

Also remember this, Wellington's abiding flaw was the he was overcautious, Napoleon's that he was a gambler. Wellington never lost army, Napoleon went all in numerous times, sometimes (Austerlitz) it paid off in style, on the hand first he lost his Nile Army, then he lost his Grande Army in Russia and then he gambled at Waterloo ending it all.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jape View Post
I would shudder at this but I can't get over Thande's insinuation there's a moderately popular Kinnock sex doll out there.

Last edited by Arachnid; January 24th, 2012 at 04:05 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old January 24th, 2012, 04:01 PM
Simon Simon is online now
Thread Killer Extraordinaire
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1000 or more
Which is kind of understandable as Napoleon had a large population base to raise replacement troops so up until his diastrous invasion of Russia he could get away with losing troops, the UK on the other hand would of had much greater trouble raising them if they lost (what were to them) large numbers of troops.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old January 24th, 2012, 05:50 PM
TyranicusMaximus TyranicusMaximus is offline
Irrational Statist
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Otto-wank Virginia
Posts: 959
Let's not derail this with Napoleon/Wellington bickering
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Georgepatton View Post
No wonder Israel has so many problems there: Southern Lebanon isn't kosher!
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old January 25th, 2012, 09:30 PM
corditeman corditeman is offline
Corditeman
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Dalbeattie, Scotland
Posts: 1000 or more
Red face My bad...

...A British Corsica would presumably have strong cheeser and stronger wine. In one Asterix book, a small ship is blown up after a pirate goes down into its hold and discovers an infernal Corsican cheese...
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old January 25th, 2012, 10:14 PM
Alamo Alamo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Northwest New Jersey
Posts: 318
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fabilius View Post
With a british Corsica Napoleon might be pretty pissed. HeŽd maybe invade out of pride.
Hmmm. According to Wikipedia, Napoleon was actually at first a strong supporter of Paoli. Depending on when the British take Corsica, and how, he might actually wind up serving in the Corsican forces, and thus on the side of the British.
__________________
An American Siberia timeline:
Two Follies: The History of Beringia Updated: 4/25/13
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.