|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Challenge: Alaskan Independence Party Becomes Dominant
With a POD after the 1990 gubernatorial election in which the AKIP candidate Walter Hickel was elected governor, have the AKIP become the dominant party in the state. It must still have advocating Alaskan secession as one of the main issues on its platform.
__________________
A Balkanized Mexico? Korean Taiwan? France and Germany Friends?! Union and Liberty (last updated May 16th). Now a Turtledove winner! |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
It would be fascinating to see how the modern United States deals with a popular, democratic seccessionist movement. After all didn't the ACW set a precedent that denied states the right to leave the Union?
No knowledgable enough but a fun idea that could become a major headache in the US doesn't handle it well. Might be harder to represent international democracy and freedom when you're "suppressing" such movements in your own backyard. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sarah Palin runs for the nomination. (Her husband was a member.)
__________________
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
I wonder how the Alaska-Russian war that might then occur go?
__________________
Ebil bocagist CONSPIRATOR! CMII I just published my second completed thread! Read more about the Fireflies of Port Stanley here. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
This is very interesting. Not only because of what Jape said, but also because while most of the major secessionist parties in the West are at the centre-left of the political spectrum (Bloc Quebecois, SNP, Plaid Cymru; the only one not left-wing that comes to my mind is the Basque PNV, which is Christian democrat), the AIP is, if Wiki is right, a very Tea Party-esque organization.
Very interesting. Since my knowledge of American politics (let alone Alaskan politics) is limited, let me ask a couple of questions in this scenario. Would it be possible to see an equally secessionist, but more to the left party (maybe an offshoot of the Alaska Democratic Party) appear? Would the sucess of the AIP lead to similar parties appear in other parts of the U.S.? |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Alaska would be foolish to leave the US as more money flows into the state than out of it. It is also by and large an underdeveloped colony. With that said, an Alaska under the AIP would be interesting. It could also energize a Nativist Movement. Also what happens to the military assets in the state? Does the lower 48 ask Canada for access to move north? |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
If an eventual secession happens in a democratic and peaceful way (which I think is the only plausible scenario) I don't think it would be necessary for the US to get back their military assets by force.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
And a low population? Alaska could become the Kuweit of the North if it ever became independent. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
The AIP is a joke. Hickel left the party shortly after he won. This is ASB without a change in ideology.
__________________
What if? |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't think this is difficult at all, with say a left-wing federal government forcing Alaska to sell it's oil at a way-below-market price to the lower-48 in the midst of an oil crisis. If Canada at the same time takes the opposite track - selling its oil at the high world price and reaping the rewards - the alternative would be very clear for Alaskans.
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
This would be sweet (but treasonous).
__________________
TR Wins in 1912 in: The Rise of Progressivism Teddy Roosevelt Jr. goes to war! (1938) Where've you gone, General Washington? Current year: 1815 |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The same would apply to many low-population Western states also. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|