|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
German... fascism?!?
I'm tempted to revive either of the various fascism definition discussion threads from the past couple of weeks, but I wanted to bring this to your attention:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_...ople%27s_Party Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stahlhe..._Frontsoldaten Quote:
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I must be misreading this.
![]() |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
It's quite simple, really. The Nazis were not, in the Italian or 'traditional' sense, Fascists. They were, in their own words, 'National Socialists'. Both systems are similar but have key differences, mainly economic.
The DNVP taking power has been discussed elsewhere, I think. I don't know much about it, but people have talked about the success of the Kapp Putsch (potentially ASB) leading to an Italofascist-style Germany. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
DNVP's problems are they are not Fascists. They don't appeal to the large masses for a nationalist revolution, but are more a Conservative Reactionary group that only appeal to the elite.
__________________
Still haven't changed my opinion |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Maybe some sort of Nationalist Coalition with other nationalist groups in Germany could rise up? (I know this could present its own set of... er... Nazi problems.)
__________________
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
You'd see something like Schusnigg's dictatorship in Austria on a much bigger scale.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Would there be friendlier relations with Dollfuss's Austria? Or is German expansionism in that area independent of Nazi control or not. If this differently fascist Germany is friends with Austrofacist Austria, it would be amusing to see them propping them up against the Austrian National Socialists, and hence Nazism ends up being an insurgent movement in both nations, subject to being stamped out by the fascist heel.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Germany will go for lost territories. You can't change that.
__________________
Still haven't changed my opinion |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Would they be a little less dominating towards the Austrians, though? Maybe allowing the VF as a regional party, while outlawing the rival Nazis (both in Austria and the rest of Germany).
Though I don't think the DNVP (or whichever non-Nazi right-wing movement that takes over) would necessarily be more moderate than the Nazis. They were largely anti-Semitic as well. I wonder how they would compare at all. But certainly they would lose some of the inherent weirdness associated with Hitler, Himmler, Goebbels, and the rest; hopefully that would include exterminationist tendencies. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm interested in a nationalist coalition, personally. Perhaps even one that includes both Nazis and ultra-conservative monarchists... If possible.
It would make the rise for power easier, but the ensuing clusterfuck of wrestling for control much more intense.
__________________
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Didn't think of that. So, yeah, there's a historical precedent for such an event. I think a Nazi struggle for prominence inside an ultra-conservative nationalist coalition government (particularly one including monarchists AND fascists) would make for a good read.
__________________
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Have Hugenberg not give control of his press to Goebbels. Takes away the much needed support of big business that the Nazi's would come to enjoy. The DNVP keeps big business, they could have taken power with the help of a military coup. They lacked the support for an elected government.
Also you could have a successful Kapp Putsch. But that might be ASB.
__________________
Dead By Dawn Chuck Heston vs Reagan vs Scoop |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
A very interesting idea. A Germany dominated by fascists instead of Nazis (in my opinion a form of fascism). This would mean a much less racialist Germany. Before the horrors of Naziism were revealed, fascism was not very stigmatized and much less feared than communism. A less racialist regime could avoid the bad press and buy itself more time for appeasement and rebuilding its military machine. Yes, Germany will certainly go for territory, but it will be either ethnic German or former German territory. It will not go for a massive campaign east to ethnically "purify" huge swathes of territory in Poland and Russia in and attempt to create a racial utopia. It will not be a regime led by goons and thugs, but by more educated, pragmatic, although obviously undemocratic men. The real question would be how "fascist" the regime would be, or whether it would be a run of the mill rightwing dictatorship. I am actually taking a history course on Naziism right now, and we have spend the first two weeks talking about the definition of fascism and whether the term actually has any meaning, so this was an aptly timed "what if".
Scipio
__________________
Things Fall Apart: A Valois-Burgundy Centered Timeline Full of Badassery |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Shades of the Horthy regime in Hungary?
__________________
|
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Anchluss probably wouldn't happen, though the Sudenland and Danzig corridors are possible. If that's all they limited their territorial ambitions to, the only people who would squawk over that are the Czechs and Poles and history shows the great powers would overlook that.
__________________
"Yall can go to hell, and I'll go to Texas." -Davy Crockett |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
The more I think about it the more similar it is to Franco's Spain, but who plays the role of Franco? Though the Nazis may play the role of Falange, in that they get purged. Wait but then who represents the SA and the people the Nazis purged in OTL then. I don't even know.
|
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
"Yall can go to hell, and I'll go to Texas." -Davy Crockett |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|