Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Discussion: After 1900

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 6th, 2011, 12:28 PM
Ismail Ismail is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 57
WI: Syria joins Iran in Iran-Iraq War?

During the war IRL Syria diplomatically sided with Iran, and when the Gulf War happened Syria sent troops to contribute against Iraq.

The only big issue I could see for Syria is that it would allow domestic troubles (e.g. discontented Sunni Arabs) to rise up and rebel.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old September 6th, 2011, 01:02 PM
Nassirisimo Nassirisimo is offline
Kamikaze Islamist
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Manchester, United Kingdom
Posts: 771
Well, Syria would have to be pretty sure about an Iranian victory if they were going to join, as they would earn the enmity of a lot of the Arab world and would want to make sure that the gains they would achieve from the war would outweigh that. This is difficult, since at first, many assumed that Iraq's relatively modernized army could roll over the Iranians who were still in disarray from the revolution.

There isn't a huge amount that the Syrians could bring to the war, as the Syrian army was just terrible. However, they would bring in a second front, which is always useful, if only to distract Iraqi troops away from the Iranians.
__________________
With The Crescent Above Us - Ever wondered about a world where the Ottomans won the war of 1877? Me neither!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old September 6th, 2011, 01:11 PM
Cook Cook is offline
Maybe I will
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Beyond the black stump
Posts: 1000 or more
The Syrians were tied down in Lebanon at the time, which is of far greater concern to Syrian leadership than the Western Desert of Iraq. Troops going into Iraq are troops that won’t be available for Lebanon so Syria is going to do worse there.

__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Georgepatton View Post
Operation Seacamel?!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emperor Julian View Post
Berlusconi for Pope: Why let the Church's collapse be slow?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyr View Post
a fairly realistic take on a zombie apocolypse
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old September 6th, 2011, 01:17 PM
Grumpy young Man Grumpy young Man is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 291
1) USA and SU if anything shared a common belief that Iran's revolution must be contained, although not by all means, since it was still considered a proxy war. Their non intervention policies would still be in place and all those supplying schemes they pulled off for both sides would probably be diverted to Iraq.

2) Israel's chief adversary in those days was Saddam and therefore they gave their support to Iran, although they both deny it today. Syrian entry in the war on the Iranian side would probably mean sharp decline of Israel's support.

3) Saudi Arabia would veto every step of Iran in the OPEC organization, she would do her best to keep the oil prices as low as possible so Iran would get as little profit as it could.

4) Even bigger upsurge of foreign fighters for Iraq from Sunni states.

5) I'm sure Turkey wouldn't just remain quiet but I can't guess what would she do in this case of a wider regional war except keeping sure that Worker's Party of Kurdistan does not get its hopes up.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old September 6th, 2011, 03:46 PM
aktarian aktarian is offline
illegal in 20 states
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: In your closet/in your head
Posts: 1000 or more
They'd be idiots to do it. LCW was flaring up, as did Israeli involvement in it. Opening another front would be suicidal for them.
__________________
Chaos, anarchy, destruction. My work here is complete.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old September 6th, 2011, 05:56 PM
Blackfox5 Blackfox5 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1000 or more
Iraq was being supported by practically every Sunni power in the Middle East against Iran. Syrian involvement in the war would escalate this into a major crisis. The Gulf monarchies don't have much manpower, but they could contribute something. Jordan and Egypt may also get involved if needed. This does not mean direct involvement as a belligerent, but there will be some sort of response. They are not going to let Iraq collapse so that Iranian Shiites can win.

The US will also not stand still. The US did not like either Iraq or Iran (or Syria), but was more anti-Iranian. They will work to compensate Iraq somehow so that Syria's involvement is countermanded.

A major Middle Eastern war of this will be extremely worrisome because of potential threats to the world oil supply and the politics of the Cold War. There will be a lot of diplomatic pressure to resolve it before more countries become involved.

If it does not, I expect the Gulf monarchies send huge amounts of money to Iraq so that it can fight with an effective blank check. All Sunni countries will be sending military intelligence reports to Iraq on Syrian troop movements, along with US and perhaps even Israeli intelligence clandestinely. There may not be organized ground troops sent to Iraq to help, but there would be close military cooperation. It's possible that clandestinely air force squadrons might be sent to enable Iraqi air supremacy over the Syrians.

No one really trusts Saddam Hussein, but no one wants an Iranian or Syrian victory. A prolonged war that saps everyone's strength is in everyone's best interests outside the actual participants.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old September 6th, 2011, 09:12 PM
Ismail Ismail is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 57
I suppose if Syria really looks like a threat then Turkey might intervene on behalf of NATO.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.