Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Discussion: Before 1900

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 26th, 2011, 01:43 AM
kasumigenx kasumigenx is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Occupied Selurong
Posts: 1000 or more
Send a message via Yahoo to kasumigenx
WI:A different Edward III

What if Isabelle, his mother has been loyal to his father, what would be the effects of it to Edward III, what would be the effects of a more happier childhood to Edward III.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kang Seung Jae View Post
No.

WIlson was a hyprocrat: the "self determination" was for the European people only, not the "uncivilized" people in the colonies.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old August 26th, 2011, 01:50 AM
Darth_Kiryan Darth_Kiryan is offline
The Númenorean Sith
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: AUS
Posts: 1000 or more
You would have to change the temperament of Edward II. Even before his ascension to the throne he had his favorites. You would have to make him a stronger, more authoritative king, that was what attracted Isabella to Roger Mortimer. He was everything that Edward was not..
__________________
"The choices of one shape the futures of all"

"Even the smallest decision can change the course of the future and enforce radical change"

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old August 26th, 2011, 01:57 AM
kasumigenx kasumigenx is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Occupied Selurong
Posts: 1000 or more
Send a message via Yahoo to kasumigenx
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adûnakhôr View Post
You would have to change the temperament of Edward II. Even before his ascension to the throne he had his favorites. You would have to make him a stronger, more authoritative king, that was what attracted Isabella to Roger Mortimer. He was everything that Edward was not..
I think a more tamer Isabella of France like her descendant, Isabella II of Spain, would also work, I think Longshanks and Edward III would benefit if Edward II was more straighter than OTL.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kang Seung Jae View Post
No.

WIlson was a hyprocrat: the "self determination" was for the European people only, not the "uncivilized" people in the colonies.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old August 26th, 2011, 04:10 AM
Elfwine Elfwine is online now
Byzantophilic Brony
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: West of Constantinople
Posts: 1000 or more
Edward personally, maybe, Edward as a king seems to be as successful as one could ask for until he got old.

Referring to Edward III.

The butterflies might have some interesting effects if one wants to run with them, but it would be changing details in the hopes they add up to something.

Edward I might feel more confidence in his son, which may or may not matter in his lifetime - its not as if Longshanks was unsuccessful.
__________________
Author of The Eagle of the Bosporus - a timeline inspired by Isaac's Empire
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.